Wikipedia:Bold-refine: Revision history

13 April 2023

• curprev 23:1023:10, 13 April 2023‎ Liz talk contribs‎ m 7,181 bytes 0‎ Liz moved page User:Wikipedia:Bold-refine to Wikipedia:Bold-refine: Returning article to project space undo
• curprev 14:1514:15, 13 April 2023‎ Larataguera talk contribs‎ m 7,181 bytes 0‎ Larataguera moved page User:Jaredscribe/Bold-refine to User:Wikipedia:Bold-refine: Revert undiscussed move (WP:RMUM) undo
• curprev 14:1414:14, 13 April 2023‎ Larataguera talk contribs‎ 7,181 bytes −520‎ Make less snarky undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

12 April 2023

• curprev 17:4517:45, 12 April 2023‎ Dronebogus talk contribs‎ m 7,701 bytes 0‎ Dronebogus moved page Wikipedia:Bold-refine to User:Jaredscribe/Bold-refine: Astroturfing undo
• curprev 17:4417:44, 12 April 2023‎ Dronebogus talk contribs‎ 7,701 bytes −347‎ No edit summary undo

5 March 2023

• curprev 22:2422:24, 5 March 2023‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 8,048 bytes +129‎ refining ourselves as scholars and learners who read what each other writes. Every '''editor''' should be reader-student first: someone who enjoys learning, and '''researcher-writer''' second: someone who is willing to teaching what he or she knows. "Editing", and it accompanying "Discussion" is necessary, though subordinate undo
• curprev 22:1922:19, 5 March 2023‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,919 bytes +61‎ reformulate lede sentence for clarity and completeness: "The '''Bold-Refine''' process is the ideal collaborative writing cycle, which seeks {{slink|WP:Consensus#Through_editing}} in continuously improving multiple drafts, with informative edit summaries which are dialectical responses to challenges or errors pointed out by deletionists who revert." undo
• curprev 22:1522:15, 5 March 2023‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,858 bytes +148‎ final goal of '''Delivering''' a continuously improving WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA to the readers, while refining ourselves as scholars and learners. Every editor should be reader-student first: someone who enjoys learning. undo
• curprev 22:1122:11, 5 March 2023‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,710 bytes +108‎ Adding short description: "Essay on boldly editing with edit summary discussion that fixes problems and delivers", overriding automatically generated description undo Tag: Shortdesc helper

2 January 2023

• curprev 01:5001:50, 2 January 2023‎ Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs‎ 7,602 bytes +62‎ →‎See also: Add link to other dispute resolution options undo

26 October 2022

• curprev 15:4215:42, 26 October 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,540 bytes −48‎ slightly less derogatory undo
• curprev 15:4015:40, 26 October 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,588 bytes +66‎ WP:Consensus through WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM with WP:Discussion in edit summaries and multiple drafts instead of on talk pages undo

21 October 2022

• curprev 18:3218:32, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,522 bytes 0‎ →‎How to obvert: copy editing undo
• curprev 18:3218:32, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,522 bytes +1‎ →‎How to obvert: copy editing undo
• curprev 18:2418:24, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,521 bytes 0‎ →‎Possible editing processes: copy editing for consistent capitalization (my last edit in this section, which i forgot to notate as such, was partially to comply with MOS:ELLIPSIS) undo
• curprev 18:2018:20, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,521 bytes −30‎ copy editing - see MOS:EMDASH. also makes it consistent with the title. an en dash would arguably be better, but I'll leave it as a hyphen to be consistent with the title at least for now. undo
• curprev 18:1318:13, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,551 bytes +18‎ →‎Possible editing processes: copy editing undo
• curprev 18:0518:05, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ 7,533 bytes +345‎ →‎Possible editing processes: added explanation of terms. consider removing the parenthetical in "Rf" and also consider just not using these abbreviations. undo
• curprev 17:5817:58, 21 October 2022‎ Blippy1998 talk contribs‎ m 7,188 bytes +4‎ →‎Possible editing processes: this section is difficult to understand and inconsistent in formatting. 1st stage of copy editing done. undo

30 September 2022

• curprev 06:0306:03, 30 September 2022‎ Smjg talk contribs‎ m 7,184 bytes 0‎ caP undo

27 May 2022

• curprev 18:1118:11, 27 May 2022‎ Socksage talk contribs‎ m 7,184 bytes +10‎ c/e: repeat noun instead of using pronoun after long sentence undo

25 April 2022

• curprev 23:3123:31, 25 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:1c45:6147:c17e:a3ef talk‎ 7,174 bytes −103‎ Simplify a bit undo
• curprev 23:3123:31, 25 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:1c45:6147:c17e:a3ef talk‎ 7,277 bytes +4‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: Make a better section title undo
• curprev 23:2523:25, 25 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:1c45:6147:c17e:a3ef talk‎ 7,273 bytes +100‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: Obverting is not usually better, in most cases undo

21 April 2022

• curprev 03:0003:00, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,173 bytes +25‎ A writer who undo
• curprev 02:5302:53, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,148 bytes −1‎ →‎top: Writers who persist by obverting editorial reversions may use the edit summary field to meet their requirement of discussion, instead of or prior to "talking" on the talk page, and should accompny it with multiple drafts of wikitext itself, progressively refined in response to competent editorial input. undo
• curprev 02:3902:39, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,149 bytes +129‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: * BoTpRv (good but uncommon. This is Bold-Discuss-Revert, and the vandal fighters ought to be required to do this with newbies) undo
• curprev 02:3602:36, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 7,020 bytes +344‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: * BRvTp (not bad, but not good. This is how we often bite the newcomers (please don't), and sometimes get paralysed.) * BRvTp De (Good. This is WP:BRD, when it results in consensus and someone is able to deliver.) undo
• curprev 02:2202:22, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 6,676 bytes +317‎ →‎Dialectical Refinement: If during this process, you intend to remove substantive assertions that amount to a change in meaning, it is better to use a Partial reversion, so as to notify the original contributor. Retain the part of the contribution that is acceptable, while giving an adequate edit summary: State the what is being removed and why, in order to meet your requirement for discussion in the edit summary, undo
• curprev 00:3000:30, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 6,359 bytes +145‎ Clarifies a method of collaborative drafting that helps '''contributors''' and '''writers''' to craft good articles, while building consensus and trust through demonstration of competence, which cannot be assumed among the '''editors'''. Seeks consensus to replace WP:BRDR as a recommendation, and proposes a preventive strategy favoring Refinement and enables wp:Bold wp:obversion undo
• curprev 00:2000:20, 21 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 6,214 bytes +124‎ a continuously improving WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA to the readers, with WP:Consensus achieved through multiple drafts with edit summaries that are informative, and when necessary, dialectic undo

19 April 2022

• curprev 00:0600:06, 19 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,090 bytes −61‎ Fix obscurit undo
• curprev 00:0500:05, 19 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,151 bytes −1‎ →‎How to refine: Do the research: Parenthesis undo
• curprev 00:0500:05, 19 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,152 bytes +7‎ →‎Research, Analyze, Refine: Clean up section undo
• curprev 00:0200:02, 19 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,145 bytes +23‎ →‎State the Cause for Reversion: Clean up language undo
• curprev 00:0000:00, 19 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,122 bytes +15‎ →‎How to Obvert: Clean up obscure language undo

18 April 2022

• curprev 23:5123:51, 18 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,107 bytes 0‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: Uncapitalize undo
• curprev 23:5023:50, 18 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:5c55:6ab9:122b:7b34 talk‎ 6,107 bytes +16‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: Add BRD undo

17 April 2022

• curprev 22:5922:59, 17 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 6,091 bytes +87‎ →‎top: with a final goal of '''Delivering''' an WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA undo
• curprev 22:5022:50, 17 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 6,004 bytes +161‎ →‎How to Obvert: answer by GIVING AN ACCOUNT, even if the reverter has failed to do so. This demonstrates a GOOD FAITH effort to engage in a dialectic process. It will also help to educate the "editorial staff" on how to be more productive undo
• curprev 22:4322:43, 17 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,843 bytes +152‎ →‎How to Obvert: In response to a tendentious reversion, with NO CAUSE GIVEN, you may obvert to your bold contribution, and admonish the "editor" with WP:DRWNE. undo
• curprev 22:4022:40, 17 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,691 bytes +77‎ →‎State the Cause: WP:DRWNE: Don't revert with no explanation. undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 17 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,614 bytes +95‎ →‎State the Cause: rename section undo

7 April 2022

• curprev 18:1518:15, 7 April 2022‎ 2601:647:5800:1a1f:b45d:61ac:e323:660d talk‎ 5,519 bytes −16‎ Our readers aren't usually students undo

1 April 2022

• curprev 08:2708:27, 1 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,535 bytes +22‎ emphasis is on final goal of undo
• curprev 08:2608:26, 1 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,513 bytes +26‎ →‎top: WP:Bold undo
• curprev 08:1508:15, 1 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,487 bytes +47‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:1208:12, 1 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,440 bytes +18‎ →‎Research, Analyze, Refine: how you can PRESERVE the good and WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM undo
• curprev 07:1407:14, 1 April 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,422 bytes +273‎ proposes a preventive strategy favoring refinement and enabling wp:obversion to overcome the putrefying effect of a current policy that gives advantage to unjustified or wp:tendentious wp:reversions by incumbent editors who may be lazy, incompetent, biased, or distracted undo

31 March 2022

• curprev 17:2617:26, 31 March 2022‎ Jaredscribe talk contribs‎ 5,149 bytes +49‎ →‎Hypothetical Scenarios: * Bo De (presumed good) * Bo Tp (good but could be better) undo