Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 01:08 −483 Danbloch talk contribs (Undo good faith edits by GreenC. Please discuss on talk page before changing guidelines.) Tag: Undo
4 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Civility 21:03 0 Jc37 talk contribs (move paragraph - no text was changed)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 19:52 0 GreenC talk contribs (→Archiving: c/e #MiniEdit) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 19:50 +10 GreenC talk contribs (→Archiving: c/e #MiniEdit) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 16:00 +473 GreenC talk contribs (→Archiving: expand on guidance of archiving mainspace talk pages) Tag: Reverted
3 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 17:47 −165 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1222065949 by Valjean (talk) The intention is not bad, but the formulation might be confusing. In a very important way, neutrality means that Wikipedia takes no POV: it does not support any POV. It only describes them by putting them in perspective, providing the arguments without taking side, etc.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 17:41 +165 Valjean talk contribs (It is important to provide a delimitation immediately. This will prevent a large portion of the misunderstandings about NPOV.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 02:42 −65 Asilvering talk contribs (rewording footnote to clarify that this is specifically about burden/challenge, see talk page)
30 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:23 +139 BilledMammal talk contribs (Undid revision 1221462442 by Closed Limelike Curves (talk) It’s saying it can be used, if it is treated as a primary source - I think it is worth noting, as many would assume scholarly = secondary) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:18 −139 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (→Primary, secondary and tertiary sources: Makes it sound like scholarly journal articles describing experiments can't be referenced in Wikipedia...) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 02:03 −10 CanonNi talk contribs (→Accessibility: rm {{clear}}, no use)
29 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 05:15 −4 Danbloch talk contribs (→Examples of appropriately editing others' comments: MOS:OL)
- diffhist Module:Message box/configuration 03:25 −9 Pppery talk contribs (Per request on talk)