Talk:Autoweek

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AutoWeek's website

The link to autoweek's website seems to have broken. This link will work:

   http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage

This was due to the relaunch of this popular automotive enthusiast site. Check it out for latest car and motorsports news. Live coverage from the Detroit Auto Show (NAIAS).

Umm, www.autoweek.com redirects just fine. --Vossanova ^o< 16:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing new history section

Hello, the current History section of this article is lacking citations. I have compiled a brief history of Autoweek using multiple sources, which I have saved in my sandbox User:DetroitSteele/AwSandbox. As noted on my user page, I am an employee of Autoweek and aware of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. Because I have this conflict of interest, I would prefer not to make this direct edit myself. Would it be possible for another editor to review what I have put together and post the changes if you think it is better than the current history section? --DetroitSteele (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are likely now an ex-Autoweek employee, can you explain the recent direction to simply rehash press releases on electric cars as their primary output in the past 6 months? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.227.35 (talk) 02:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing new section on Editorial Direction

I've put together a brief section on the Editorial Direction of Autoweek. One of the sources is a blog, but I inquired about this as a WP:RS and it appears to be fine since the author is an authority on the topic (published writer and former employee). You can find that discussion here - WP:RSN#Does_this_blog_qualify_for_an_expert_exception.3F. The proposed addition is located in my sandbox User:DetroitSteele/AwEditorialStyleSandbox. As noted on my user page, I am an employee of Autoweek and aware of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. Because I have this conflict of interest, I would prefer not to make this direct edit myself. Would it be possible for another editor to review what I have put together and post the changes if you think it would add to the quality of the current Autoweek article? --DetroitSteele (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New section for shopautoweek.com

In my ongoing effort to improve the Autoweek article, I have drafted another section about a website that Autoweek began last year. It can be found in my sandbox here - User:DetroitSteele/AWshopautoweekSandbox. As noted on my user page and other posts above, I am an employee of Autoweek Media Group so this is a section I would prefer to have another editor review and/or post. I am always open to feedback if it appears changes or additions are necessary. Thank You! --DetroitSteele (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autoweek's Vinsetta Garage addition

I drafted a section to be added to the Autoweek article about their television show - Autoweek's Vinsetta Garage. It can be found in my sandbox here - User:DetroitSteele/AWVinsettaSandbox. As previously noted, I am an employee of Autoweek Media Group so this is a section I would prefer to have another editor review and/or post. I am always open to feedback if it appears changes or additions are necessary. --DetroitSteele (talk) 20:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autoweek info box, intro and external link section

I made some edits to the infobox along with the intro section to add some references and update information that is currently inaccurate. It can be found in my sandbox here - User:DetroitSteele/AWAboutSandbox. I also made edits to the external links section to include the other Autoweek sites mentioned in the article - User:DetroitSteele/AWExternalLinksSandbox. As previously noted, I am an employee of Autoweek Media Group so this is a section I would prefer to have another editor review and/or post. If it appears changes or additions are necessary I'd be happy to hear feedback. --DetroitSteele (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Circulation Data for Autoweek

I noticed that Autoweek's circulation data is now listed by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (North America) and would like to add this data to the infobox. I have created an updated infobox in my sandbox at User:DetroitSteele/AWInfoBoxSandbox. Please comment if there are any concerns with this addition. If not, I will likely make the addition on Thursday or Friday of this week.

--DetroitSteele (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autoweek 2013 updates

As of 2013, there have been a couple of changes within Autoweek. Their television show (Autoweek's Vinsetta Garage) is off the air, and their car-shopping site (shopautoweek.com) has merged with autoweek.com. I have made three proposed updates for the page that can be seen in my sandbox User:DetroitSteele/AWshopautoweek removal. The 3 edits are an updated final sentence of the opening section, adding a new sentence at the end of the History section, and removing links from the External Links section.

If someone could please make these updates for me, I would appreciate it as I have a conflict of interest.

--DetroitSteele (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done NealeFamily (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Autoweek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130107131305/http://www.vinsetta.com/ to http://www.vinsetta.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new image

As of September 18 2018 Autoweek has a new cover, I have tried submitting it and emailing from my email account associated with this publication. Please let me know how I get it added to this entry.

the ticket i submitted is: [Ticket#2018040910007972] Uploading our new cover image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myonemura (talk • contribs) 14:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]