User talk:Goldemold

Warning

Please wait until your article is accepted before adding it to lists.

Regarding edits such as these where you appear to be removing my comments out of spite, such edits are not tolerated. Please stop undoing my edits.

– Thjarkur (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop reverting me out of spite? – Thjarkur (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldemold (talk • contribs) 13:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny, but please note that Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you're expected to behave collegially. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Circus clown. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Goldemold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it's me, Goldemold. I've had a year and a half to reflect upon my actions, and now I think I'm ready to make a formal apology.

I'm really sorry for disrupting Wikipedia, and even more sorry for creating several other accounts to justify my disruption. That was many years ago, and now I'm aware that this type of tenacious editing compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, because it wastes the staff's time and energy. I used to think what I did was funny, but it definitely isn't.

As such, I wish to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. This time, instead of returning to the exact same antics that got me into this mess in the first place, I will do everything I can to stop vandalism and other kinds of disruptive editing by patrolling the "Recent Changes" page and reverting it whenever I see it. If I get more experienced at Wikipedia, I might even start making more substantial positive contributions.

I hope you will forgive me for my past mistakes and give me a second chance. Thank you. Goldemold (talk) 19:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, it's me, Goldemold. I've had a year and a half to reflect upon my actions, and now I think I'm ready to make a formal apology.

I'm really sorry for disrupting Wikipedia, and even more sorry for creating several other accounts to justify my disruption. That was many years ago, and now I'm aware that this type of tenacious editing compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, because it wastes the staff's time and energy. I used to think what I did was funny, but it definitely isn't.

As such, I wish to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. This time, instead of returning to the exact same antics that got me into this mess in the first place, I will do everything I can to ''stop'' vandalism and other kinds of disruptive editing by patrolling the "Recent Changes" page and reverting it whenever I see it. If I get more experienced at Wikipedia, I might even start making more substantial positive contributions.

I hope you will forgive me for my past mistakes and give me a second chance. Thank you. [[User:Goldemold|Goldemold]] ([[User talk:Goldemold#top|talk]]) 19:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, it's me, Goldemold. I've had a year and a half to reflect upon my actions, and now I think I'm ready to make a formal apology.

I'm really sorry for disrupting Wikipedia, and even more sorry for creating several other accounts to justify my disruption. That was many years ago, and now I'm aware that this type of tenacious editing compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, because it wastes the staff's time and energy. I used to think what I did was funny, but it definitely isn't.

As such, I wish to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. This time, instead of returning to the exact same antics that got me into this mess in the first place, I will do everything I can to ''stop'' vandalism and other kinds of disruptive editing by patrolling the "Recent Changes" page and reverting it whenever I see it. If I get more experienced at Wikipedia, I might even start making more substantial positive contributions.

I hope you will forgive me for my past mistakes and give me a second chance. Thank you. [[User:Goldemold|Goldemold]] ([[User talk:Goldemold#top|talk]]) 19:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, it's me, Goldemold. I've had a year and a half to reflect upon my actions, and now I think I'm ready to make a formal apology.

I'm really sorry for disrupting Wikipedia, and even more sorry for creating several other accounts to justify my disruption. That was many years ago, and now I'm aware that this type of tenacious editing compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, because it wastes the staff's time and energy. I used to think what I did was funny, but it definitely isn't.

As such, I wish to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. This time, instead of returning to the exact same antics that got me into this mess in the first place, I will do everything I can to ''stop'' vandalism and other kinds of disruptive editing by patrolling the "Recent Changes" page and reverting it whenever I see it. If I get more experienced at Wikipedia, I might even start making more substantial positive contributions.

I hope you will forgive me for my past mistakes and give me a second chance. Thank you. [[User:Goldemold|Goldemold]] ([[User talk:Goldemold#top|talk]]) 19:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Checkuser information: I see no evidence of recent block evasion. The reviewing admin should still check in with the blocking admin, Ivanvector, but my investigation shows Goldemold is likely being truthful with regard to refraining from any further sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 19:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Ivanvector as blocking admin, in case they missed the last one.

Goldemold, I'm inclined to accept this. Would you be okay with an indefinite single-account restriction, appealable to WP:AN in six months? If you concur that's fine, I'll give Ivan a day or so and otherwise go ahead and unblock you. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Nosebagbear, I didn't get Yamla's ping, but if they checked and didn't see anything of concern then I have no objections as the blocking admin. @Goldemold: per this website's terms of use, you are required to disclose if any person or entity is paying you for any edit to Wikipedia. Paid editing is allowed but only if you comply with the paid editing policy. If you have been paid for any edit to Wikipedia, or expect to be paid for any future edit, you must say now who you expect to be paid by. If not, please confirm now that you are not being paid to edit Wikipedia. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:58, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: I agree to use this account only, and also refrain from paid editing entirely (I am currently not being paid for editing Wikipedia). Thank you. Goldemold (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]