Talk:Charles Rust-Tierney

Untitled

Lots to fix. Have at it. OBDM 01:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it would violate any rules to mention the fact that numerous news sites completely failed to publish this story, it was about as much proof of a coverup and conspiracy as it gets. It seems only Right leaning news sources such as Fox and ABC even bothered to present the story, and CNN, NBC, and others seemed to have more important things to talk about, since it involved the left's best friend, the ACLU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.69.188 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

It involves the former president of a state chapter of the ACLU. That's not the most newsworthy thing in the world. And since when is ABC a right leaning news source? Harksaw 13:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Bill O'Reilly

Is the Bill O'Reilly portion of this article really necessary? While we're at it, why not post come of Hitler's commentary from Mein Kampf on the "Jews" article.

This guy is a FUCKING PEDOPHILE and you're worried about Bill O'Reilly's comments? Are you liberal? Nahh that couldn't be possible </sarcasm> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.115.77 (talk) 08:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I think the Bill O'Reilly section should be removed. If the section about media bias stays it needs to be clarified that the Washington Post is not a liberal newspaper, the entire executive staff are conservatives and it has been called a NeoCon publication more here: Washington Post's Political leanings -Mrbusta 20:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree that the O'Reilly portion is irrelevent. If somebody out there MUST cover this, then it needs to be expanded considerably. I have removed it. With respect to the user who is worried about this subject, I would argue that it is YOU who are worried about O'Reilly's comments. The article is about a pedophile for certain, not media bias.Tony Reed (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charles Rust-Tierney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120921225200/http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=CHARLES&Middle=&LastName=TIERNEY&Race=U&Sex=U&Age=&x=0&y=0 to http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=CHARLES&Middle=&LastName=TIERNEY&Race=U&Sex=U&Age=&x=0&y=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)