User talk:Lemonaka

This is Lemonaka's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 90 days

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Vandalism information

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

3.12 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 00:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: clear this, you show me an IDHT attitude.

Because true fighters dare face the sorrows of humanity, and look unflinchingly at bloodshed.——WMLO (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@維基百科最忠誠的反對者 Okay, you dare to show up here. Let's be harsh since you cannot take advice, you are acting like an editing warrior on another project, stop ASAP, or you may be banned if that functionaries are working well.
Oh, you are a Christian, then take please read bible a little more.

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."--Matthew 5:17-5:20 -Lemonaka‎ 00:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to rely solely on your personal knowledge from the English Wikipedia and disregard the policies of the Chinese Wikipedia, while emotionally blackmailing me based on your own morality, I will forgive you because it is evident that you need more experience to understand that my actions align with the teachings of The Lord.

“Omnia non sunt partium, non est cupiditas gloriae vanitatis, sed in humilitate animo, unusquisque alium prae se existimet. Unusquisque non tantum suorum negotiorum sit curialis, sed etiam alienorum.”---Philippians 2:4-2:5

“Quidquid agitur, ne querellam effundatis aut contentiones suscitetis, ut irreprehensibiles et sinceri sitis, Dei filii immaculati in hoc depravato et perverso saeculo. Vos in hoc saeculo tanquam lux manifestamini, viam vitae ostendentes, ut in die Christi mei gloriari possim quod non frustra cucurri aut inaniter laboravi.”---Philippians 2:14-2:16

By the way, you seem to have forgotten to capitalise "bible". For Christians, God's guidance is always holy. But I think the good Lord will surely forgive us for our unintentional offence :) ——WMLO (talk) 06:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't read the Bible very often. So my understanding of Latin (I haven't used it for a while) may not be as good as yours. If there are any grammatical fallacies, please point them out. Thanks！ WMLO (talk) 06:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well a block, what you deserved even here, please use you common sense, or let's talk about following section.
“Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.” Revelation 2:16 -Lemonaka‎ 08:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about forgiveness 😂, lmao. It's we forgive your incompatibility, your blindness and rogue actions. If your behaviours were here, an indef would be sooner.
But for god's sake
"Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake."
--Matthew 5:11
Then we should do the following, right?
"Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you."
--Matthew 5:12 -Lemonaka‎ 09:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should repost the bureaucrat's statements defending Mys 721tx. They banned me with unclear reasons and inexplicably intended to suspend RFDA. Even a fool knows what they're up to. If I can be banned by Mys 721tx for a month, I can certainly endure a decision even more absurd than this. History shows that the community will inevitably stand on my side😹. May Lord forgive them, amen.——WMLO (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@維基百科最忠誠的反對者 You are blocked for outing others, which is something I despised most. Outing others and sockpuppetry are the reasons why I reported PlanespotterA320 to meta-wiki and WMF, taking me months to collect evidence on and off wiki. So just fuck away if you tried to troll me, may God forgive me for my foolish, who used to believe you are a trusted editor with good faith. -Lemonaka‎ 14:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a moment to think about whose personal information I've uncovered? If it's that group, even their own rules say that users can be quoted. If it's the age of the administrator, his entry or memorial page existed in the Chinese wikipedia until last year.

Even if I mentioned it unintentionally, that doesn't constitute a direct ban on my talk page. And even if J.Wong wanted to make it so serious, why didn't he block my comment? I am disappointed in your position on me, but you are right about one thing. I have never doubted that there is so much malice in my community. ——WMLO (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave me alone! I don't want to get involved in your messy political fights at all. More comments are considered as harassment, stop wasting your valuable time. -Lemonaka‎ 14:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will say one last thing. Where the gears of the Chinese Wikipedia go back to the right place and prove me right. At that time, please give me your blessing. Thank you. WMLO (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]