Jump to content

Talk:Communipaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Communipaw Avenue

[edit]
County Route 612 marker
County Route 612
Communipaw Avenue
Route information
Length1.94 mi[1] (3.12 km)
Major junctions
East endLiberty State Park (HBLR station)
Major intersections CR 501
West end NJ 440
Location
CountryUnited States
StateNew Jersey
CountyHudson
Highway system
CR 611 CR 613
  1. ^ "Hudson County 612 straight line diagram" (PDF). New Jersey Department of Transportation. Retrieved 2009-08-15.

Redundant maps

[edit]

Wikipedia does not include redundant state maps for municipalities let alone city neighborhoods; info included in inset which is sufficeint.Too large:photos should correspond with sub section.Djflem (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey is an oddball for its use of county maps for unincorporated communities in the state; a quick glance around the nation shows that the vast majority use only state maps. New Jersey's wikipedia editors are very insular in their tendencies and references, and a greater uniformity should exist across the country. Famartin (talk) 09:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the consensus for unincorporated communities in NJ is to use the county map. And what about neighbourhoods in urban areas? Djflem (talk) 22:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There should not be a "New Jersey" consensus on anything. There should be a national consensus, at minimum, since Wikipedia is a "global" organization. New Jersey is not special. In any case, the consensus would be to actually show a map of the city which depicts the district/neighborhood as a highlighted area. Note this only applies to cities, so would only apply to Communipaw (not Babbitt, which is a township). Famartin (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain the neighbourhoods in these templates? And direct me to the discussion about the consensus to which you are referring?

Djflem (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You misinterpret my meaning of "consensus". I have seen no discussion, but the most common map showing up in neighborhood maps is one showing the city with the neighborhood highlighted. Obviously, that requires work, and a lot of that work hasn't been done.Famartin (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Consensus as defined by Wikipedia. If you say the the "most common" is "showing the city with the neighborhood highlighted", why are you adding state maps?Djflem (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because: 1) These pages had *no* maps before I worked them, so either way I've improved the pages; 2) For consistency's sake, I've added both county and state maps to all the NJ unincorporated community pages I've gone through, since its obvious that some users prefer county, some prefer state, add both and everyone is happy (or, so I thought). Famartin (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Communipaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Communipaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garble

[edit]

In several places, too much information was crammed into one overlong, rambling sentence, making it hard to read. Some places also had syntax so distorted as to be uninterpretable, probably because of cut-and-paste errors and/or editors losing track of a sentence's structure by the time they got halfway through it. The regions of discontinuities and other breaks are underlined here.

--Thnidu (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]