Talk:Antė

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 December 2023. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles

Lithuania

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles

This page was proposed for deletion by Rrts (talk · contribs) in the past.
It was contested by Joy (talk · contribs)

Suggestion[edit]

Antė could be added to the infoboxes of the appropriate articles in the nickname field? Schazjmd (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deleting reinstated[edit]

Unless there is a clear valid justification for the stub/article to be maintained the nomination will be maintained. Removal of the nomination without providing a valid justification here will be considered VANDALISM.

1) There is no clear evidence that the article complies with the notability policy of WP as stated before;
2) The statement made in the article (one sentence) is missing a citation;
3) The Reference section created redirects to a commercial website which is selling names info for profit and can not be considered a credible source of information.

Regards
Louie (talk) 22:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rrts, you need to read WP:PROD, which states PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected. It must never be used simultaneously with a deletion discussion (AfD or FfD), and it may only be placed on a page a single time. Any editor (including the article's creator or the file's uploader) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD. Schazjmd (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd you are correct.

@Joy please ignore this section and accept my apologies.

Louie (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should also read the Alternatives to deletion part of the deletion policy. Do you have objections to my suggestion above? By adding the name to Antanas as a nickname, this page can become a redirect to that article. (It would also be in Anton, Antonio, and Antonijo but Antanas appears to be the primary target for a redirect.) Schazjmd (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That could be a possibility, I agree. But I can not see any encyclopedic relevance in those names individually considered attached exclusively to commercial websites. There are no valid citations or the ones in existence are not credible enough. Louie (talk) 23:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and nominate at WP:AFD then. Just don't restore the proposed deletion template. Schazjmd (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]