Pepper (cryptography): Revision history

10 October 2023

• curprev 19:5819:58, 10 October 2023‎ JimTheFrog talk contribs‎ 8,593 bytes −24‎ Updated reference to newer NIST 800-63-4 and used NIST's new "secret key" terminology undo
• curprev 19:4519:45, 10 October 2023‎ JimTheFrog talk contribs‎ 8,617 bytes −9‎ Updated reference to newer NIST 800-63-4 and changed to NIST undo

19 August 2023

• curprev 00:4300:43, 19 August 2023‎ 2a01:e0a:b9:1010:789c:9ebd:5783:549a talk‎ 8,626 bytes +53‎ Add Cryptography hash navbox undo

16 February 2023

• curprev 07:4007:40, 16 February 2023‎ 80.208.64.184 talk‎ 8,573 bytes −439‎ Removing "Randomly selected pepper" undo Tags: section blanking Visual edit

29 November 2022

• curprev 11:4311:43, 29 November 2022‎ PhotographyEdits talk contribs‎ 9,012 bytes +116‎ Add template undo Tag: Visual edit

30 October 2022

• curprev 04:4404:44, 30 October 2022‎ Doctorkaufman talk contribs‎ 8,896 bytes 0‎ sentence case undo Tag: Visual edit

31 March 2022

• curprev 14:0714:07, 31 March 2022‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ 8,896 bytes +22‎ Look up poster's likely name, though post was actually posted with e-mail address. undo

30 March 2022

• curprev 21:5521:55, 30 March 2022‎ 85.238.101.69 talk‎ 8,874 bytes −24‎ WP:NOTYELLOW undo

4 November 2021

• curprev 16:5316:53, 4 November 2021‎ Amniarix talk contribs‎ 8,898 bytes +23‎ →‎History undo
• curprev 16:5116:51, 4 November 2021‎ Amniarix talk contribs‎ 8,875 bytes −11‎ →‎History undo
• curprev 16:3816:38, 4 November 2021‎ Amniarix talk contribs‎ 8,886 bytes −20‎ →‎History undo

15 September 2021

• curprev 13:2113:21, 15 September 2021‎ Jade.Vogt talk contribs‎ m 8,906 bytes +50‎ expanded first use of acronym and linked to the relevant article undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

7 September 2021

• curprev 18:3718:37, 7 September 2021‎ RFZYNSPY talk contribs‎ 8,856 bytes −1‎ Reverting edit(s) by 103.25.248.251 (talk) to rev. 1029090434 by GhostInTheMachine: Vandalism (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Undo
• curprev 18:3618:36, 7 September 2021‎ 103.25.248.251 talk‎ 8,857 bytes +1‎ (edit summary removed) undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 June 2021

• curprev 20:4320:43, 17 June 2021‎ GhostInTheMachine talk contribs‎ m 8,856 bytes −13‎ Reverted 1 edit by 176.241.95.250 (talk) to last revision by OhioanRCS undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 20:3320:33, 17 June 2021‎ 176.241.95.250 talk‎ 8,869 bytes +13‎ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100055813208007 undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21 February 2021

• curprev 07:5207:52, 21 February 2021‎ OhioanRCS talk contribs‎ 8,856 bytes +97‎ Undid revision 1008044075 by 117.20.117.47 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 07:5107:51, 21 February 2021‎ 117.20.117.47 talk‎ 8,759 bytes −97‎ →‎Types: 12345678 undo Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 February 2021

• curprev 21:5021:50, 12 February 2021‎ Kaltenmeyer talk contribs‎ m 8,856 bytes +13‎ clean up, replaced: anology → analogy undo Tag: AWB

17 December 2020

• curprev 15:1915:19, 17 December 2020‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ 8,843 bytes −34‎ Remove warning, as there are a lot more references now. undo

10 December 2020

• curprev 20:3520:35, 10 December 2020‎ 174.44.116.219 talk‎ 8,877 bytes +1‎ →‎History undo

23 November 2020

• curprev 21:0221:02, 23 November 2020‎ Skalman talk contribs‎ m 8,876 bytes −5‎ fix typos undo Tag: Visual edit

18 November 2020

• curprev 03:2703:27, 18 November 2020‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 8,881 bytes −9‎ Alter: url, pages. URLs might have been internationalized/anonymized. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | All pages linked from cached copy of User:Abductive/sandbox | via #UCB_webform_linked 339/500 undo

12 November 2020

• curprev 15:3415:34, 12 November 2020‎ Jellysandwich0 talk contribs‎ m 8,890 bytes 0‎ spelling undo
• curprev 09:3309:33, 12 November 2020‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ m 8,890 bytes +40‎ Link to Challenge–response authentication undo

11 November 2020

• curprev 21:4621:46, 11 November 2020‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ m 8,850 bytes −2‎ Put pepper in italics here, to better match other terms discussed in paragraph. undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 11 November 2020‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ 8,852 bytes +1,637‎ Add second bit of history, to bring us up to current usage. undo Tag: citing a blog or free web host
• curprev 20:2920:29, 11 November 2020‎ Dwmalone talk contribs‎ 7,215 bytes +1,964‎ Add the beginning of a history section, with history of idea and other uses of pepper. History of current usage to come. undo

4 November 2020

• curprev 09:2809:28, 4 November 2020‎ FozzieHey talk contribs‎ 5,251 bytes +165‎ Reorder & cite, still a lot of citations needed. I can't find anything for a "unique pepper per user" undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 09:1709:17, 4 November 2020‎ FozzieHey talk contribs‎ 5,086 bytes +24‎ Still needs a lot of refs. undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

3 November 2020

• curprev 12:2112:21, 3 November 2020‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 5,062 bytes 0‎ v2.03b - Bot T19 CW#83 - WP:WCW project (Heading start with three "=" and later with level two) undo Tag: WPCleaner

31 October 2020

• curprev 23:0723:07, 31 October 2020‎ RoyalTonberry talk contribs‎ 5,062 bytes +434‎ further cleanup undo

30 October 2020

• curprev 23:4723:47, 30 October 2020‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 4,628 bytes +18‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation Needed}} undo
• curprev 21:4721:47, 30 October 2020‎ RoyalTonberry talk contribs‎ 4,610 bytes +1,727‎ cleaning up this article after reading the cited sources undo

22 September 2020

• curprev 17:4217:42, 22 September 2020‎ Fancsali talk contribs‎ 2,883 bytes +26‎ →‎See also undo

21 September 2020

• curprev 17:0817:08, 21 September 2020‎ Joefromrandb talk contribs‎ 2,857 bytes −26‎ →‎See also: already linked in the article undo

31 August 2020

• curprev 11:2911:29, 31 August 2020‎ GhostInTheMachine talk contribs‎ 2,883 bytes +68‎ Adding local short description: "Cryptographic secret, more secure than a salt", overriding Wikidata description "secret added to an input such as a password prior to being hashed with a cryptographic hash function and not stored alongside the hashed output (unlike a salt)" (Shortdesc helper) undo

31 May 2020

• curprev 21:2921:29, 31 May 2020‎ NotYourBase talk contribs‎ m 2,815 bytes +33‎ cite needed undo Tag: Visual edit

23 March 2020

• curprev 19:4419:44, 23 March 2020‎ Ruakh talk contribs‎ 2,782 bytes +11‎ →‎See also: HMAC -- a related concept, though HMACs take it further (they resist more attacks) undo

29 February 2020

• curprev 15:1015:10, 29 February 2020‎ Dchestnykh talk contribs‎ 2,771 bytes −1,186‎ →‎Example usage: Removed section — the example is OC and is dangerous (e.g. when used with bcrypt, which has 72-byte password input) undo

12 February 2020

• curprev 16:5716:57, 12 February 2020‎ Rchard2scout talk contribs‎ m 3,957 bytes +36‎ Replace obsolete <tt> with <code>. You can help! undo

20 January 2020

• curprev 08:2108:21, 20 January 2020‎ 2001:818:dd12:2f00:246c:ee4c:cff2:8bb5 talk‎ 3,921 bytes −2‎ SHA256 isn't suitable for password hashing undo Tag: Visual edit

31 December 2019

• curprev 15:0215:02, 31 December 2019‎ CLCStudent talk contribs‎ m 3,923 bytes 0‎ Reverted edits by 140.213.59.213 (talk) to last version by 93.132.34.228 undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 14:4114:41, 31 December 2019‎ 140.213.59.213 talk‎ 3,923 bytes 0‎ Welcome to feebhax😈 jgan lupa hack dengan baik undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 July 2019

• curprev 13:0813:08, 5 July 2019‎ 93.132.34.228 talk‎ 3,923 bytes +258‎ Undid revision 885106389 by 173.64.109.100. Unfortunately, the new text was incorrect: even with a very strong hashing algorithm, weak passwords can be cracked. As for the original text, it's not magic. See the Adobe case: they encrypted their passwords and not a single password has been cracked through technical means (we can use the password hints to guess some of them, but the encryption and its key remain unbroken). A strong encryption key is needed of course. I clarified that in the article undo Tag: Undo

26 February 2019

• curprev 00:2700:27, 26 February 2019‎ 173.64.109.100 talk‎ 3,665 bytes −28‎ Corrected error. Encryption is not magically immune to brute force attack methods. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 January 2019

• curprev 17:5717:57, 17 January 2019‎ 92.24.213.205 talk‎ 3,693 bytes +1‎ →‎Example usage undo

18 November 2018

• curprev 21:2021:20, 18 November 2018‎ BenKuykendall talk contribs‎ 3,692 bytes −1,379‎ Removed stack exchange sources. Stack exchange answers, even if purportedly written by experts in the field, are never reliable sources. undo

13 October 2018

• curprev 12:5612:56, 13 October 2018‎ LucGommans talk contribs‎ 5,071 bytes +2,389‎ The citation cited another paper from 1996, where a pepper is indeed a tossed value, but this definition is very outdated. In 1996, password hashing was barely a thing. Password storage is a fast-moving field when compared to cryptography in general and practices change every five to ten years. Password storage functions ("slow hashes") are now common and achieve the same goal more efficiently than tossed secrets. These days, in the context of hashing, pepper is unambiguously a secret input. undo

7 June 2018

• curprev 16:4716:47, 7 June 2018‎ 105.229.82.34 talk‎ 2,682 bytes 0‎ →‎Example usage undo