User talk:Joshua Jonathan: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:42, 26 January 2020

en:User:Joshua Jonathan/Buddha/message

untitled

sigh. sigh. SIGH. Puduḫepa 17:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. WP:COMPETENCE. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	Thanks!
	For your work on this page. Puduḫepa 00:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kushan Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Huns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Personal comments"

Hi Joshua Jonathan! In case you want to collapse the latest overflow of wisdom by that SPA as "Personal comments", feel free to collapse my answers to that individual as well (my dumb, violation of WP:DFTT LOL). –Austronesier (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your anti-Iranian attitude

Misplaced accusations; and don't use my talkpage for this exposition of WP:DONTGETIT.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You are attacking me eveywhere just because I mention recent peer reviewed academic sources about Indo-European origin in Iran, please stop this offensive behavior. I hope it doesn't relate to racism. MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Have you ever considered, MojtabaShahmiri, that the problem might be your overly pro-Iranian attitude? How does it compute that someone pointing out you are using WP:OR to argue that Indo-Europeans all come from ancient Iran (the population of which has no doubt changed substantially since 2000 BC) is motivated by racism?--Ermenrich (talk) 19:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you read in my User page, I am an academic historian from Iran, specialist in the history of western Iran from the 3rd to 1st millennium BC. And as you read in this talk page: Talk:Mycenaean_Greece I myself believe Iranian culture in the northwest of Iran dates back to about the 8th century BC and in 2,000 BC the ancestors of Iranians were probably somewhere in the Central Asia. In fact I also believe those who lived in Iran in 2,000 BC were different people. According to you link, the phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Are David Reich's works and the Journal of Indo-European Studies NOT reliable published sources?! The problem seems to be just about European or Middle Eastern origin of Indo-Europeans and it can be certainly related to racism. --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your article creation. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Krakkos submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Joshua Jonathan to be Editor of the Week for his outstanding contributions to Wikipedia. Throughout more than eight years of service, Joshua Jonathan has made more than 70,000 edits to the project and created a large number of quality articles.[1][2] He has significantly contributed towards improving Wikipedia's coverage of the history and cultures of southern, eastern and central Asia, particularly the important subjects Buddhism and Hinduism. He has played a decisive role in ensuring that Wikipedia is kept up to date with the newest developments in the research of the archaeological history of Eurasia, and in the protection of our articles on this controversial subject from being tainted with fringe theories. Joshua Jonathan is truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia and a worthy candidate for the Editor of the Week award.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 15:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
 |-
-|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
+|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your article creation. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
 |}
-[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
+[[User:Krakkos]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
+:I nominate Joshua Jonathan to be Editor of the Week for his outstanding contributions to Wikipedia. Throughout more than eight years of service, Joshua Jonathan has made more than 70,000 edits to the project and created a large number of quality articles.[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/adminscore/en.wikipedia.org/Joshua%20Jonathan][https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/Joshua%20Jonathan] He has significantly contributed towards improving Wikipedia's coverage of the history and cultures of southern, eastern and central [[Asia]], particularly the important subjects [[Buddhism]] and [[Hinduism]]. He has played a decisive role in ensuring that Wikipedia is kept up to date with the newest developments in the research of the archaeological history of [[Eurasia]], and in the protection of our articles on this controversial subject from being tainted with [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theories]]. Joshua Jonathan is truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia and a worthy candidate for the Editor of the Week award.
-:{{{nominationtext}}}
 You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
 <pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>