Talk:AMA

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Ama
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Ama

Should we really have the mention of the Association of Members' Advocates in the article space? --Merovingian (t) (c) 09:18, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

Why not? (I don't know; I'm just asking.)

Atlant 12:24, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ama should redirect here[edit]

If you search for "ama," in lowercase, it does not take you here.

AMA can also stand for Asset Management Account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.97.44 (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont merge[edit]

I'd have to say don't merge. Ama contains articles and names that contain the exact word Ama. Due to limitations of the wiki software, you can't redirect all lowercase "ama" to this page. I've put a notice at the top of the other disambiguation page. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 14:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Merging such disambiguation pages is very commonly done, see, say, AMB, to pick one at random.—Ketil Trout 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is different; Ama is a name in itself. AMB only lists abbreviations and acronyms. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 22:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there is a difference between Ama words and A.M.A. words. There should be two pages, both disambiguation pages, with links to each other for clarity.--Bill.albing 13:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]