Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DoggoBot 7: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add
→‎DoggoBot 7: specify non-GenFixes replacements
Line 32: Line 32:
* Changes {{tl|Primary sources}} to {{tl|BLP primary sources}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|Primary sources}} to {{tl|BLP primary sources}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|Self-published}} to {{tl|BLP self-published}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|Self-published}} to {{tl|BLP self-published}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|No footnotes}} to {{tl|BLP no footnotes}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|No footnotes}} to {{tl|BLP no footnotes}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]]. (not in GenFixes)
* Changes {{tl|One source}} to {{tl|BLP one source}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]].
* Changes {{tl|One source}} to {{tl|BLP one source}} if article has [[:Category:Living people]]. (not in GenFixes)
This would make the issue templates more specific, allowing for a range of benefits, such as prioritization for volunteers of which articles to work on (BLPs). General fixes will be enabled; most of the replacements above are through GenFixes. Pinging {{u|GoingBatty}}, who originally had this listed as an idea on [[User:BattyBot]] {{smiley}}
This would make the issue templates more specific, allowing for a range of benefits, such as prioritization for volunteers of which articles to work on (BLPs). General fixes will be enabled; most of the replacements above are through GenFixes. Pinging {{u|GoingBatty}}, who originally had this listed as an idea on [[User:BattyBot]] {{smiley}}



Revision as of 15:24, 18 May 2022

Operator: EpicPupper (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 22:49, Sunday, April 3, 2022 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: WP:AWB

Function overview: Make issue templates more specific

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: 15,271 on first run for {{refimprove}}, 919 for {{primary sources}}

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Using AWB, the bot would do the following:

This would make the issue templates more specific, allowing for a range of benefits, such as prioritization for volunteers of which articles to work on (BLPs). General fixes will be enabled; most of the replacements above are through GenFixes. Pinging GoingBatty, who originally had this listed as an idea on User:BattyBot

Discussion

  • Fine in theory, but it makes me wonder why these templates aren't merged in the underlying code, with the output changing based on whether the BLP cat is present. It would make the template slightly easier to use, automatically changes when a living person deceases, and (during the initial merge run) helps a bit in ensuring BLPs are tagged with the BLP cat. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Also see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/OmniBot 2 ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    TFD opened, I'll see how it goes 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 23:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    TfD closed. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The TFD, for the record, was here. Primefac (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]