Jump to content

Talk:Alzheimer's disease and diet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Peer reviews from fellow classmates
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.


Dear My peer reviewers,

My name is Doyeon Koo and used my user name as Felis Koo. in this talk page. I improperly moved the sandbox out so my page was an orphan, did not properly show, and had other technical issues. I deleted my original page and moved the sandbox again to this article. However, I edited some stuff on my old page that I improperly created and now I lost that page. If you go to the history of time when the draft was due, it does not exactly look like what I had at the time I finished my editing. Dr. Potter said I should leave a note to this talk page so feel free to ask me any questions. My e-mail is [email protected]. Doyeon Koo (talk) 02:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Reviews

[edit]

1. Quality of Information: 2 – Has updated factual information but perhaps should include information about beta and tau proteins involved with the disease in addition to the diet.

2. Article size: 1 - Does not meet size requirement set by Dr. Potter

3. Readability: 2 – Readable

4. Refs: 2 – Cited properly, included PBMED links

5. Links: 2 – Sufficient Link to outside articles

6. Responsive to comments: 2- No comments

7. Formatting: 2 – neat concise page

8. Writing: 1 – Some grammatical errors

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 – Used real name

10. Outstanding?: 2 – Sufficiently describes the effects of diet on the disease

Total: 18 out of 20

JahedaK talk (1:26 PM, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. After your peer-review I have edited grammatical errors and expanded article size to meet the requirement. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC) _______________[reply]

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size:1 - Slightly below minimum

3. Readability:2 - Easy to follow

4. Refs:2

5. Links:2 - Just be sure to link the first mention of a term if you're going to link it

6. Responsive to comments:2

7. Formatting:1 - well organized, but the last section is too short or should be removed

8. Writing:1 - some incorrect grammar

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2

10. Outstanding?:2 - good job


Total: 17 out of 20

JacobKhouri (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. Based on the comments you made, I wrote more in the last section by including the western diet and compared how these two diet patterns affect Alzheimer's disease patients. I updated the article size to meet the requirement and edited some grammatical issues. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

_______________

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2 - nice guideline

4. Refs: 2 - more than 10 refs

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2 - very well organized

8. Writing: 1 - sentence flow problem

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2 - very outstanding


Total: 19 out of 20

JinOuKim (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. Based on the comments, I edited the sentence structure of my article to make it flow more fluently. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have summarized and merged into the main article were much of the content was already covered. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]