Talk:Call of Duty/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

"cod hating" controversy

Shouldn't there be a section regarding the popular phenomenon of "hating Call of Duty" and accusations that it has "dumbed down" gaming? Virtually every forum and gaming website on the internet has CoD haters and CoD hating posts. I'm not taking sides or anything, but clearly this is a major phenomenon that has been going on for the past 5+ years and has had a major impact on the gaming industry. So should there be a criticism section?--24.171.6.27 (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Anything added in that respect needs to be in check with WP:V, that's the primary and arguably most central guideline that applies to all content on Wikipedia. As it applies here, it means that unless notable sources have covered this phenomenon, it shouldn't be mentioned in the article. Eik Corell (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

That's just other people's opinions. Definitely not worth adding. Cheetah255 (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

i think it should mention the CoD vs minecraft/tekkit war that outbreaks in the comments section of famous minecrafters (e.g. the yogscast) 86.173.121.122 (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Again, read WP:V. Comments on a blog or podcast are not reliable sources. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

New subsection

There should be a subsection in the game for the World at War series. World at War and Black Ops take place in the same universe. 75.174.96.93 (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

• Duly noted. You want something like Modern Warfare? --68.41.22.33 (talk) 04:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 12 April 2012

at:10/29/2003 text:"Call of Duty"
at:10/25/2005 text:"Call of Duty 2"
at:11/07/2006 text:"Call of Duty 3"
at:11/07/2007 text:"Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare"
at:11/11/2008 text:"Call of Duty: World at War"
at:11/10/2009 text:"Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2"
at:11/09/2010 text:"Call of Duty: Black Ops"
at:11/08/2011 text:"Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3"
at:11/01/2012 text:"Call of Duty: Black Ops 2"

24.150.108.209 (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Not done: It isn't clear what you want done. Also, you need reliable sources for any factual changes. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Call of Duty 9 to be revealed

Hey, can you update the information about the new Call of Duty 9? It was going to be revealed. Will you post it now or wait until the 1st of May, 2012?

Source is from the official page. Thanks ApekillerXD (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Information about the reveal is already included in the article Call of Duty 9. -- ferret (talk) 14:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Modify the introduction to the article - remove third person mention

Call Of Duty is stated to be a "first person and third-person shooter", but the latter is completely wrong because no game was released with such perspective, so the mention should be removed.

A third person spin-off (or chapter) was to be developed, but 6 months into production was put on hold/cancelled to let Sledgehammer Studios work alongside Infinity Ward to complete Modern Warfare 3. The demo they said they had, was never shown to the public, so it's just confusing to readers.

Here's a testimonial: Kotaku - whatever happened to cod third person game

– Bl4ckd0g (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

However, MW2 and I believe MW3 both feature 3rd person knife arena modes. -- ferret (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, there are multiplayer modes with third person, so it should stay. Dbrodbeck (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

critisms

Why is there no mention of the critisim that call of duty gets? fact: it is the most hated and milked franchise

We go by sources, reliable sources. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Once again, that is other peoples opinions, so it is not notable enough. Cheetah255 (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Merging Call of Duty Online with Call of Duty.

There should be something on the Call of Duty page to tell a little bit about COD Online. And of course a link to the full page. Death180 (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Merge and Redirect I think most if not all of it's content be put into the Call of Duty article and the Call of Duty Online become a redirect to Call of Duty. XapApp (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Protected

I've fully protected the article due to the recent content dispute edit war; please work it out here on the talk page. Dreadstar ☥ 22:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Editor TJD2 is pushing that an established consensus that World at War is part of the story and continuum of the Black Ops series, is incorrect. In view of his changes continuously requesting that a source prove this, I supplied [1], a known reliable source. TJD2's argument is one of semantics, that being "the same universe" (Distinct from the original trilogy and the Modern Warfare series) is not the same as being the same series. The game features characters that reappear in Black Ops and are an important part of it's story. I additional supply this RS's to back this further: [2] (References Reznov being the same as from World at War), an interview with Treyarch that directly states it the same Reznov in both games [3]. Black Ops continues characters and plots that began in World at War, making it logical to group the games together. Wikipedia isn't really required to have sources for explaining the exact method used to organize articles into logical groups. The three games are a related universe, and so should be kept together. On principal, I also feel the original version should be retained until the content dispute is concluded. The current protection freezes in place the BOLD move that is being contested. -- ferret (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Does the site say SPECIFICALLY this game is IN the Black Ops series? No it does not. That's like saying since Final Fantasy X and Final Fantasy X-2 are set in the same world as Final Fantasy VII, that makes them a part of the "FFVII series". It is not an argument of semantics, it is a logical argument. A source that specifically states COD WaW is the first game in the Black Ops series is needed to justify this organization. Ferret, you say "BOLD" as if you are the one who is right. This is very subjective as you have no proof, sources, or evidence to support your claim. They chose to freeze my version because it is the most objective. WaW takes place in World War II; this can be sourced reliably. The fact that WaW was a part of Black Ops JUST because they share a character however is very SUBjective. Thank you Dreadstar for the protection by the way. TJD2 (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I think the fact that you believe Dreadstar has endorsed your position simply because he did not choose to revert it prior to protect is a poor way of continuing this discussion. You're taking that as justification that you're right, and throughout this you've been pretty rude in your edit history notes such as "Don't change this without talking to me." This is borderline display of ownership for the article. If it would make you feel better, we can change the word "series" to "universe", because again, you are arguing semantics. The three games are related and as such should be grouped together. Instead of looking for a compromise like changing the word "Series" you very aggressively pursue your own view and go to admins with false accusations that you've been told "Sources aren't needed" (When you HAD been given a source, even if you disagreed with it). -- ferret (talk) 16:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I never said I own the article, you are putting words in MY mouth. "Wikipedia isn't really required to have sources for explaining the exact method used to organize articles into logical groups." You did say sources aren't needed, this is not false. Compromise would not be to change series to universe, as with that it would still be organized as you saw fit. You are very aggressive even on this talk page with me; you act like I am being unreasonable and will only accept changes that are in no way correct. "Don't do this without talking to me" I NEVER said this. I never said the article was mine, I don't even edit COD that often. All I know is I had three angry friends over here point out the stupidity of the issue, and as I'm the one with the WP account I changed it to more objective organization. Read my last response pertaining to Final Fantasy VII. I don't know if you are familiar with the games, but the character ShinRah appears in FFX-2 and later creates the corporation ShinRah in FFVII on a different planet. This does not put them in the same series, it merely shows they set in the same universe. We still don't group by which game is in what universe though. One user commented and suggested grouping the games by developer. Ferret what do you think about that idea?TJD2 (talk) 20:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

• Several things, my protection in no way endorsed either side of this dispute per WP:WRONGVERSION. Two, stop making comments about each other and focus solely on the editorial content of the article. And three, looking at the lack of progress here, I'd recommend following the next steps in the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution process; top pick for this one looks to be WP:3O. Dreadstar ☥ 20:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I agree. That's why I wanted to bring to attention the option of grouping the games by developer. A user had posted that on the template talk page and I thought it might be worthy of discussion here as well. TJD2 (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

• Third party opinion - Hi there, from reading the various points put forward by editors here and on the template talk page, sources given I have come to the conclusion that WaW should be included in the Black Ops series as certain story arcs appear to begin there that are picked up in BO and BO2. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 12:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

We are exploring other options due to the amount of disagreement on the talk page. A third option would be to group by developer, but does anybody else have any ideas on how we could organize the CoD page/template and all reach a consensus?TJD2 (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I have a proposition. I've edited the template to show how it might look should we choose to group the games by developers. I am trying to come up with a third option as Dreadstar stated (sorry Dreadstar I accidentally called you Dreadwaters on the template revision history for some reason my bad :D). What does everyone think?TJD2 (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry if I wasn't clear enough, but I didn't mean a third option, instead I was referring to a Third Opinion by a neutral uninvolved party; that request was answered by User:Cabe6403 above. Dreadstar ☥ 21:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I was under the impression that option provided by editor TMV943, who stated on the template talk that we should group the games by developer, was the third opinion. user:Codename Lisa thought this was a good idea as well, and would be a good compromise for the dispute.TJD2 (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I was really only looking at the dispute on this article; if there's consensus found for options here from the template talk page, then that's great! I was just clarifying what I was saying above. I've added Template talk:Call of Duty series to my watchlist as well. Dreadstar ☥ 22:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Actually, I thought TMV943's suggestion is worth consideration; so, I considered and eventually rejected it. A later message of me in the template talk page reveals that. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 11:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to point out that a "third option" isn't required or strictly called for. If third party opinions' express a preference for either the original state with WAW under Black Ops, or the newer state of WAW under World War II, then that can form a consensus as well. If third opinions express a preference for the "third option", that works as well. However, Cabe's opinion cannot be simply negated because there are other options on the table. There are statements from at least five editors preferring that WAW be grouped with Black Ops. There is one editor preferring it be grouped under World War II, who also leans to a third option. There is one editor preferring the third option of grouping games by developer, which does not wholly address as it does not preserve the logical grouping that WAW is part of the Black Ops continuum. I won't speak for Codename Lisa as they have been fairly neutral, initially expressing that it be grouped with Black Ops but also suggesting the third option should be considered.

I don't believe the template should be changing while discussion is on-going. Grouping by developer isn't addressing the real issue and ultimately is a slightly adjusted version of TJD2's position. Even if grouped by Developer, there is still a question of whether the games under Treyarch should be organized with WAW under World War II or Black Ops. The developer organization may provide more information but does not solve the "series" issue.

I'd like to understand why TJD2 is opposed to organizing the template to show the story connection among the the three games, which are clearly of the same continuum and multiple sources are provided showing this. If the objection is to the game being labelled as a direct part of the series, then as I've suggested we can change the wording to indicate it is a particular universe/continuum. Ultimately, my position is that it is most useful for the reader to understand that the three games are related by having them listed together. -- ferret (talk) 00:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I've been thinking about it and you're right Ferret; a good compromise would be to change "series" to "arc", "continuum", or "universe", as they share similar characters and story arcs. Let's just do that and put WAW behind Black Ops if thatd be cool with you?TJD2 (talk) 04:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

That's fine with me. I don't care that it's listed as part of the "series". Only that it's clearly connected to the "Black ops continuum" which is very useful to readers to understand the games are connected and are the same timeline. Another option is to just remove the word "series" entirely with no replacement. I'm not particularly attached to arc, continuum or universe, so whichever you like is fine with me. -- ferret (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I changed it to "story arc". Glad we could come to a compromise.TJD2 (talk) 04:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't really mind about MW and BO, but I don't think that the WWII games (1, 2, 3) constitute a "story arc." For all intents and purposes they're separate games that have no bearing on each other; they just happen to be about the same war. bibliomaniac15 02:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Latest release

Hopefully someone is going to update the latest release of the game when it launches in 2 days. Gotta stay on top people. Majinsnake (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)majinsnake

United Offensive is a unofficial addon

Don't buy "United Offensive" it's a uofficial mod/hack as well the "Operation Abver", "Operation Market Garden" and "The Secrets of Reich" e.t.c. and it shows on mods menu o_0, and what an such idiot counts this mod as official expasion pack and it's part of Call of Duty series? please remove this and the expsansion packs section. Call of Duty don't have official expansion packs at all! 109.174.115.63 (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Return to Castle Wolfenstein also don't have official expansion packs at all, although it had many user-made unofficial addons/mods which include: Operation Trondheim — H.M. Special Forces, Operation Trondheim 2: Red Alert, Operation Trondheim 3: Iron Cross, Stalingrad, Time Gate, Project 51, Resident Evil (Призраки Войны), Диверсант (В тылу врага), Проклятие фараонов and Ставка больше, чем жизнь. 109.174.115.63 (talk) 12:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Call of Duty 2 also had unofficial addon Holy War. 109.174.115.63 (talk) 12:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

"United Offensive" is an official expansion published by Activision. -- ferret (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

No "United Offensive" is an unofficial expansion but published by Activision. 109.174.115.63 (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

You're talking nonsense. Activision has worked with several developers to produce franchise games. To the best of my knowledge this was what they did here, and the developer - Grey Matter Studios, were later merged with Treyarch. Point is it's not "unofficial". Eik Corell (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

But actually it looks like in that way: it shows on mods menu and there's no flame death animations instead the character will repeatedly pain and die in normal way and not being burned like they do in World at War games. 109.174.115.255 (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

That's simply the way it was done back then, in that engine. UO is an official expansion. -- ferret (talk) 04:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

No! The official COD games are Call of Duty 1, Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty 3, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty: World at War, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Call of Duty: Black Ops, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 and spinoffs Call of Duty: Finest Hour, Call of Duty 2: The Big Red One and Call of Duty 3: The Roads to Victory. all other games like "Operation Market Garden", "United Offensive", "Operation Abver", "The Secrets of Reich", "Holy War", "The Feat of Soldier" etc. are unofficial, buggy, showed in mods menu and received negative reviews just like many unofficial addons. 109.174.115.255 (talk) 16:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but you're simply wrong. United Offensive is an official expansion pack for Call of Duty 1. Whether or not it is buggy is irrelevant. Whether it got negative reviews is irrelevant. (It didn't, it has an 87 on Metacritic with an 8.5 from users) -- ferret (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

No! United Offensive is an unofficial expansion pack for Call of Duty 1, It's buggy (i remember bug when you get in jeep on Bastogne 1 level, the error message pop ups that says CoDSP.exe has stopped working), shows on mods menu and does not show on Windows Vista/7 Game Explorer (Windows Vista/7 don't like unofficial mods uh) and there's no flame death animations, instead the character will repeatedly pain and die in normal way and not being burned like they do in World at War games. Call of Duty don't have official expansion packs at all! Plus the mp vehicles are only on Call of Duty 3 and Call of Duty: World at War (although the modders are used to add mp vehicles in Call of Duty 1 and Call of Duty 2), the sprint was first implemented only on Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (although the modders are used to add sprint in Call of Duty 1 and Call of Duty 2), the flamethrowers are only on Call of Duty: World at War and Call of Duty: Black Ops (although the modders are used to add flametrowers in Call of Duty 1 and Call of Duty 2). What the heck they count it as official and the part of Call of Duty series even through it's acts like that? 109.174.115.63 (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Either find a reliable source to back up your claim that Activision's Call of Duty, United Offensive' is 'unofficial' or, frankly, go away. Your original research is meaningless here, as is anyone else's Dbrodbeck (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your argument flawed - What you're doing is throwing red herrings at us. Arguing about death animations or bugs in the game does not support your argument that it's unofficial. Eik Corell (talk) 13:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 November 2012

Hello, can you please me to change "Call of Duty is a first-person shooter video game developed by Ideaworks Game Studio, and published by Activision for the iPhone OS. It is a spin-off of the Call of Duty series, and based on the "Nazi Zombies" mode of Call of Duty: World at War. A sequel for the iPhone and iPod Touch includes Shi No Uma that was originally released on the Xbox 360, PS3, and PC." to "Call of Duty is a first-person shooter video game developed by Ideaworks Game Studio, and published by Activision for the iPhone OS. It is a spin-off of the Call of Duty series, and based on the "Nazi Zombies" mode of Call of Duty: World at War. A sequel for the iPhone and iPod Touch includes all of the maps that were originally released on the Xbox 360, PS3, and PC, and that is including Der Riese. RainyPoseidon (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. Can you provide a source? gwickwire | Leave a message 19:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit Request on 25 November 2012

Can you please change the Call of duty Black ops 2 Section so at the end it says The game has since been released on November 13 2012 here is my source:http://ca.ign.com/games/call-of-duty-black-ops-ii/xbox-360-126311

if you scroll down it will say release date november 13 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 01infamous10 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Already done. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Call of Duty: World at War is sorted as one of the Black Ops series on the wiki page. This can't be true or?

Must be an error on the wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.132.253.117 (talk) 21:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

World at War is part of the same universe as Black Ops and contains several characters that appear in BO. It's sorted as such to show this connection to the BO story line. -- ferret (talk) 21:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I know some of the characters carry over, but it's a bit weird to list WaW as part of the "Black Ops series" when WaW came out before BO. Generally a series is named after the first game. I couldn't find WaW in the template, expecting it to be listed in WW2 games, and was very confused. Some guy (talk) 01:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

That's why the word "series" isn't in use. See the section above titled Protected -- ferret (talk) 13:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment at List of Call of Duty characters article

Hello, I have started an RfC here to discuss whether the List of Call of Duty characters should have the KIA/MIA markers or they should be removed. Please give your thoughts. Thanks! Some guy (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I have been so sorry for deleting the info off the page, I only do that rarely, when I get so mad. I'll promise my next edit will be a spot of canon info. P.S. In the UK CodBO2 advert, the song "Back in Black" by AC/DC played. Cokerox (talk) 18:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Link between Call of Duty and violent mass murders

I strongly feel that there should be some mention of the negative impact that Call of Duty has received in the media as it has been cited as a game played extensively by at least two mass murderers and is regularly cited as being the most violent game ever invented.

They are:

Adam Lanza Dec 14, 2012, killed twenty children and six adults

"The Connecticut school massacre gunman Adam Lanza spent hours playing violent video games such as Call Of Duty in a windowless bunker".

Anders Behring Breivik July 22, 2011, killed 69 people, mostly teenagers

"Anders Breivik 'trained' for shooting attacks by playing Call of Duty"

Aminto (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

They also both drank milk I imagine.... Is playing COD that important to these two guys' behaviour? If so, mention it on their pages, not on the franchise page. Dbrodbeck (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Dbrodbeck (talk) 09:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC) I feel it's odd that previously the page didn't mention the word violent or violence even once! I've therefore edited it to talk more about the violence while still mentioning the most extreme cases as examples. I'm citing 7 different sources and there's plenty more out there, so I feel this is obviously a common concern of parents. If you disagree, perhaps you can suggest a new way of putting this on the talk page. (I know you're a big fan of Call of Duty, as you've previously defended it here too). Here's what I've said currently:

Connection between Call of Duty and Violence

Call of Duty has regularly been cited as an extremely violent video game, for example PC Magazine voted Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 as the most violent video game ever in 2012 .

It has also been repeatedly cited in the press in association with violent incidences, the most alarming of which are two mass murders and a suicide. These are:

Adam Lanza Dec 14, 2012, killed twenty children and six adults

"The Connecticut school massacre gunman Adam Lanza spent hours playing violent video games such as Call Of Duty in a windowless bunker".

Anders Behring Breivik July 22, 2011, killed 69 people, mostly teenagers

"Anders Breivik 'trained' for shooting attacks by playing Call of Duty"

Callon Green hanged himself and a coroner warned parents against allowing their children to play too many games like Call of Duty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminto (talk • contribs) 09:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

We need consensus to add stuff. Please look at WP:BRD. Keep in mind that this is the holiday season in much of the world, and, people may not be fiercely editing wikipedia for the next few days. By the way, the fact that I play video games has absolutely NOTHING to do with my editing, I assure you. Please see the archive, this has been discussed. [4] Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Although there may be links I don't believe it adds any value to the article. It's no more useful than adding to an article about a food stuff that a murderer used to eat it in between killing his victims.CJKillerSam (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

Merge Proposal and Redirect–Move. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the target talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request for the Proposal to Merge Call of Duty Online into this talk page's article was:

Consensus Reached–Awaiting Merge.

Proposed Merge from Call of Duty Online to Call of Duty; November 2012

There should be something on the Call of Duty page to tell a little bit about COD Online. And of course a link to the full page. Death180 (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect I think most if not all of it's content be put into the Call of Duty article and the Call of Duty Online become a redirect to Call of Duty. XapApp (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I encourage tha making of a new article over adding something to an existing one. However, Call of Duty does require a section about the online envirorment and the online article is too small, so I would recommend to merge in this case.
Also, the section Call of Duty in popular culture (or similar) should be added. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 00:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect With the external link references of COD Online brought in-line. -- ferret (talk) 20:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
• Support Merge. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 22:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect Solar Police™ Talk 10:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.

Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 17:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

A copy of this template can be found here.

Wikia

I noticed that Company of Heroes 2 has an external link to the Company of Heroes Wikia, could someone please add the Call of Duty Wikia to this page? 92.17.227.119 (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 9 February 2013

Could it please be added at the bottom of the page an external link to the Call of Duty Wiki, I noticed that the Company of Heroes 2 page has an external link to their Wiki and I would like ours placed on this page. Thank you. 92.17.227.119 (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

wikis are fan sites, we don't link to those, and it is not there at Company of Heroes anyway. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Ah, it seems the wiki was removed form the CoH2 page sometime after I saw it. Thanks for letting me know anyway. 92.17.227.119 (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I deleted it actually.... Dbrodbeck (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Modern Warfare 4 info

Why hasn't any info or details been added to wikipedia. Since January, the game publishers have already gave info and screen shots and a youtube video. --108.32.10.194 (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Add Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 already.

We all know what will come after the next MW, we might as well add Black Ops III to the list aswell XD. Someone should really start adding the MW4 template already! IW says it will officially announce their "next" game. They already said to be sticking to the current IW Engine too. So lets get things moving here Wiki! --Expertseeker90 (talk) 11:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Do you have any reference? Dbrodbeck (talk) 11:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 22 March 2013

at:11/15/2013 text:"Call of Duty: Ghost"

198.254.16.200 (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

 Not done please be more specific. -- Ninja Dianna (Talk) 02:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

It's Call of Duty: Ghosts

Forget about what i said about MW! It will be named Call of Duty: Ghosts instead. It probably may be something different; likely a continuation of MW, but in a new story arc. But its probably wise to not add any new article, or page until May when Infinity Ward and Activision offically annnounce the game. --Expertseeker90 (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Soon as we have a reliable source or two we can add some information on it. -- ferret (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

next call of duty game

the next call of duty game was confirmed as "Call Of Duty : Ghosts". Activision officially mention this title on May 1 2013. Vedhaganapathy (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. I highly doubt they mentioned it on a date that is a month from now. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 10 April 2013

Just to change the title of the article from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty_(Series) since the article is talking about the series as a whole like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_(series) for instance. Would help with confusion.

So change:

| title = Call of Duty

To

| title = Call of Duty Series

(I'm pretty sure this is the only part you need to change to change the URL and in page title)

Beastmonkey (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Not done: Per WP:NCVG recommendations, this is the recommended name. The article already has a hatnote at the top to help with potential confusion.  — daranz [ t ] 07:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quick Question...

Is this page outdated a bit, because Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 doesn't seem to redirect to here. --108.211.193.185 (talk) 03:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 8 May 2013

Your should probable go ahead and add the release date for Call of Duty: Ghost. (November 5, 2013) A lot of people are going to want to hear about it. Sajesenior (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Already done. This information was added to the article a week ago [5], along with a link to the article on Call of Duty: Ghosts. --ElHef (Meep?) 03:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

The part where it says upcoming, it should be mentioned when the series will be speculated to end and what the specifics were of Sledgehammers game and how it may be canceled. (Theres a lot more to it). And the COD MMO WAS released for a China release only called Call of Duty: Online, COD: Online is not in here either. Look it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.174.174 (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

All of that appears to already be in the article. -- ferret (talk) 18:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Johs12345 (talk) 05:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC) Why the hell is this protected that doses not make sense. Oh buy the way why would this so impotent to protected it's a goddamn video game!

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Alternatively, you may become an autconfirmed user, and be able ti edit through the semi-protection. The article has been semi-protected due to persistent vandalism. NiciVampireHeart 06:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Fix the incorrect tertiary statements of at least the 3 COD iterations: Modern Warfare 2, Modern Warfare 3, Black Ops. Fitzm (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2014

Swap the following url: http://www.gamaustra.com/view/feature/130125/call_of_duty_the_lawsuit.php

With this url: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130125/call_of_duty_the_lawsuit.php

Because: www.gamasutra.com actually leads to an article. gamaUStra (capitalisation for emphasis) leads to spam.

62.249.185.5 (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done -- ferret (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit Request 1/14/15

Why is Call of Duty: World at War bunched in with the Black Ops story arc? It should be in the WWII story arc, as it has absolutely nothing to do with Black Ops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.117.13 (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Viktor Reznov is in both games, therefore they share continuity. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 03:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Additionally, there are reliable sources where Treyarch referred to Black Ops as a sequel to World at War. -- ferret (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2016

Change: "As of April 2015, the Call of Duty series has sold over 175 million copies." to "As of January 2016, the "Call of Duty" series has sold over 250 million copies." Sobatrox (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eteethan(talk) 19:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Call of Duty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121109203912/http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130125/call_of_duty_the_lawsuit.php to http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130125/call_of_duty_the_lawsuit.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Checked. -- ferret (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Sortable tables in video game series

@The1337gamer, Osh33m, Hippo99, IDV, and Dissident93, @Ozdarka, Sergecross73, Lucia Black, and Czar: For reference, see recent discussions at Talk:Souls (series)#Game table, Talk:Banjo-Kazooie (series)#Prose that was converted to table and Talk:Valkyria#The table, the character/setting sections, and the current state of this article.. Relevant participants of those discussions, both for and against, pinged.

I don't think this table provides a meaningful set of information to the readers. It's a large chunky table that lists the release years and games, which was already represented in a concise timeline. It additionally lists their systems and developers. In the case of systems, this is currently organized differently than I've seen at any other article, so it's not quite consistent (Typically each system has a dedicated column). WP:MOSTABLE seems partially opposed to a table like this, and they have been mentioned negatively in a couple of GANs and FACs.

Perhaps, since this discussion has occurred several times of late, it's best to just head to WT:VG, but I'm starting here at this article. -- ferret (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia has always been a place to find relevant information about a topic in a concise and exhaustive format.

Sortable tables are the best way to give a good overview on a given topic of serial character.

Those small timelines often miss important information that are difficult to compare otherwise.

In the present case, Call of Duty is a long series spanning over several systems and by alternating developers.

I think this table contains the most important info people are looking up.

ferret, in your example of Souls (series), it contains only FOUR titles, why a sortable table might not be relevant in that case.

When citing MOS:Tables, you should not spare out the first part (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Tables#Appropriate_use where Tables are actually encouraged. -- in this context see Multi-column mixed sortable unsortable - Filmographies, which shows the parallels to video game series.

The format - e.g., console generations - can be modified (e.g., by brands Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft etc.).

However, the discussions show that opinions diverge on this issue - there is neither a clear pro nor contra.

Of course, both a clear overview AND prose are often required to give the reader the best insight. Hippo99 (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• A navbox could handle the basic task of listing them in chronological order (one already exists). The rest of the info belongs in prose in the article (this info exists as well), so my personal opinion is that these sort of tables should be removed. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Feel free to join: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Video_game_series:_Template:Video_game_timeline_vs_Template:Wikitable_sortable_vs_Template:Video_game_titles Best regards, Hippo99 (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Call of Duty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091001145956/http://au.gamespot.com:80/features/6081710/index.html?tag=gameguide;title;1 to http://au.gamespot.com/features/6081710/index.html?tag=gameguide;title;1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110720222146/http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/callofduty3/news.html?sid=6149040 to http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/callofduty3/news.html?sid=6149040
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110920160521/http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6197777.html?tag=other-user-related-content;1 to http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6197777.html?tag=other-user-related-content;1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629004338/http://www.gamespot.com/news/6209543.html?tag=recent_news;img;1 to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6209543.html?tag=recent_news;img;1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110708192540/http://www.computerandvideogames.com/288796/news/call-of-duty-8-dev-targets-bug-free-game/ to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/288796/news/call-of-duty-8-dev-targets-bug-free-game/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110614002518/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6252764/2011-call-of-duty-not-sledgehammer-action-adventure to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6252764/2011-call-of-duty-not-sledgehammer-action-adventure
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110616212637/http://www.gamezone.com/news/item/call_of_duty_action_figures_announced to http://www.gamezone.com/news/item/call_of_duty_action_figures_announced
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070704185016/http://www.kotaku.com:80/gaming/oddities/call-of-duty-nazi-action-figure-discontinued-25245.php? to http://kotaku.com/gaming/oddities/call-of-duty-nazi-action-figure-discontinued-25245.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081224234121/http://www.spawn.com:80/toys/series.aspx?series=427 to http://www.spawn.com/toys/series.aspx?series=427
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120102064249/http://www.callofduty.com:80/xp/travel to http://www.callofduty.com/xp/travel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Blood Lines

This referenced material may be merged into this article. ~Kvng (talk) 18:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Warfare games

On the article, only the 'Modern Warfare' titles are grouped together, even though each of the games have a similar style and the obvious similarities with the titles. Given the fact that the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Remastered Edition is coming out with the new title (Infinite Warfare), isn't it about time that each of the Warfare games be grouped together? The argument is made that only COD4 through Modern Warfare 3 have the same characters. With that being the case, the Warfare games should be the section, while the Modern Warfare story arc, should be a divided sub-section within that sub-series of games. The titles are similar for a reason.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Burningblue52 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 2 May 2016‎ (UTC)

We need something that groups these games together beyond just the inclusion of the word "Warfare" in the subtitle. Are they the same universe? Has Activision ever commented on it? Without that, they're separate entities and grouping them together is clunky. As for similar style, that really applies to every game... that's why they're all Call of Duty. Prove they are part of the same sub-series with a source. That's why World at War is grouped with Black Ops, because there are sources showing that Black Ops was repeatedly referred to as a sequel (As well as the shared characters and flash backs). -- ferret (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

• Many times within a certain series, or within this sub-series for example -- there is what is called anthology installments. Examples of this would be within the Cloverfield films, the True Detective and American Horror Story TV series. I will find out if there are sources saying so. Burningblue52 (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Call of Duty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/cod/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Ds

Call of duty world at war was put on the Nintendo DS. Call of Duty MW3 was also on the DS and lastly call of duty 4 advanced warfare was on the DS Yodudeman76 (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

They are not in the chart Yodudeman76 (talk) 03:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done -- ferret (talk) 13:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit request on 4 August 2016

This article should also add the new mobile game Call of Duty: Heroes, also needs to be explain when it was released and gameplay mechanics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristo 680 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2016

Please change creator = Ben Chichoski to creator = Infinity Ward because Ben Chichoski is not the creator of Call of Duty. As someone who was a founder of Call of Duty and Infinity Ward, I can assure you this guy is not the 'creator'. I'd never heard of his name until today and he never worked for us. I can be contact [email protected] or @ChanceGlasco on twitter for more info.

Krunko (talk) 22:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Partly done: Cleared the creator. Ben is apparently credited with creating the CoD card game. Creator field should contain people, so I did not replace it with Infinity Ward. -- ferret (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2016

latest release section should be Infinity wareware or Mordern warefare remastered ThePashupatee (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

No, it shouldn't. Latest release means the last game to be released. Infinite Warfare hasn't been released yet, so it cannot be the latest release. --The1337gamer (talk) 06:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Modern Warfare Remastered?

This should go on the chart, right? If not please explain to me, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooldommania (talk • contribs) 18:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I believe it should. Mbrennan8 (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit request on 15 December 2013

This article should probably mention that the first Call Of Duty started due to the success of Medal of Honor and sought to add realism and more realistic sounds especially for the weapons. Both medal of Honor and Call of Duty were made possible due to ID Games licensing the Quake III Arena engine. ID Games who created the success of the First person Shooter through Wolfenstein 3D and the original Doom therefore enabled two of the most successful FPS games of all time, the free Enemy Territory and the Call of Duty franchise to happen among others.

Why would this be necessary on an article meant for the Call of Duty franchise only? Mbrennan8 (talk) 03:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2017

For the "Call of Duty: World at War" section, can you add a reference to the fact that it is the first game in the COD franchise to include the Zombies gamemode? Conjo434 (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 10:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2017

i would like to add one game because its missing one call of duty game Mitch0305 (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- ferret (talk) 11:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2017

move the entire Call of Duty: World at War section from Black Ops story arc to Other story arcs. The only relation World at War has with Blackops is the developer, there is no story relation.

Other story arcs Call of Duty: World at War Main article: Call of Duty: World at War Call of Duty: World at War, developed by Treyarch, is the fifth installment of the main series. It returns to the World War II setting of earlier titles.[19] It is set in the Pacific theater and Eastern front of World War II. The game uses the same proprietary game engine as Call of Duty 4 and was released for the PC, PS3, Wii, Xbox 360 consoles and the Nintendo DS handheld in North America on November 11, 2008, and November 14, 2008 in Europe. As of June 2009, Call of Duty: World at War has sold over 11 million copies.[20]

68.100.19.25 (talk) 00:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done: This has been discussed before, and multiple sources exist claiming that they exist within the same universe and in-universe time continuum. This includes direct statements from the developer that they are related. -- ferret (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

and where are the sources corroborating that? the 2 cited in the paragraph don't mention it at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.19.25 (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Read through archive 2, it was discussed years ago. In particular, Treyarch repeatedly stated that Reznov from both games are the same person. -- ferret (talk) 01:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

that sounds like relevant info that should be in that paragraph no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.19.25 (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Race to Prestige

As this year's Race to Prestige is ongoing, shouldn't there be a mention of this Twitch event in the Call of Duty Endowment section? Ref 59 already mentions the 2014 stream. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request from 6 November 2017

It should be changed from the article saying Call Of Duty: WW2 is the most recently announced game to Call Of Duty: WW2 is the most recently released game. JamieTheRaccoon (talk) 23:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

World at War

Why is "Call of Duty: World at War" under "Black Ops" story arc ? Can someone show me reliable source ? I cannot find any news article that says "World at War" is related to "Black Ops" story arc. StormHero (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

I've visited the "Activision Official Q&A Support" and asked them about this question and they replied "Call of Duty: World at War" and "Call of Duty: Black Ops" were developed by the same developers and etc. but they did not tell me how the story lines are related. StormHero (talk) 12:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Call_of_Duty/Archive_2#Protected is the longer discussion that last addressed this. World at War is the same universe as Black Ops per Treyarch, and featuring Reznor as a character. See this review and this review which both cover these shared elements and that they are the same universe/arc. -- ferret (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2018

KeybladeKingdom (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. General Ization ^Talk 19:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare: Mobilized listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare: Mobilized. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

COD logic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect COD logic. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty Trickshots listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty Trickshots. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Callofduty listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Callofduty. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty (Deluxe Edition) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty (Deluxe Edition). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty (Game of the Year Edition) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty (Game of the Year Edition). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Missions of Call of Duty listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Missions of Call of Duty. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

List of characters in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 2. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

List of characters in Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty Video Game Series listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty Video Game Series. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Mission Zero listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty: Mission Zero. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Call of Duty (film series) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty (film series). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Edit semi-protected

I want edit page, because in game series don`t writed about mobile (J2ME) games. Give me possibility for edit or just edit themselves.

Call of Duty 3, Call of Duty 4 : Modern Warfare, Call of Duty : World at War, Call of Duty : Black Ops were published on mobile phones (J2ME).

Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 2 : Force Recon - separate game, which was published only for mobile phones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russiaoniichan (talk • contribs) 16:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please also make the request at the particular article the change needs made at. This page is only for editing the series article. -- ferret (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 April 2020

Add category - [[Category:Video games containing battle passes]] BritishGuy (talk) 14:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

The phrase "battle pass" does not appear in the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: This is the article about the franchise as a whole. While some individual games within the franchise may have battle passes, the usage varies and makes this article ineligible for inclusion in the category. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 April 2020

If I can't edit the page, I would like to request the addition of a Metacritic score of 7.1 for MW2 Campaign Remastered for the PS4. Certainlyfour (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done I've entered the review score into Wikidata. -- ferret (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Top grossing

Call of Duty is one of the highest-grossing video games of all time, having grossed $18.1 billion in lifetime revenue as of 2019. - I think this statement should be added in the first paragraph (I can't add it, the page is protected). Avram25 (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Fallout with Infinity Ward leadership

can someone clean this up. It's really hard to read. 173.81.146.139 (talk) 08:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 August 2020

Add 9th Gen column for Titles in the Call of Duty series table under Main Series 92.237.9.174 (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: There is currently no sourcing or recognition of a ninth generation of consoles at this time. This is an on going topic of discussion around several articles and WP:VG. -- ferret (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 August 2020

On Aggregate review scores under Main series is there no reluctance in adding a new row for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, even though the Metacritic scores are not released? This happened previously with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Campaign Remastered. Also on the introductory table please put Raven Software under Primary Developer(s) for 2020-present. 92.237.9.174 (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: There's no reception for Cold War yet. Considering the issues surrounding the game, Sledgehammer's removal from development, and Treyarch being brought in to take primary lead, I'm not sure we should add Raven to Primary Developers yet. -- ferret (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 August 2020

On the section "Fallout with Infinity Ward leadership", there is a red link to "Electronic Acts". Does the article mean Electronic Arts? 2600:1011:B144:3F2D:BD93:43A8:D262:DBE9 (talk) 18:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Handled. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 18:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Reboot

This article erroneously refers to MW2019 as a soft reboot, but I'm unable to edit this page to correct it. Can someone help me out here? MasterHedgehog76 (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 September 2020

add raven as a primary developer since 2012 173.71.170.57 (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: See August 20th request for reasoning. -- ferret (talk) 21:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Listed platforms for COD 1 & 2

The page is locked for some reason I can't add this so if someone else could. COD 1 & 2 (The Finest Hour and The Big Red One respectively) were PS2 games and PS2 isnt' listed for those first two. I have them. In fact I have them all up to the recent 2020 Black Ops one. I have those 2 for PS2 then COD3 and onward on PS3 then PS4.174.61.111.165 (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Finest Hour and Big Red One are not the same as COD 1 & 2. Finest Hour and Big Red One are listed under "Other Games / Console Titles" where PlayStation 2 is appropriately denoted. -- ferret (talk) 21:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2021

CS:GO FPS Commands Wearableworld (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --Paul ❬talk❭ 09:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

"Divinium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Divinium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Divinium until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2021

I would like to edit so I can add the newest games in the franchise LesGo is lit (talk) 23:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2021

I am trying to edit the truth behind call of duty and how it is one of the best games Trejuans (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2021

Y'all forgot to add Cold War with the rest of the games. 75.57.104.21 (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

 Already done Not sure what IP means. Cold War is covered in both the lead and the Black Ops section. -- ferret (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2021

The information regarding the social media followings of Professional Call of Duty players does not have a proper source. It points to an article about PewDiePie, not a Call of Duty player. There appears for no exact basis for the information based on the source so it feels inappropriate to claim. 2601:1C0:6702:D3B0:DDE1:1FB5:F551:D512 (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done  melecie  t - 05:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Error

It says on the first part of "Main Series" section, under the ratings column, that the original Call of Duty game in 2003 was on the PS3. This is a typo that should say PS2, not PS3, because the PS3 was not released until 2006, so the original Call of Duty from 2003 was only released on the PS2 (which it doesnt even say, therefore leads me to believe its a typo or else they would include both consoles like later games that were available on both PS2 and PS3). 72.69.48.91 (talk) 04:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

It's not wrong. It was not released on PS2 or Xbox, but as a "Classic Title" on PS3 and Xbox 360 years later. -- ferret (talk) 10:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 50StarfishFifty. Peer reviewers: 50StarfishFifty.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KennethCordoba, Michaeldall.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ikey1349. Peer reviewers: Cornelius mastermind.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 25Manny.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

changes call of duty bo logo name

owend name 103.28.132.35 (talk) 02:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II (2022 video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Possible psyop

Should we address the fact that Call of Duty may be a psyop serving interests of the U.S. military, an issue that has received recent media attention? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

What the devil conspiratorial nonsense is this? Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 22:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

"World at War" is missing from the "World War II Games" section of this page

The game is set in WW2, covering the pacific theatre and the european theatre with American and Soviet points of view. It appears to be missing from the list. 207.237.193.57 (talk) 03:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

That is because it is narratively tied to and part of the Black Ops universe. -- ferret (talk) 03:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

'Aggregate review scores' table issue

Currently, not all review scores in the table display the associated platform, and citations for recent titles are missing. I suspect this is either an issue with the template or with Wikidata, but both are beyond my knowledge. FuwaSheep (talk) 10:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@FuwaSheep This was a module issue actually, as it was never updated for XSXS/PS5. Done now. -- ferret (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Missing Beenox

Missing in the "Devs' section Gamer27442 (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Nevermind Gamer27442 (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Can someone please update the logo

Call of Duty recently updated their logo, haven't seen any PR announcements but I haven't checked properly. the new logo is on all of their branding though. I don't have an account and even if i did i wouldn't be able to edit, so if someone could take on the liberty of doing that it would be helpful, thanks 2.103.187.54 (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Made an account to post the image, i cant so ill just post the link to where you can get the new logo

Call of Duty has officially changed its logo with the Season 4 update (sportskeeda.com) Disposableaccount111 (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Nvm it doesnt let you post links Disposableaccount111 (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing Fall 2021 F1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ikey1349 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cornelius mastermind.

— Assignment last updated by Marimilan (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Separate article for Warzone Mobile?

I've always been wondering why Warzone Mobile doesn't have its own separate article. Not enough traction due to the "Limited Release" phase, most likely? MikeTimesONE 12:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Revert

@Soetermans, can you please elaborate why my edit was reverted? I removed the links because the specific games were already link. Did you reverted it because of WP:MOST? If so i will revert your edit and re add the italics (WP:MOST is one of the few MOS subpages I haven't read for a while and forgotten, sorry). Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

The specific games originally linked in the lead were already linked at the Main series section. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

And also why is it hard to AGF (assume good faith)? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Both the links in the lede (first appearance of the titles) and the italics are appropriate and should have been maintained, so the revert is valid. I see also a small bit of prose was reverted as well, and that is also valid as SVG is an unreliable source per WP:VG/S. However, @Soetermans: really needs to do better about explaining their reverts. -- ferret (talk) 16:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Like I said in my original revert, it's hard to assume good faith here. Why are you remove italics throughout? Why are you removing links? Please stop pushing your revision and talk. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Always assume AGF mate. A sign of an AGF edit is a proper summary like the one I provided. You didn't provide a proper summary so I got confused. Also you warmed me in my talk page a bit too late (not that it's relevant anyway). Sangsangaplaz (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

So the double links are acceptable, never knew that. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking doesn't do a lot of explaining (or I am just not seeing anything). Sangsangaplaz (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

OVERLINK is mostly concerned with repeatedly linking the same things over and over. But "first occurrence" plus a main article link in the specific section is typically ok. Now, if you had the main article hatnote in the section and then *immediately afterwards* linked the game, that would be overdoing it. -- ferret (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. :) Sangsangaplaz (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 December 2023

They also have figures from Funko. 2601:8D:601:DE40:D49B:F594:CC9A:4AFD (talk) 20:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 21:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Could somebody please bring back the aggregate review table?

I am new here and don't know how to edit Wikipedia really or even if I am allowed to. Until a few months ago, there used to be a table of aggregate reviews and it seems like NegativeMP1 removed it because they did not think it was useful. However, it is something I and a few of my friends have found it very helpful to decide if a certain game in the history is good or not. We are all beginners and extremely casual gamers. So while the table may not be useful for experts, it helps people like me. Perhaps it can be moved to the bottom in a collapsible section as a compromise? Is it possible to bring it back? Deepengarg (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I went ahead and restored the aggregate reviews box for now, and the only reason I initially removed it was because it didn't look very good in the article on desktop. Maybe some day in the future I or someone else will reorganize the article, who knows, but for now it's back. NegativeMP1 18:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

@NegativeMP1 It's ugly that we have two tables but I'd argue the reviews template is the more common one on franchise articles, since it speaks to reception. But I suspect if you try to remove the other table someone might complain. Perhaps add a new column to the big table and add the Metacritics there? Then you could remove the review template. -- ferret (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for such a prompt reply and for considering my request! Deepengarg (talk) 05:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Update to cancelled titles

Can someone edit the cancelled titles page to include “Future Warfare”? It’s a game that’s been surfacing around which was what Ghosts was supposed to be but it got cancelled. It was kinda like an early Infinite Wardare and you can find gameplay of it surfacing around. It was developed by IW and Neversoft and it was called NX1 in production 92.4.211.43 (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I've went ahead and added the information related to the project to the cancelled titles section. λ NegativeMP1 22:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)