Talk:Baby Tooth Survey

A fact from Baby Tooth Survey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after her Baby Tooth Survey showed kids took in strontium-90 from nuclear fallout, Dr. Louise Reiss's son picked up the phone and heard the caller say "This is John Kennedy, can I talk to your mom?"

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/January.

Wikipedia

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

British/Australian program in Australia

The CSIRO conducted an equivalent of this program in Australia and it was used to inform both the Australian government's decision to ask the British to cease testing (and exposing Australians to fallout) and the British decision to participate in the atmospheric test ban treaty. The study showed repeated, high levels of exposure to children in Adelaide, after the tests at Maralinga, and even higher levels of exposure across the country when the atmospheric hydrogen bombs were tested. There was a substantial documentary on ABC about it, around a decade ago, and it probably warrants not only it's own article, but a section in this one. It also mentioned that the Soviets conducted their own program, and it was what scared them into proposing the ban.--Senor Freebie (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

St. Louis Baby Tooth Study.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC) ++ The logo is NOT protected copywrite. You can tell (if you are trained in such matters) because it does NOT have the © symblol. This is from a letter ADDRESSED TO ME. Plaese don't wreck my work again. Tiptopper (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This made me really sad. How can we get this picture back again? Can we not have nontrivial logotypes at all in wikipedia, or is there some kind of "loophole"? If you photograph the your letter, does that photo count as copyright infringement? :C · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]