Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=reason for move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Ch'oe Sung-no (currently a redirect to Ch'oe Sŭng-no) → Ch'oe Sŭng-no (move · discuss) – Consistent use of diacritic. Without the diacritic it is ambiguous how it is spelled (sung -> 숭 vs sǔng -> 승). toobigtokale (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Boáz_Klartag → Bo'az_Klartag (currently a redirect back to Boáz Klartag) (move · discuss) – wrong spelling Gamesou (talk) 10:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Siege of Leningrad → Blockade of Leningrad (currently a redirect back to Siege of Leningrad) (move · discuss) – I propose to rename the main article to the "Blockade of Leningrad" instead of redirecting because it`s widely known in Soviet and later Russian historiography as the "blockade" (Russian: Блокада Ленинграда). Besides, here in countries of the former Soviet Union every family call it the "blockade" not the "siege" (especially those who survived). As there are many archive documents written in Russian, it`s rare to meet the term "siege". It can be confusing for researchers. Borisenko-ru (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
- Archcathedral Basilica of St. John the Baptist (Warsaw) (currently a redirect to St. John's Archcathedral, Warsaw) → St. John's Archcathedral, Warsaw (move · discuss) – Talk:Archcathedral_Basilica_of_St._John_the_Baptist_(Warsaw)#This_article_was_moved_to_an_incorrect_name Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested technical requests
- Like That (Future and Metro Boomin song) (currently a redirect to Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)) → Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song) (move · discuss) – Kendrick Lamar is credited as a main artist on the song, so his name should be in the disambiguator. Source: https://music.apple.com/us/album/like-that/1737149923?i=1737150439 98.6.144.50 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc.: here are some more sources of him being credited as a main artist: https://open.spotify.com/track/2tudvzsrR56uom6smgOcSf?si=90vqYEc1Rimvw6wVhBKraA&context=spotify%3Aplaylist%3A37i9dQZF1DX0XUsuxWHRQd, https://tidal.com/track/352641780 (you can look at the album here to see for track 6), and even the YouTube channel of one of the artists of the song himself: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bKBAA22Go. Thank you. 98.6.144.50 (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cinderella (Future and Metro Boomin song) (currently a redirect to Cinderella (Future, Metro Boomin and Travis Scott song)) → Cinderella (Future, Metro Boomin and Travis Scott song) (move · discuss) – Travis Scott is credited as a main artist on the song, so his name should be in the disambiguator. Source: https://music.apple.com/us/album/cinderella/1737149923?i=1737150446 98.6.144.50 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc.: here are some more sources of him being credited as a main artist: https://open.spotify.com/track/0hKtu53OlIFXVuYkZwcn3o?si=ZtnfMacUSvKHorJz6TkMEA&context=spotify%3Aplaylist%3A37i9dQZF1DX0XUsuxWHRQd, https://tidal.com/track/352641783 (you can look at the album here to see for track 9), and even the YouTube channel of one of the artists of the song himself: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=onP2eoO7byc. Thank you. 98.6.144.50 (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain → She'll Be Coming Round the Mountain (currently a redirect back to She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain) (move · discuss) – The apostrophe preceding the word "round" is not needed. Zacwill (talk) 22:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Only one source cited in the article has the song name in its title, and it uses "Around". The apostrophe seems needed to indicate the omission of the "A" at the beginning of that word. The Carl Sandburg source uses "Comin' Round", which also has an apostrophe, although in a different place. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fribourg railway station (currently a redirect to Fribourg/Freiburg railway station) → Fribourg/Freiburg railway station (move · discuss) – use of the official naming of this station because Fribourg is a bilingual city Swiss512 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- It seems highly unlikely to me that this dual name is really the common name - people probably call it one or the other, not both. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. It seems the name Fribourg/Freiburg is used by the different railways operators that stop at this station.
- Here are some examples:
- https://www.sbb.ch/fr/informations-voyages/gares/trouver-gare/gare-de-fribourg-freiburg.html
- https://www.bls.ch/en/freizeit-und-ferien/charter/flotte-rabe-515-mutz
- https://www.bls.ch/-/media/bls/pdf/fahrplaene/bahn/netzplaene/netzplan-s-bahn-bern.pdf
- https://www.tpf.ch/Portals/0/Images/Fichiers//Horaires%20et%20plans//Plans%20du%20r%C3%A9seau//2024/Plan%20RER%20(A6).pdf
- https://www.sbb.ch/content/dam/internet/sbb/fr/fahrplan/bahnverkehrsinformation/zuege-linien/plan-rer-fr-2023.pdf.sbbdownload.pdf
- Other articles have the station names in the two languages like : Murten/Morat railway station Sierre/Siders railway station and Biel/Bienne railway station. Therefore I think the article name should be changed. Swiss512 (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Congregational church (currently a redirect to Congregationalism) → Congregationalism (move · discuss) – This article discusses the tradition broadly rather than a particular church or churches. Move follows wiki naming conventions, see Presbyterianism vs Presbyterian polity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirkwillems (talk • contribs) 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the request to have the current title (and a sig). It hasn't been at Congregationalist church (with -ist) since 2004. SilverLocust 💬 07:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Dirkwillems: While this would follow the example of Presbyterian(ism/ polity), that example alone doesn't create a naming convention. It seems quite likely that there would be different views on how to title this and which article (if any) would be the primary topic for "Congregationalism" (it currently redirects to the other article, Congregationalist polity, as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT as asserted almost 4 years ago). This move is potentially controversial, so it would require a requested-move discussion, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 07:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the request to have the current title (and a sig). It hasn't been at Congregationalist church (with -ist) since 2004. SilverLocust 💬 07:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dashboard (visualization) (currently a redirect to Dashboard (computing)) → Dashboard (software) (currently a redirect instead to Dashboard (disambiguation)) (move · discuss) – Dashboard (software) is currently a redirect. This name would be more appropriate for Dashboard (visualization ) as it standardized it with Control panel (software) GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 20:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is that this would be incomplete disambiguation (WP:INCDAB), as other topics in Dashboard (disambiguation)#Computing and technology also consist of software. I think there should be some better disambiguator to use than this (or the previous Dashboard (business), which was underinclusive). On a side note, I have removed the extraneous space in the title you moved it to earlier, Dashboard (visualization ). SilverLocust 💬 21:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yampil, Vinnytsia Oblast → Yampil (move · discuss) – Old undiscussed move not necessarily in accordance with WP:PRIMARY RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yampil → Yampil (disambiguation) (currently a redirect back to Yampil) (move · discuss) – see previous RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RadioactiveBoulevardier can you find a Diff (see Help:Diff § Internal links) to the old move? I think this might need to be discussed? microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- [1]
- Well, technically I don’t see the issue. It’s an undiscussed move in a remote corner and there’s no hard deadline to grandfather the move in. There is a solid WP:PRIMARYTOPIC argument (if you exclude the war-related coverage of Yampil, Donetsk Oblast) so RMUM why not?
- RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RadioactiveBoulevardier: You appear to be requesting to revert this move from 2007 (95 edits ago). That is more than enough to be is a stable title for WP:TITLECHANGES / WP:RMUM / WP:SVTRT. You'll need to open a requested move, which you can do by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 03:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- NoHo West → NOHO West (currently a redirect back to NoHo West) (move · discuss) – Official capitalization is "NOHO" not "NoHo" according to the official website Keizers (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- We don't match all-caps stylisms, only initialisms. See MOS:ALLCAPS. "NoHo" (ie. North Hollywood) is correct here. 162 etc. (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- George Warren Brown School of Social Work → Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis (move) – the name of the school has changed due to changes in the programs offered, refer to their website to see this new name listed: https://brownschool.wustl.edu/ Vicvicand (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vicvicand: any third party independent and reliable sources to support WP:NAMECHANGE? – robertsky (talk) 02:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Median state → Median kingdom (currently a redirect back to Median state) (move · discuss) – The term "kingdom" is more common and natural as evidenced in the article itself. Mawer10 (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- The two most common terms appear to be Median empire followed by the current name, Median state. And until recently, the current name held the absolute lead. (I guess the issue with both Median kingdom and Median empire is that neither was the name for the whole period this entity existed). Noting as well that the real name for this appears to be just Media, but that would require a disambiguator and it's hard to assess how common it is relative to the other terms. In any case I don't think this is uncontroversial. — Amakuru (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: A search on Google Scholar shows that results for "Median state" do not always refer to the Median political entity, furthermore it is not very common to refer to political entities from the Ancient Era as "states". On the other hand, a search for "Median kingdom" always gives the correct results. "Median Empire" is also a valid title, I would support it too. Mawer10 (talk) 22:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- The two most common terms appear to be Median empire followed by the current name, Median state. And until recently, the current name held the absolute lead. (I guess the issue with both Median kingdom and Median empire is that neither was the name for the whole period this entity existed). Noting as well that the real name for this appears to be just Media, but that would require a disambiguator and it's hard to assess how common it is relative to the other terms. In any case I don't think this is uncontroversial. — Amakuru (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)