Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| One sided fight with Huldra | 1 December 2021 | 0/0/0 |
| Case name | Closed |
|---|---|
| Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
| Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
| Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
One sided fight with Huldra
Initiated by Bob drobbs (talk) at 23:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Bob drobbs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Huldra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zero0000&diff=next&oldid=1058173389
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zero0000&diff=next&oldid=1058174873
Statement by Bob drobbs
I created the article on David Collier (political activist) in good faith with the belief that the subject met notability standards. It's currently in the process of AFD with mixed results. I only learned after the fact that there's drama between him and some users.
In what might be our first interaction ever, Huldra says in the AFD I should be topic banned for creating this page.[1]
Later, I left a message on her talk page informing her that accusations she's made against the topic of this article[2] could be a BLP violation and in future AFD discussions to please stick to notability instead of sharing her personal thoughts about the subject. Her response was to revert my message.[3]
On another talk page, she seems like she's being intentionally combative.[4] I ask her if she's trying to start a fight. [5] She claims that I'm the one who started the fight, by creating the page, and that I could end the fight by deleting it.[6] I give her a final notice to please apologize, or at least agree to stop this fight, or else I'd take it to arbitration.[7] Her response was to ask if I'd delete the page.[8]
So, we're here.
- Q: Not sure this is the right place, but does this action by Selfstudier cross the line into canvassing?[9]
Statement by Huldra
User:Bob drobbs: I state on my user-page that I am female, please refer to me as such.
As I assume the arb.com knows, David Collier has a blog he uses (among other things) to doxx any Wikipedia editor he disagree with. (No I will not link to any of that; arb.com-members: feel free to contact me for links iff you need it).
Bob drobbs then start an article about him; calling him a "political activist." The article is up for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Collier (political activist). I the mean time, Bob drobbs uses the fact that David Collier has an article as an argument that Collier's views are notable [10]
Please topic ban Bob drobbs from any further edits in the I/P area; the area is difficult enough as it is, we don't need this, Huldra (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Bob drobbs; thank you for getting my gender right
- I still stand by my opinion that you should be topic-banned from the I/P area of Wikipedia, Huldra (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Statement by Selfstudier
WP:DR Selfstudier (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Apparently filer does not understand WP:DR and might read the second para of the big box at top left of this page.Selfstudier (talk) 00:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Statement by GizzyCatBella
All the way to the top? Why? - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Statement by User:力
As hinted already, this should be at arbitration enforcement. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
One sided fight with Huldra: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
One sided fight with Huldra: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)