Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
2 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 18:19 +203 David Eppstein talk contribs (→"Wikipedia is Not Censored" needs to be changed or deleted: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 13:33 +268 Pbsouthwood talk contribs (→"Wikipedia is Not Censored" needs to be changed or deleted)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 13:09 +452 Pbsouthwood talk contribs (→WP:INDISCRIMINATE list in Language education in the United Kingdom: Reply) Tag: Reply
1 May 2024
- diffhist Nation 17:08 −162 Yr Enw talk contribs (Weird edit summary, but resolving dubious tag by deleting multiculturalism. It’s not really necessary, the typical ethnic-civic typology will suffice.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Nation 16:27 0 Arminden talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Nation 16:27 +137 Arminden talk contribs (BS patrol: wokeness replaces thinking not.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 04:02 −1 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→"Wikipedia is Not Censored" needs to be changed or deleted: Rmv typo)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 01:56 +398 Cullen328 talk contribs (→"Wikipedia is Not Censored" needs to be changed or deleted: Reply)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 01:44 +541 2601:246:5a83:d090:8035:bfa6:c575:a041 talk (→"Wikipedia is Not Censored" needs to be changed or deleted: new section) Tag: New topic
30 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:23 +139 BilledMammal talk contribs (Undid revision 1221462442 by Closed Limelike Curves (talk) It’s saying it can be used, if it is treated as a primary source - I think it is worth noting, as many would assume scholarly = secondary) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:18 −139 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (→Primary, secondary and tertiary sources: Makes it sound like scholarly journal articles describing experiments can't be referenced in Wikipedia...) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 02:03 −10 CanonNi talk contribs (→Accessibility: rm {{clear}}, no use)
29 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not 15:48 +329 Matrix talk contribs (→Proposed addition to WP:NOTFILESTORAGE)
- diffhist Module:Message box/configuration 03:25 −9 Pppery talk contribs (Per request on talk)
27 April 2024
- diffhist Doyle Brunson 13:29 −355 Somarain talk contribs (source says 60) Tag: Visual edit
26 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 0 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→See also: is a guideline)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 +104 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→Supplemental pages: surprised this isn't mentioned)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 16:29 −44 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (Undid revision 1220897388 by BeeboMan (talk) Beyond asking which governments (some would certainly be more reliable than others), there also the issue of political interference. The situation seems far to complex to add such a absolute statement) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:No original research 15:56 +44 BeeboMan talk contribs (→Reliable sources: Typically officially government websites/documents are also reliable for obvious reasons (thought do keep in mind that around sensitive topics, it may fair less)) Tag: Reverted