Talk:2014–15 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 22:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Tony. I'll take on this review. I'll leave initial feedback either tomorrow or Saturday before I leave for a week-long vacation. When I get back on August 22nd, I'll leave more detailed feedback (or sooner if I can get some internet while I'm gone, albeit that's highly unlikely to occur). Sportsguy17 (T • C) 22:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On first glance, things are looking pretty good. Dablinks, reflinks, and checklinks show nothing of concern, and the images appear to be fair use, no copyvios, etc. I will give more detailed feedback next week, but it shouldn't be much more than minor issues with mechanics. Good job on this article. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 23:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking some time with this. I am confused by the fact that this is now on hold. There are no actions for me to take, making such a status a bit confounding.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was put on hold because if it's "On Review", it is assumed that it is actively being reviewed, but since I was away for a week, I put it on hold so that people would know that it is not actively being reviewed. "On Hold", at least to me, simply means that the reviewer is not actively leaving feedback and/or suggestions and corrections are being made.

Anyways, expect a detailed review in the next 2-3 days. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 03:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Sportsguy17: the standard meaning of "on hold" is that the article has been reviewed, and the nomination is being held open for the nominator to fix the issues that were raised. (See WP:GANI#Reviewing for more details.) As long as the review has been opened but the reviewer is still working on it, it is "on review". Also, it has been over a month since you worked on the review, and over three weeks since you last edited on Wikipedia. Under the circumstances, if you haven't returned within a week's time, we'll have to consider the review abandoned and put the nomination back into the reviewing pool. I hope you see this before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion[edit]

Since Sportsguy17 hasn't touched this review in almost a month and a half, and has not edited Wikipedia in a full month, I'm closing this review and putting the nomination back into the reviewing pool. As it will be the oldest unreviewed nomination, I definitely hope it will be picked up before the end of the GA Cup, which is currently ongoing. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]