Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of open-source mobile phones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging with List of open-source mobile phones

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No consensus to merge, although agreement to improve in other ways; details are not established, but discussion is stale. Klbrain (talk) 10:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the desire to merge as there is some duplication. A merge would also make it more obvious when a phone was added as a row in one table and not the other (e.g., Fairphone). However, the tables have different purposes. One gives basic information like the date of release and whether it is current, the other gives a detailed feature comparison. Joining the tables will increase the number of columns making what should be a simple table in the "List of Phones" article more difficult read. Please continue to cross-link in the See Also section instead of merging. Thanks. Ben (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I split it off because it would have been unwieldy and it seemed the best way to keep it legible. Expanding it and keeping it all up-to-date is a challenge; any suggestions for better formats welcome. HLHJ (talk) 03:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The List of open-source mobile phones article has an introduction ("This is a list of mobile phones with open-source operating systems."). Without that people, especially contributors will not know the criteria that says if a phone can be added in the table or not. Though maybe both articles should be renamed to something like that ("comparison of mobile phones with free software and open source operating systems") because there is also Open_source_hardware, so people might think it refers to that instead. GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov)) | talk 11:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Width

[edit]

The new MediaWiki has an "Appearance" DIV which allows the visitor to toggle between spuriously named "standard" artificially narrow width and nominally "wide" wrap-to-window which has remained the universal standard for thirty years. The table in this article is too wide to be viewed with the artificially narrow and spuriously named "standard" width (my laptop screen is 1366p wide) and in fact covers up the Appearance DIV, preventing the user from toggling width back to normal wrap-to-window. (View menu/Zoom can workaround this, but it is needlessly user-hostile.) Therefore can we specify this article should use full width? Or is that not something individual articles' content can control?

The PinePhone and the PinePhone Pro in the table contain many common values. However, they do not merge cells because their rows are not contiguous. I propose sorting the table rows alphabetically and merging the cells common to both PinePhones. This will reduce redundancy, aid comparison, and improve the ability to locate target information. If nobody has any objections I'll do that in the near future. 165.228.217.140 (talk) 07:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]