Talk:Academy for Mathematics, Science, and Engineering/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 07:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
The "Curriculum by Year" sections are entirely unsourced, as are the product development sequence (WP:GACR 2c), and these sections are in any case far too detailed to be of general interest in an encyclopedia article (GACR 3b).
References 20 (Tran petition), 21-22 (Niche), and 23 (SchoolDigger) all appear to be unreliable. References 31–37 (Middle States Association to MHRD admissions) all appear to be primary, as do references 39 (important dates) and 40 (enrollment). Other dubious or primary references include 44 (AMSE Info Session), 46 (state dept of education), 47 (school profile), 48 (AMSE grad req), 49 (UCSB paper that doesn't mention the school), and all the ones after that (all primary). That leaves the entire "Academics" section, the longest of the article, without any good sources (GACR 2b).
The image of the banner showing the school logo appears to be a copyright violation, as the logo itself is only usable under fair use (the earlier image), there is no fair use justification for having two versions of the logo, and taking a photo of a copyrighted image does not invalidate its copyright (GACR 6a).
I think this is very far from meeting Good Article criteria 2 and 3, and as such can be a quick fail (WP:GAFAIL #1). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)