Talk:2007 Brazilian Grand Prix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2007 Brazilian Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Formula One Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hamilton getting penalized

Can anyone write about this? I hear he may get penalized for using 2 sets of wets during practice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.104.62 (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BMWs and Williams fuel too cold

[1] Could affect the outcome of the WDC, so deserves some mention in the article?86.130.19.213 22:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dude just them be, even if there were "in regulation" Hamilton didn't have the pace to catch them anyway, just let Raikkonen enjoy his title in peace and no anguish, Raikkonen shuted up (as usual) and drove he did what he needed to do win, he deserves the title, and after all the talk and favouritsm from the FIA given to Hamilton he does not deserve to win. LET KIMI ENJOY HIT TITLE 99.247.17.188

What are you on about? All that guy's saying is to mention it, not talk about it. I agree it should have some mention. (90.194.82.51 22:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

that was not meant at him, it was meant as my opinion of the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone, Kimi worked his butt off for the title and potentially be taken away from him by Bernie or Max, nothing against Hamilton, but this would be totally Formula Farce, they already decided the constructors in court, not the drivers as well, and if Mosley thought that the spy didn't damage F1(which clearly it did) this would definitly damage F1's reputation as it shows the FIA hands out Titles 99.247.17.188

This is a page for dicussing the article, not a general forum talk page, I'm afraid. Obviously the potential appeal should be mentioned in the article, in a neutral, measured way. 4u1e 17:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]