Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Toolbox[edit]

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool
  • WP:LEAD - guidelines suggests 1-2 paragraphs for the lead. This has 3, I would move paragraph up to the first paragraph and combine them.
  • Done.
  • I would put one of the four pictures at the top of the article and scatter the other three through out instead of having a gallery at the bottom.
  • Personally, I think they do better in their own section, since they're not really about any specific aspect of Class A Wild Trout Waters, just general pictures showing what they can look like. I did learn several months ago that galleries aren't inherently forbidden,or even discouraged. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • One thing that would help is a picture by the lead, just something visual to pull people in. How about a trout picture?  MPJ-US  15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright violations Tool
  • It is only indicating some overlapping titles that really cannot be reworded such as "Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission"
Disambiguation links
  • No issues Green tickY
External links
  • No issues Green tickY

Well Written[edit]

  • "The first streams were designated as Class A Wild Trout Waters in 1983." should be reworded - how about something like "The first streams received their Class A Wild Trout Waters designations in 1983."
  • Done.
  • "At this time" should be "At the time"
  • Changed to "At that time".
  • "heavily-fished" should be "heavily fished"
  • Done.
  • "has, due to "'social' concerns", become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters." should be reordered "has become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters due to "'social' concerns""
  • Done.
  • "trout, since" does not need a comma
  • Done.
  • "for propagation" should be "for the propagation"
  • Done.
  • "stocked with trout, prior" does not need a comma
  • Done.
  • "and 62 Class A Wild Trout Waters" i feel like it is missing something?
  • Fixed.

Sources/verifiable[edit]

  • Reference 8 needs more info on the book
  • What more information is needed? There's already the agency that created it, the URL, the title, the date, and the page number. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking at the Google book link I cannot see any other data that can be added.  MPJ-US  02:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in coverage[edit]

  • It covers all aspects of the topic I believe. Green tickY

Neutral[edit]

  • yes Green tickY

Stable[edit]

  • No issues Green tickY

Illustrated / Images[edit]

  • All appropriatly licensed. Green tickY
  • @Jakec: - review complete. It is a fairly short article, but is just over the size of what i would expect as a minimum. Putting the review on hold for 7 days to allow for updates to be made.  MPJ-US  05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MPJ-DK: Thanks for picking up the review. I'm aware it is solidly on the short side, but I did feel it covered all the details one would expect to find. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jakec: - you are welcome, I agree it covers the main areas so while it's short it's not too short.  MPJ-US  15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jakec: - Looking at it now, I believe it's a GA - short and sweet I guess. Congratulations.  MPJ-US  02:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Class_A_Wild_Trout_Waters/GA1&oldid=713279369"