Talk:Colonization of Pluto
This page
[edit]Contained an impressive amount of bollocks, which I removed, and is unencyclopedic because the subject matter is pure speculation and science fiction at the present time. Michaelbusch 22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Colonization of the trans-Neptunian objects
[edit]Well since is not considered a planet any more,but rather a dwarf planet, and definitions are style unclear, a merge in to a new article(trans neptunian..) makes more sense.Eris is bigger than Pluto and it will not bring much if we start an article about colonization for every dwarf planet of the solar system,especially if we consider that there's a buck of those that will be recognized soon.Plus their's very little/or no practical difference between these objects apart from the mass,if keeped separed they will be a lot of redundancy between the articles without adding anything meeningfull to the redear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.65.144.41 (talk • contribs)
This comment:
[edit]"Terraforming Pluto is completely out of the question, although crashing an asteroid from the belt near it could possibly cause water to freeze at the surface eliminating any need to drill." Drill for what? Ice? Rock? Frozen mammoths in permafrost? T.Neo (talk contribs review me ) 13:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Eyebrows raised high
[edit]I like the part about how hot it would get out there, in particular! And the lack of any reason for wanting a space elevator between Pluto and Charon, apart from that one might be able to do it. I rather get the feeling that this was written on a dare... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orbst (talk • contribs) 17:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)