User talk:Cheesy McGee

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Russian reversal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Russian reversal was changed by Cheesy McGee (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861746 on 2017-04-06T16:01:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zak Elbouzedi

The article Zak Elbouzedi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zak Elbouzedi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Zak Elbouzedi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Zak Elbouzedi

Hello Cheesy McGee,
I assume that you genuinely want to contribute to the Wikipedia project. However adding text like this "Someone add a bio thing, I don't know how, and potentially add more info. Also, remove this once done. Cheers. -Cheesy McGee (page creator)" does not inspire confidence. Perhaps if you want to write Wikipedia articles, you might be like to consider the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process.
Or to put it another way, howay man Cheesy, gan canny the neet.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at North Korea and weapons of mass destruction. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hornetzilla78 (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Curse of Aaron Ramsey

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Curse of Aaron Ramsey, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zak Elbouzedi

The article Zak Elbouzedi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Mirren and Queen of the South (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2017-18 Elgin City F.C. season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Darren Smith, Peter Watson, Gary Phillips, Bruce Anderson, Craig Thomson and Michael McKenna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zak Elbouzedi

The article Zak Elbouzedi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He hasn't played in a fully professional match. WP:FOOTYN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zak Elbouzedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zak Elbouzedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Elbouzedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel MacKay

Hello, Cheesy McGee. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Daniel MacKay, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Daniel MacKay to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

– 333 -blue, 02:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zak Elbouzedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zak Elbouzedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Elbouzedi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dial911 (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Harper moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cameron Harper, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Dial911 (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alasdair Stark

The article Alasdair Stark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He hasn't played in a fully professional match, i.e. he hasn't played for the Caley Thistle first team. WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Craigen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron Harper (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cameron Harper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cameron Harper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cheesy McGee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Craig Davison (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Cheesy McGee, thanks for creating 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season

The article 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to indicate notability of season and only valid content is lead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blethering Scot 20:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two out of three sources you have added do not back any claims in article and one is only to say fixtures will be announced. In addition they are not sources that would be enough to define whether something meets WP:GNG and at present this article is not of the standard required to be on wikipedia, nor is it clear its notable. I will take this to AFD if you do not improve article and add notable sources.Blethering Scot 21:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lewis Ferguson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Manuel Neuer. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fort William and Fort George (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube Boxing Championship moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, YouTube Boxing Championship, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Williams (footballer). Giant Snowman 19:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anthony Low (footballer)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anthony Low (footballer), Cheesy McGee!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftspace and transfer back if it has WP:INLINECITED sources and meets WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Robertson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018–19 Hashtag United Season

The article 2018–19 Hashtag United Season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSEASONS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 North of Scotland Cup

Please add your references. Boleyn (talk) 07:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 North of Scotland Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018–19 North of Scotland Cup, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 wumbolo ^^^ 18:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at People's Vote, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alisdair Sutherland. Giant Snowman 19:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001). Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 12:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cheesy McGee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Jack_Brown_(footballer,_born_2001)

Hello Cheesy McGee I have added projects United Kingdom, Football, Biographies, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001) (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree with SportingFlyer, it is just too WP:TOOSOON for me for a guy that played for such a short time, and GNG wise it totally fails it. Either add references in, or wait until he has a better minutage in games.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Brown (footballer, born 2001), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jermain Defoe. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Craig Reid and Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ross Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matheus Machado moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matheus Machado, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:YouTube Boxing Championship

Hello, Cheesy McGee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "YouTube Boxing Championship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish League Three moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scottish League Three, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matheus Machado (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matheus Machado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matheus Machado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 07:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. Season

Hello, Cheesy McGee,

Thanks for creating 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. Season! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add refs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul McMullan and Anthony McDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Charlie Trafford. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Rose and Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul McMullan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Carson (footballer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, David Carson (footballer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Owain Fôn Williams. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Low (footballer)

Hello, Cheesy McGee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Low".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Carson (footballer) (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and needs to be much better sourced for a BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Carson (footballer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Carson (footballer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 06:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matheus Machado (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matheus Machado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matheus Machado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018–19 North of Scotland Cup

Hello, Cheesy McGee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018–19 North of Scotland Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolay Todorov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Hercher

Hello, Cheesy McGee,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Alan Hercher for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a [decision] to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Hercher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Hercher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Hercher (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolay Todorov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matheus Machado (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also not clear if he passes WP:NFOOTY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matheus Machado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matheus Machado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 00:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Scottish League Three

Hello, Cheesy McGee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Scottish League Three.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matheus Machado (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CaptainEek were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More than 2 sources will be needed to show notability. Furthermore, as this is a biography of a living person, the sourcing requirement is much stricter.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matheus Machado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matheus Machado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Graeme Shinnie, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 01:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Alisdair Sutherland article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 10:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got it off of Transfermarkt. Saw that the stats hadn't been updated in some time, and it said that he had a loan spell with Rothes last season, and was on one this season, prior to abandonment. Cheesy McGee (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dean Ebbe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, your stats had no basis whatsoever in reality - see Soccerway. Giant Snowman 17:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Charlie Trafford, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 18:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding your own opinions, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2020. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Black Kite (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Trafford. Giant Snowman 10:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Subway (restaurant). You've received plenty of recent warnings about this; enough that I can't imagine why you'd continue to add unsourced material unless you're either not paying attention to your Talk page or simply don't care. DonIago (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Hoban moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniel Hoban, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Draper moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nick Draper, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Hoban has been accepted

Daniel Hoban, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Draper (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Draper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Draper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71). BilCat (talk) 01:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elgin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Gorman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Gorman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Gorman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Draper (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not indicate that the subject can pass the football notability guidelines as it does not show that he has made an apperance in a fully professional league. (See that page for more information.) The general notability guideline has not been met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Draper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Draper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 15:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Guy Kerr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Guy Kerr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wallace Duffy. Giant Snowman 18:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated addition of unsourced content to BLPs without providing any sources, despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 09:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheesy McGee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

been blocked for updating football biographies of current players. I request that I get unblocked as most of the updates were on previously unsourced pages, in addition to that I update based on Transfermarkt stats (which most mods dislike for some reason), as the other site editors use either doesn't give correct goal statistics and/or it has a very small selection of leagues recognised, so it's impossible to update a players article which has been collecting dust unless you use transfermarkt or are in the know of that one specific player. As for the lack of sources, most of the time it entirely slips my mind as I just want to do a quick update and be on my way to the next article that's been sitting on the shelf collecting dust, and other times I just feel it's a massive hassle to do it on my mobile. Sorry if this last part sounds like a bit of a rant, but for the love of Christ, can you stop undoing edits because of no sources, when you just REWROTE WHAT I DID AND PUT SOURCES! If it's that big a deal that you want to make your contribution, either A) Get there first, or B) Put the sources in yourself. It's a waste of both my time and your time if you undo my work just to put it back in word for word yourself. I am in no way shape or form a vandal on the football side of wikipedia (though according to some bots I allegedly am, but those bots are hopeless at detecting fact from fiction) and all my inputs have been (albeit without sources, as explained above) helpful and useful to making sure players biographies are up to scratch and not stuck on a previous update from 4 years ago. Thank you for your time, hope to hear back from whoever's in charge of unbanning. Cheesy McGee (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm confused. You seem to be attempting to justify having your block extended indefinitely rather than demonstrating you understand WP:RS and WP:CITE and committing to providing citations for all of the edits you make. Are you really, really sure you wish to take this approach?!? Yamla (talk) 10:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you admit to use a site (Transfermarkt) that you know is deemed unsuitable (because it's not a reliable source), and you admit to editing biographies without using sources, and you think that behaviour, which has been ongoing for years (given the amount of warnings you have collected for the same conduct from various other editors/admins), and you do not see a problem with any of that? Giant Snowman 10:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snowman, I'm not trying to start a fight here, but why is Transfermarkt "not a reliable source" when the other sites used for the biographies etc are far less useful when they carry not even half the clubs listed by Transfermarkt. Been to way too many players to update them, looked at the site and compared it to Transfermarkt, and there's an absolute ton of clubs been skipped out or massive chunks of "inactivity" because said club is not in the other sites database. As said prior, the sources on mobile are a hassle, as I already have the long dash in the copy paste slot or articles on said player are non existent making it impossible to put a source to the name. There has been no vandalism committed whatsoever, and I keep getting called up for that or unsourced material (like now) even though None. Have. Been. Vandalism. I want to help, but it does my nut when I get pinged for something literally nobody would care about. Seriously, who would go to an obscure 5 years retired Scottish footballer's wiki page and look for sources linking to a site which has questionable stats and skips seasons because a club isn't in their database? To be brutally honest, it's a joke. I'd understand if I was going onto Lionel Messi's page and adding Nairn County with 153 goals in 32 appearances, but I'm not, I'm adding clubs and clubs only based on comparing the two sites. If it gives stats, then I'll put them in, but if not, I'll leave it blank. But getting on my back every single time I make a constructive update over a small link at the bottom of the page that nobody will ever go to, is ridiculous. Cheesy McGee (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting us know. I have extended your block indefinitely. Any admin is free to unblock you once you demonstrate a clear understanding of WP:RS and WP:CITE and commit to always citing your stats edits with reliable sources accepted by Wikipedia consensus. This is not an infinite block; it may be lifted today or tomorrow or next year, whenever you demonstrate a clear understanding and commitment to our policies. --Yamla (talk) 11:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is saying these kind of edits are vandalism - but they are disruptive. As Yamla says, and as you have been advised multiple times in the past, you need to review and understand WP:V and WP:RS, as well as WP:BLP. Giant Snowman 15:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have read through the rules and understand not to make any unsourced edits, and would like to request to have my restrictions lifted. Cheesy McGee (talk) 01:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 36434

UTRS appeal #36434 has been declned.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. It does not look to me like you unblock request was ignored-- it was declined. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. (Please do not criticize or find fault with anyone else. Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.) Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second Unblock Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheesy McGee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have read through both the articles posted about sourcing and the likes. I apologise if any of my edits were disruptive, however, that was never the intent of the edits, I just wanted pages to be up to scratch. From here on out I will provide sources to my edits. Going off on a slight tangent here to also say that I also appeal the blocking due to being a primary editor on a page which gets limited to no editorial traffic, and hasn't seen any updates at all in the time I've been out of action. Once again, I promise that I will source any additions I make to any page. Hell, even if you reduce it to a set date, I'd be happy, updating wiki pages has eleviated the boredom of COVID and being out of work, and having a indefinite block that could end who knows when, is making me frustrated with A) Myself, for shooting myself in the foot for not providing sources for my many edits, and B) The fact the page I main on has been collecting dust because of my actions. Also, on a sidenote, I'd like to also apologise for the claims of my previous request being ignored, it was a heat of the moment accusation after a little over a fortnight of radio silence, when in reality, I doubt it reached anyone's inboxes. Thanks, Cheesy McGee (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining per the discussion below this request. Future unblock requests should include a solid explanation of what a reliable source is. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm inclined to unblock, but could you first give a brief explanation of what a reliable source is, in your own words? You might find it helpful to give examples of reliable and unreliable sources as part of your answer. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A reliable source would be where one source is saying the same (or similar) thing as multiple other sources. In this context Transfermarkt is a less reliable source as on most occasions it does not repeat what the other sources of information are saying on the player in question. Cheesy McGee (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutely not what a reliable source is. Hint: WP:RS goes into some detail. --Yamla (talk) 20:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, if you ever get unblocked, WP:RSP usally goes into the problems Wikipedia has with a specific source. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As Yamla already said, wrong answer. Try again. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, for a source to be reliable, it has to be from a non-biaed and known author/publisher, as opposed to a largely unknown website, book or author, or an article which is more opinionated as opposed to a factual one. The work itself can also be challenged on its reliability if it's from say, a leaflet or a poster as opposed to a biography. Cheesy McGee (talk) 22:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Apologies again, I messed that up, the segment "an article which is more opinionated as opposed to a factual one" should be flipped around. Cheesy McGee (talk) 22:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, while this is a bit of an improvement over the previous answer, it's still wrong. I'm going to decline the open unblock request now. I'd suggest that you study WP:RS more carefully and look through some of the other pages linked in its See also section before opening a new unblock request with an answer to this question. You may also find it helpful to read through discussions at WP:RSN to get a sense of what discussions about specific sources' notability look like in practice. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I may, I would like to forward a third attempt on being unblocked. Doing deeper research in the page Rosguill suggested, I've realised that infact, for a source to be deemed "reliable", the source cannot be from a non-self published source either on a particular topic or on themselves, nor can it be from a questionable source that is known for its unreliability in fact checking, other wiki articles can also be classified as unreliable. Such examples of self-published "sources" are; forum posts/comments, books, social media posts, or personal blogs. In terms of self-published articles, they under no circumstances, should be used for articles on living people. Thank you for your time, if anyone does read this. Cheesy McGee (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not correct. See for example, WP:ABOUTSELF. Frankly, you just aren't getting it. I'm not sure what the problem is. Are you not reading the policies? Are you not following the links to understand more about the various bits? Are you trying to just find the key words that might result in your block being lifted, rather than trying to comprehend what the policies say? This is deeply concerning, and really quite time consuming. I'm unsure what to suggest here. We've repeatedly told you to read the policies, but it doesn't seem to have helped. I believe you could be a constructive member of the community, but not when it's this hard to get you to understand WP:RS. I'm tempted to simply revoke talk page access at this point, but maybe someone else has some ideas? --Yamla (talk) 18:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, hope you're doing well, I would like to forward another request to be unblocked. It's been some time (longer than you might prefer, but hey ho). A reliable source is one that comes from a site which isn't based around rumours, gossip, promotions, self published sources are also not regarded as reliable nor are sources which have a record of poor reliability in terms of fact checking. On the contrary, mainstream media would count as a reliable source which includes blog post and magazine articles by professionals. Fingers crossed this gets seen, and to make sure I will file another appeal alongside this. Cheers, Cheesy McGee (talk) 02:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cheesy McGee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi all, hope you're doing well, I would like to forward another request to be unblocked. It's been some time (longer than you might prefer, but hey ho). A reliable source is one that comes from a site which isn't based around rumours, gossip, promotions, self published sources are also not regarded as reliable nor are sources which have a record of poor reliability in terms of fact checking. On the contrary, mainstream media would count as a reliable source which includes blog post and magazine articles by professionals. Thanks, Cheesy McGee (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Welcome back. Per our agreement below, as an unblock condition, you are indefinitely topic banned from editing articles (including drafts) about living and recently deceased people and from making statements about such people in other articles, broadly construed? You can appeal the topic ban at any time at WP:AN, preferably after having contributed to different areas of the encyclopedia for at least one year. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cheesy McGee,

do you agree, as a binding unblock condition, to an indefinite topic ban from editing articles (including drafts) about living and recently deceased people and from making statements about such people in other articles, broadly construed. You can appeal the topic ban at any time at WP:AN, preferably after having contributed to different areas of the encyclopedia for at least one year.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ToBeFree, Yes, I agree to those terms. Thanks, Cheesy McGee (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman, Yamla, and Rosguill: It's been a while and the possible damage is limited by a ban. Thoughts? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy with this per WP:ROPE. Giant Snowman 12:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No objections from me, either. --Yamla (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to all ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]