A news item involving 2016 San Pablito Market fireworks explosion was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 December 2016.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Thanks for noting this, Appable. Per my comments below, I went ahead and boldly merged this in order to avoid confusion for our readers, as the subject of this article appears to be rapidly gaining attention in the news. I performed the merge in the proposed direction (2016 Mexico fireworks incident → 2016 San Pablito Market fireworks explosion) because I agreed that it was a more descriptive title. Mz7 (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to sound biased, but could we merge the other way around instead? Mine was created first. Please discuss, thank you. The brave celery (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I hear you. It looks like the merge was done this way because it was a more descriptive title. Also, my apologies for the duplicate—I searched but your article must have not been picked up yet. Ed[talk][majestic titan] 01:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies as well. I agreed that it was a more descriptive title and boldly went for it to avoid confusion for our readers. Would a history merge be possible? Mz7 (talk) 01:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]