Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 05:12, 9 June 2017 (Adjusting links to archived content). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:

ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified

The consensus required restriction in the Palestine-Israel articles case is modified to read as follows:

Editors are limited to one revert per page per day on any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. In addition, editors are required to obtain consensus through discussion before restoring a reverted edit. Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours. Reverts made to enforce the General Prohibition are exempt from the revert limit the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
Passed 9 to 0 by motion at 00:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 00:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified

Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man

After discussion with both parties, the Committee resolves that The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) be indefinitely banned from interacting with, or commenting on Bishonen (talk · contribs) anywhere on the English Wikipedia. This is subject to the usual exceptions.

Support
Euryalus, DGG, Doug Weller, GorillaWarfare, Opabinia regalis, Mkdw
Recused
Casliber, Ks0stm, Newyorkbrad
Inactive
DeltaQuad, Drmies, Callanecc, Kelapstick

For the Arbitration Committee, -- Euryalus (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man

Motion regarding User:1989

User:1989, formerly known as User:Blurred Lines, has been subject to a one-account restriction since 2014. Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, the one-account restriction for 1989  is rescinded. They are reminded that any alternate accounts and/or bots must adhere to WP:SOCK#LEGIT and WP:BOTPOL.

Support

Opabinia regalis, GorillaWarfare, Doug Weller, Mkdw, Ks0stm, Euryalus, Keilana, DeltaQuad

Not voting

Casliber, DGG, Kelapstick, Kirill Lokshin, Newyorkbrad

Inactive

Callanecc, Drmies

Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Motion regarding User:1989

Arbitration motion regarding discretionary sanctions

Resolved by motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment:

In the interest of clarity, the discretionary sanctions procedures described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions are modified as follows:

  • In the section Appeals by sanctioned editors: Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages...
  • In the section Modifications by administrators: No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without...

For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 13:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding discretionary sanctions