Talk:Connectome (book)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"more footnotes" tag

A "more footnotes" tag was recently added to this article. When I wrote the article, I felt footnotes weren't necessary because the book summary's information came from the book, and indeed, the summary is divided into chapters, so readers can even see what chapter the information came from. The only thing missing is specific page numbers. I see it as pointless to add citations because they'd all be to the same book. What do others think? :)

As examples, here are some other books without footnotes for info taken from the book itself:

I see other articles where there are footnotes to the book, but typically these articles have interspersed info from other sources, making footnotes more necessary in those cases.

Brian Tomasik (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brian Tomasik: I agree. I came to the Talk page exactly to see if that had been discussed. -- Mati Roy (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]