Talk:Advanced Research and Invention Agency Act 2022

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article title

@Tony1: I've just noticed you moved this to have (UK) as a suffix - is this needed? The Act has a very specific title and I can't imagine it's going to need disambiguated (nowhere else has an Advanced Research and Invention Agency). Wanted to check in case I'd missed something rather than just move it back, though. Andrew Gray (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. Are you willing to monitor legislation worldwide to ensure that another act with a similar title doesn't emerge? Tony (talk) 03:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tony1 If one comes along we can certainly disambiguate, but I don't think it will be likely to arise, to be honest - the title + year combinations are usually quite specific, so titles rarely get duplicated for this type of article.

Of the ~2000 post-1801 UK Acts we have articles on at the moment, I think only four others - Local Government Act 1974 (United Kingdom), Continental Shelf Act 1964 (United Kingdom), Royal Titles Act 1953 (United Kingdom) & European Communities Act 1972 (UK) are disambiguated in the title, in all cases because another Act of the same name has an article. (There's also Statute Law Revision Act 1893 (Canada) & Government of Ireland Act 1920 (constituencies) but both of these seem to be split out from the main article of that name to cover a specific aspect.) Andrew Gray (talk) 12:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So this would introduce an inconsistency. Tony (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that adding a (UK) suffix here is the inconsistency - looking at other comparable articles, almost two thousand don't have suffixes, and just a handful of special cases that require disambiguation do. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Legislation acknowledges a suffix as appropriate when disambiguation is needed, but not otherwise. Andrew Gray (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead if you really must; but I find it a disservice to readers in search. Tony (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - I've moved the page back. I'm not sure readers will be particularly confused, but just to be on the safe side I've added a short-description which explicitly states it's UK. Andrew Gray (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]