Jump to content

Talk:2023 Brovary helicopter crash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


To add to article

[edit]

Basic information to add to this article: the cause of the crash. If there was fog at the time of the crash, why not mention that? 204.11.186.190 (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by someone. Ref (chew)(do) 09:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody find sources non paid subscription?

[edit]

There are 2 sources in the article, and those 2 sources are subscription only. I've tried to look, but couldn't find any alternatives. Can anbody find a replacement for them? Enter Demoman (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Reuters and the CNN articles subscription free Caspian Delta (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are in fact 15 sources in the article, some used multiple times. But I'm not sure that the two you mention ([5] and [9]) are actually needed. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 10:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 January 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


2023 Brovary helicopter crashBrovary helicopter crash – Unnecessary disambiguation. There are no other 'Brovary helicopter crash' articles from other years. Compusolus (talk) 08:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Compusolus (talk) 09:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

S̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶: Oppose: Like the examples for Flight Number 1 in 1936, 1941, and 1962, still put the date in there, it makes more sense and would be useful in the future. ☭MasterWolf-Æthelwulf☭ (talk). 00:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'S̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶: Oppose That Prussian1872 (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Not that i hope another helicopter crashes at the same place, but just in case, i think we should continue to show the year. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

copied from RM/TR – robertsky (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.