Talk:Been Like This

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Been Like This article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Been Like This is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by N Ø at 15:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Meghan Trainor Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meghan Trainor, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meghan Trainor on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Meghan TrainorWikipedia:WikiProject Meghan TrainorTemplate:WikiProject Meghan TrainorMeghan Trainor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Been Like This appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Meghan Trainor had been a fan of T-Pain for a long time before they finally collaborated on the song "Been Like This" from her upcoming sixth major-label studio album, Timeless?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Been Like This.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 01:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

Been Like This
Timeless (Meghan Trainor album)

)

... that before T-Pain and Meghan Trainor collaborated on the song "Been Like This" from her upcoming album Timeless, he spent months seeking her husband and manager's help to surprise her? Source: People
- ALT1: ... that Meghan Trainor had been a fan of T-Pain for a long time before they finally collaborated on the song "Been Like This" from her upcoming sixth major-label studio album, Timeless (2024)? Source: Rolling Stone
- Reviewed 4 3 : Template:Did you know nominations/So It Goes..., Template:Did you know nominations/Can You See Me? (album), Template:Did you know nominations/Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori, ~~Template:Did you know nominations/Eriopis connexa~~

Moved to mainspace / Created by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 12:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Been Like This; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Reviewing-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double QPQs are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 10:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. I have added two more that I already had, which is kind of based.--N Ø 10:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been informed that I misinterpretted the backlog mode. It is one extra QPQ per nomination, not per nominated article. You only need three.

Both articles new enough and long enough.
Both articles have copyvio results consistent with your direct quotation style. No issues.
WP:ICs are used throughout. More than adequate citation is present.
Both articles are neutral and encyclopedic.
There is no image nominated.
- I see both use Fair use cover art. I did not evaluate this fair use.
QPQ more than good, per 04:21, 18 March 2024 comment above.
Hook is well-cited in the content of both articles.
- all good.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Been Like This/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 15:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pseud 14 (talk · contribs) 13:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while! I will be happy to take this up for review. I have a pending GAN of my own in case you want to take a look. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It really has been a while! I almost started missing the snakepit, lol. I will take a look at your article within the next few hours.--N Ø 12:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well written[edit]

Lead and infobox[edit]

A doo-wop song with contemporary influences, the song incorporates -- perhaps some tweaking as you mention "song" a second time after introducing it as a "doo-wop song"
reached numbers 15 and 24 on the Adult Top 40 and Mainstream Top 40 charts -- worth mentioning that these charts are in the US
In it, Trainor, alongside background dancers, performs -- Instead of "in it", maybe somewhere along the lines of It features Trainor alongside background dancers, performing a dance routine...

Background[edit]

which went viral on TikTok -- I would link viral to the appropriate term
"I worked with Meghan's husband and manager for months trying to surprise her for her birthday." -- is there a reason why months here is italicized in the quote?

The quote in the source has all caps for "months", since that would be considered shouting under Wikipedia convention I have substituted it with italics for emphasis.--N Ø 12:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Composition[edit]

Link programmed to Programming (music)

Release and promotion[edit]

In it, Trainor, alongside -- similar point as in the lead comments

Commercial performance[edit]

"Been Like This" peaked at numbers 15 and 24 on the Adult Top 40 and Mainstream Top 40 charts -- worth mentioning this is in the US (or Billboard)
I think the instances of issued dated is redundant maybe issued for [insert date] or singles chart dated [insert date]

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

Copyvio score of 12.3% is reasonable and attributed to quotations.
Reliable enough for the information being cited
Consistent date and proper reference formatting
Appropriate wikilinks where applicable

Spotchecks

Ref 1 - ok
Ref 5 - ok
Ref 12 - ok, AGF on quote (source cited is paywalled)
Ref 17 - ok
Ref 25 - ok
Ref 32 - ok

Broad in its coverage[edit]

All major aspects of the topic are broadly covered and is comprehensive.

Neutral[edit]

No issues on this front. Attributions provided where applicable.

Stable[edit]

No edits wars or content disputes from what I've checked.

Illustrated[edit]

File:Meghan Trainor - Been Like This.png - appropriately licensed and FUR provided.

Summary[edit]

Another solid work on Trainor-related articles. That will be all from me. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quality review, Pseud 14. I could really feel the prose getting improved while making the suggested edits. I hope you are having a great day!--N Ø 12:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]