Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
2 May 2024
- diffhist Customer service 00:27 +33 Pancho507 talk contribs (→See also: add Customer Service Assurance)
1 May 2024
- diffhist Public relations 12:50 −20 Nowa talk contribs (→Tactics: social media marketing now standard practice)
30 April 2024
- diffhist Corporate title 09:46 +301 125.237.84.72 talk (→Japan and South Korea: Someone "accidentally" removed the Japanese column; NPOV)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:23 +139 BilledMammal talk contribs (Undid revision 1221462442 by Closed Limelike Curves (talk) It’s saying it can be used, if it is treated as a primary source - I think it is worth noting, as many would assume scholarly = secondary) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 02:18 −139 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (→Primary, secondary and tertiary sources: Makes it sound like scholarly journal articles describing experiments can't be referenced in Wikipedia...) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 02:03 −10 CanonNi talk contribs (→Accessibility: rm {{clear}}, no use)
29 April 2024
28 April 2024
- diffhist Customer service 09:11 +2,366 103.44.173.213 talk (added more books and journals)
27 April 2024
- diffhist Sales management 22:03 −11 Fuddle talk contribs (new key for Category:Sales: "" using HotCat)
26 April 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 0 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→See also: is a guideline)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 23:17 +104 Jasper Deng talk contribs (→Supplemental pages: surprised this isn't mentioned)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 16:29 −44 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (Undid revision 1220897388 by BeeboMan (talk) Beyond asking which governments (some would certainly be more reliable than others), there also the issue of political interference. The situation seems far to complex to add such a absolute statement) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:No original research 15:56 +44 BeeboMan talk contribs (→Reliable sources: Typically officially government websites/documents are also reliable for obvious reasons (thought do keep in mind that around sensitive topics, it may fair less)) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m General manager 01:41 −14 JackFromWisconsin talk contribs (remove duplicate citation (same citation was listed twice)) Tag: Visual edit