Talk:Chai Nam

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaiyanam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724005831/http://www.culture.pitlok.net/wat2.html to http://www.culture.pitlok.net/wat2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaiyanam change to Chai Nam[edit]

Requested move 24 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chaiyanam → Chai Nam – The article should reflect that as per subdistricts webpage http://www.chainam.go.th SietsL (talk) 09:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Matches the Royal Society's spelling guide. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Too bad I did not see this request before. The local government units often use totally non-standard romanized names. According to a book published by DOPA with the recommended transcriptions, this subdistrict should be named "Chaiyanam", the naming I always follow. Maybe @Potapt: can clear which romanization fits the actual pronounciation best. BTW: If "Chai Nam" is the better romanization, then the article text needs to be adjusted as well. andy (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. The Royal Society's directory (now here) has it as Chai Nam, though as Potapt pointed out in another discussion that document has been found to contain contradictions with their other publications. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it should be changed to Chai Nam, according to the document in the link provided by Paul_012, which in turn reflects the local pronunciation as heard here. --Potapt (talk) 21:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My latest was still the 2007 publication, didn't know there was a new updated version. And sadly again only a PDF, making it a more manual task to work through it to find the differences to update and document my XMLs [1]. andy (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]