Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
30 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:23 +139 BilledMammal talk contribs (Undid revision 1221462442 by Closed Limelike Curves (talk) It’s saying it can be used, if it is treated as a primary source - I think it is worth noting, as many would assume scholarly = secondary) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:18 −139 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (→Primary, secondary and tertiary sources: Makes it sound like scholarly journal articles describing experiments can't be referenced in Wikipedia...) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers 00:44 +1 GrindtXX talk contribs (→Julian and Gregorian calendars: MOS:CONTRACTION)
28 April 2024
- Protection log 23:57 El C talk contribs changed protection settings for Template:Primary source inline [Edit=Require template editor access] (indefinite) [Move=Require template editor access] (indefinite) (High-risk template or module) (hist)
- diffhist Template:Primary source inline 08:59 −61 Aidan9382 talk contribs (Undid revision 1221172630 by CheezDeez32 (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Template:Primary source inline 08:59 +61 CheezDeez32 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 01:49 +71 Wizardman talk contribs (→Additional annotation: clarify)
26 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 0 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→See also: is a guideline)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 +104 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→Supplemental pages: surprised this isn't mentioned)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 16:29 −44 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (Undid revision 1220897388 by BeeboMan (talk) Beyond asking which governments (some would certainly be more reliable than others), there also the issue of political interference. The situation seems far to complex to add such a absolute statement) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:No original research 15:56 +44 BeeboMan talk contribs (→Reliable sources: Typically officially government websites/documents are also reliable for obvious reasons (thought do keep in mind that around sensitive topics, it may fair less)) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 15:04 +18 InTheAstronomy32 talk contribs (Add shortcuts) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit