BDC Aero Industrie: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, β†’ = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

12 July 2020

7 July 2020

4 July 2020

  • curprev 13:4813:48, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,608 bytes βˆ’1,695β€Ž WP:Consensus doesn't apply because there was no discussion or attempt to "incorporate everyone's concerns. All you did was edit war and attack me. So, WP:Consensus isn't relevant. I'll add back the links myself if there's a better reason to do it then just that you don't like them not being there though. Feel free to justify it in response to my message on your talk page. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 13:2213:22, 4 July 2020β€Ž Kyteto talk contribsβ€Ž 5,303 bytes +1,695β€Ž Undid revision 965952808 by Adamant1 (talk) Multiple users are stating that it is better for the article to be judged for deletion on its own merits, rather than after over half the cites have been deleted - the continuous reverts not only run against WP:BRD but WP:Consensus as well undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 12:1412:14, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,608 bytes βˆ’1,695β€Ž I specifically mentioned the sources in my AfD and people are allowed to edit articles while one is going on. So I'm not sure what's bad faith about that. Instead of calling people out over crap and reverting things that follow the rules, find better sources. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 12:1112:11, 4 July 2020β€Ž Ahunt talk contribsβ€Ž 5,303 bytes +1,695β€Ž β†’β€ŽProducts: restored deleted information, If you want to nom it for AfD, then fine, but don't delete sourced information first to make it look less notable and it makes it looks like a bad-faith nom. undo
  • curprev 10:4710:47, 4 July 2020β€Ž Kyteto talk contribsβ€Ž 3,608 bytes +38β€Ž Undid revision 965943435 by Adamant1 (talk) fixing a single missing character (that had been deleted by one of your own earlier edits) by deleting two citations is not a good way to fix glitching code - be more careful not to delete only part of a citation in future please undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 10:4110:41, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,570 bytes βˆ’37β€Ž Fixed ref error undo
  • curprev 10:4110:41, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,607 bytes βˆ’346β€Ž Your revert screwed up something with the references for some reason and I don't see you fixing it. That aside, Notability companies says trivial coverage includes of a product or a product line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance. If you don't like it, take it up with them. "But, but, but, other articles" is a weak argument anyway. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 10:3610:36, 4 July 2020β€Ž Kyteto talk contribsβ€Ž 3,953 bytes +346β€Ž Undid revision 965942428 by Adamant1 (talk) revert per WP:BRD - it is commonplace for aircraft company articles to mention In-development products. I'd point to examples as Sikorsky Aircraft for a whole table being used, or Boeing Phantom Works largely being design studies & projects undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 10:3510:35, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,607 bytes +419β€Ž Added {{subst:afd1}} undo
  • curprev 10:3310:33, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 3,188 bytes βˆ’1,346β€Ž Removed trivial run of the mill information about it having a planes registered with the FAA. As it applies to every plane manufacturer and Wikipedia isn't news. undo
  • curprev 10:3110:31, 4 July 2020β€Ž Adamant1 talk contribsβ€Ž 4,534 bytes βˆ’346β€Ž Removed mention of in development product. As Wikipedia isn't a news site and it's trivial until it's actually made. undo

25 June 2020

28 September 2019

22 February 2018

5 November 2017

23 October 2016

4 November 2015

3 November 2015

2 November 2015

3 October 2015

30 September 2015

29 September 2015

28 September 2015

25 September 2015

24 September 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)