Talk:Battle of the Siverskyi Donets/Archive 1

Archive 1

I cleaned up the article and divided it into sections

Looks clean now. Should be good to go. PilotSheng (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

The article refers to NY Times and other articles that quote Russian bloggers. In my opinion the original blog posts should also be linked - even when they are in Russian. 2001:1C00:2E23:1A00:8C97:51F8:8458:3656 (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Not really; the blogger might not be a WP:RS. -- Mindaur (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nothing prevents us from linking to a primary source for more information, especially when the it’s significance is validated by a secondary source used as a reference. We can link to an archived version as of the relevant date. —Michael Z. 15:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

The river

The current title should be edited for grammar: Battle of the Siverskyi Donets, following conventional English form for referring to rivers. The current phrasing makes it sound like a place name. If there are no objections in a day or so, let’s WP:BOLDly move the article while the RM discussion above continues. —Michael Z. 20:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

And why not Battle of the Donets (2022) (Battle of the Donets, in World War II (Donets (disambiguation)))? ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 05:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Changing the title is for another discussion. I’m only proposing correcting the grammar in the current title. Do you object? —Michael Z. 15:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

No.☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I’ll move the article now. You might want to chime in on #Requested move 16 May 2022, above. —Michael Z. 17:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

As the starter of the RM above, I support a move like this, at least for now. And I don't care if it happens right now. Super Ψ Dro 21:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)