User talk:GeneralNotability: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎FYI: new section
Line 294: Line 294:
:{{u|Beyond My Ken}}, replied at the SPI and on the editor in question's talk page, and if they don't give a satisfactory answer there will be indefs. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability#top|talk]]) 02:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Beyond My Ken}}, replied at the SPI and on the editor in question's talk page, and if they don't give a satisfactory answer there will be indefs. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability#top|talk]]) 02:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 02:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 02:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

== FYI ==

Quick courtesy note because the filer didn't notify you: You are being [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Banned_for_a_week_due_to_a_baseless_accusation_that_was_unjustifiable|discussed]] at AN. [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 10:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:35, 17 December 2020


Sockpuppet

Regarding Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elliotthomaspotts/Archive, they have another IP, which has vandalised past final warning too. 2.31.78.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)DarkGlow () 21:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DarkGlow, I think you're right, and that IP is on the same range as one I blocked before. Blocked them and another IP they seemed to be using. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Do you think it would be relevant to perhaps add this to WP:LTA? – DarkGlow () 20:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DarkGlow, don't think so - a few block evasions isn't enough to earn a place there in my opinion. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another of their IPs here: 2.24.14.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)DarkGlow () 13:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DarkGlow, blocked, thanks. Wish I could rangeblock but this is a huge range and there would be a lot of collateral damage. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's a shame. I don't know much about IPs – how many users would be affected by a rangeblock? – DarkGlow () 15:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DarkGlow, the network they're editing from contains 65,536 IPs and they could potentially be assigned any of those, plus they've previously been on a different network with the same number of IPs. I can't tell you how many people are actually on that range, but for ranges that big we usually won't block unless we're dealing with a really bad vandal or LTA. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another of their IPs: 2.24.14.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)DarkGlow () 18:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, GeneralNotability. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
HurricaneTracker495, handled. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

Gary Ridgway

Hi, and thanks for your help on Gary Ridgway. However, I noticed that the protection you put in place is significantly shorter than the previous protection, which expired only a couple days ago. Would you please take a look at the page's protection history and consider making the semi-protection longer? The page has been a vandalism target for a long time. Thanks. Dunley (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Second that request. The IPs belong to LTA CalebHughes and he'll just keep going for lack of something else to do with his life. Favonian (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dunley, Favonian, done - wasn't aware this was an LTA so I was just trying to stop the immediate damage. Protected for three months. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralNotability The three month protection you put in is still significantly shorter than the one year protection that expired only a couple days ago. Are you absolutely sure you don't want to go longer? Dunley (talk) 19:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Facepalm Facepalm I saw El C's block and was like "why did they do a <1 day block from Dec 2 to later on Dec 2?" Nope, that was a year block. Reading is hard, okay? Amended. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pro-tip: SOP, Dunley's also blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarquinhosWikipediano

It looks like they are using a proxy to editing the page .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano/Archive#21_November_2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soviet_war_crimes&diff=989942043&oldid=989936206 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soviet_war_crimes&diff=992662261&oldid=992277578 looks like the page needs protection.2601:81:C400:DC30:C0BF:DCE:5AAE:ECC6 (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are adding the same material that was deleted by another admin that they put https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soviet_war_crimes&diff=990060344&oldid=989995557 and they admit to being MarquinhosWikipediano just like they did on the ip talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soviet_war_crimes&diff=991022492&oldid=990892804 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:187.39.129.78#block.2601:81:C400:DC30:C0BF:DCE:5AAE:ECC6 (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, looks like them. I've blocked. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for giving me a second chance. I know a lot of admins that wouldn't have done that, and I am very grateful that you gave me one. I will stick to my promises and never sock again. Thanks again. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 17:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

About that film we discussed on IRC

After further investigating, I have come to the conclusion that the text may actually be a copyright violation. I copied and pasted the text into Google, and searches from 2010 came up. Dutchy85 did not add the text until 2012. I am well aware that these search results do not necessarily mean that the text was copied, but I do think it can be a good indicator. Sorry if I'm wasting your time. Again, the film is The Duel at Silver Creek. Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scorpions13256, if you do think it's a copyvio, go ahead and use the {{copyvio-revdel}} template (User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel is a great tool for generating the template). I just wanted to make sure that you'd considered the possibility that it was a reverse copyvio since the source looked a little iffy. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for recommending that script. I did not know it existed. I guess I no longer have to use IRC. I'll wait for someone to delete the revision. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trueman31

Hello. I recently saw a investigation of sock puppetry regards to that specific user. And I was put under suspicion. I am telling you and I felt like that I Just need to say I am 100% not trueman31. I would never vandalise the Wikipedia ever. Especially not after the last times. The edits I reverted was the ones that Trueman31 vandalised. I know that case closed but I’m just letting you know I’m not trueman31 or any sock puppet of him. Thanks WikiFlame50 (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello GeneralNotability,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Regarding a page

Hi, is it possible to delete this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MRRaja001 - MRRaja001 (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: Please give reply. - MRRaja001 (talk) 07:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forum shopping

See this, which itself links to my talk page and another deletion forum. Not sure what this editor is up to, keeps being told it's irredeemable spam Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak, thanks, I'll keep an eye on this...for someone with 100k+ edits they seem distressingly unfamiliar with some basic policies. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI follow-up: KevinPR82

This is follow up to SPI case you closed. I would have taken this to User:Ad Orientem, but that editor retired. Because there were other issues (what to do with standing cases when an admin retires, plus long-term edit warring, disruptive unsourced editing, and WP:IDHT), I tried ANI, but failed to get a coherent response. The SPI subject did respond promptly with an unsigned post from another IP in the SPI case. Despite a clear warning to avoid mixing static IP and account edits which was received a half-hearted response, there was an ongoing mix with IP and logged-in edits over the following months: account and IP. Not all, but many of the logged-in edits were on partially protected pages. My threshold for action was reached with the account repeating the same factually incorrect (basic arithmatic) edit: IP (October)-account (December) that had been reverted by another editor. The IP that replied on ANI, had not made other edits between the SPI and the ANI, but has only made one unsourced edit that has been reverted at Chain letter. It follows the same theme as prior unsourced edits from a defunct IP ([5], [6]) from the SPI case. That IP had been reported for sockpuppetry and there was an unsigned IP reply that argued against the need for sources since some unsourced edits had not been reverted. I hope I am not out of line coming to you. If I am, please refer me to the appropriate venue. BiologicalMe (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BiologicalMe, acknowledging that I've seen this, but it's been a busy couple of days. I'll try to take care of this tomorrow. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. This is a case measured in edits per week, so there is no rush. Thank you for for the status update. BiologicalMe (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protection on Rufus

The page on Rufus (software) is semiprotected due to vandalism, despite having a low amount of edits, vandalism or not. I personally think that pending changes would be a better form of protection for the remainder of the current protection. Computerfan0 (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Computerfan0, sure, why not. Dropped to PC protection. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Could you take a look at...

this, in your capacity as an SPI clerk? My concern is that the reported sock is editing articles which the master has been topic banned from. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond My Ken, replied at the SPI and on the editor in question's talk page, and if they don't give a satisfactory answer there will be indefs. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Quick courtesy note because the filer didn't notify you: You are being discussed at AN. Blablubbs|talk 10:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]