Talk:Bisley, Surrey

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Detached part

This parish still has a detached part! I'm not sure if this is the only such parish in England, but certainly the only I know about. Morwen - Talk 08:13, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are referring to the ecclesiastical entity and that is not uncommon. See http://www.achurchnearyou.com and type St Clement Danes (choose its top entry) in, for example.- Adam37 Talk 14:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the civil parish does have a detached part - see the map here. The only other one I'm aware of is Thorpe St Andrew in Norfolk, and that's only because the whole of the River Yare belongs to Norwich. John Womble (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bisley, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205173946/http://uk.rottentomatoes.com:80/celebrity/barry_evans/ to http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/barry_evans/#synopsis
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/reports/pdf/?inspectionNumber=255525&providerCategoryID=4096&fileName=
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513085819/http://www.nsc-bisley.co.uk/ to http://www.nsc-bisley.co.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100516183240/http://www.bisleyas.com:80/ to http://www.bisleyas.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bisley, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150531001532/http://www.nra.org.uk/common/asp/general/history2.asp?site=NRA to http://www.nra.org.uk/common/asp/general/history2.asp?site=NRA
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bisleyas.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]