User talk:Epicgenius: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Industry City: Template for Editor of the Week/Recipient notification
→‎Editor of the Week: Awarded w/ ping
Line 163: Line 163:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
|}
[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
[[ping|User:Dmartin969]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:I nominate epicgenius to be Editor of the Week for tirelessly contributing to articles, especially regarding [[New York City]] and related topics, creating new countless number of redirects (for which he has earned a barnstar), among thousands of other edits, all of which led to him becoming a member of the ''prestigious'' Category:Wikipedians who spend way too much time editing Wikipedia.
:{{{nominationtext}}}
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>
Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213;[[User:Buster7|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Buster7'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Buster7|<span style="color:#AAA;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213;[[User:Buster7|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Buster7'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Buster7|<span style="color:#AAA;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:45, 8 December 2018








Click here to scroll to the bottom of the page.


Washington, DC neighborhoods

There was an extended discussion about this a while back at Talk:Georgetown_(Washington,_D.C.)#Proposed_move, resulting in no consensus - I don't remember the details at the moment, but before you continue with your en masse edits, can you take a quick look at it? I'll do likewise. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnInDC: Sure, I'll take a look. Thanks for alerting me to this. epicgenius (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnInDC: Just had a quick skim. It looks like there were different opinions. Some were for the comma (mostly for the sake of consistency) and others were for parentheses (because Washington, D.C. isn't really a "natural disambiguator" and possibly, I assume, because it has a comma already). Maybe I should create a new RM discussion to deal with the consistency issue. No opinion either way on comma or parenthetical disambiguation, but I just think there should be a consistent naming convention. epicgenius (talk) 00:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There were indeed a variety of views, and I know I came down on the parenthetical side. I'm going through it all a bit more carefully to see how I feel about it today. I do agree re consistency within DC neighborhoods, if nothing else. Thanks for thinking about this, and if you open up a new discussion, let me know! JohnInDC (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnInDC: No problem. I'll probably make a new discussion in a few days, probably at the Georgetown article so people could also see the last move discussion. And I'll definitely let you know. epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnInDC: I haven't forgotten about this, but I've been a bit busy for the past week. I will make an RM discussion soon. epicgenius (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping thread for 30 days. epicgenius (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #1

Welcome to the first newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth Team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects. We will be starting with Wikipedias, but we hope these changes will benefit every community.

8 ideas we consider: tell us what you think about them!

We are considering new features to build, that could retain new editors in mid-size Wikipedias. We will be testing new ideas in Czech and Korean Wikipedias, and then we'll talk to more communities (yours!) about adopting the ideas that work well.

We have posted the 8 ideas we are considering. We would really appreciate your thoughts and the thoughts from your community. Please share the ideas, and tell us what do you and your community think of those ideas before September 9.

Share your experiences with newcomers

We want to hear about what is working and what is not working for new contributors in your wiki. We also want to hear any reactions, questions, or opinions on our work. Please post on the team’s talk page, in any language!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project page for detailed updates on the first project we'll work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by botGive feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

23rd Street reopening in question

Under planned service changes, the date was reverted to December, so I don't know how we should deal with this.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I actually just passed by the station and it was closed. I think we should revert the edits until the opening is confirmed. epicgenius (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the edits. The walls were down, and the screens, glass fare control, and platform edges were all installed. But for some reason there was a "Exit" sign leaning against the wall. From the looks of it, it seems like they might be ready next week or something. There aren't any pictures, unfortunately, or I would've posted it on NYC Transit Forums, even though I don't really post that often. epicgenius (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Penn Station Numbers

The article stated that 630,000 passengers use Penn Station.

And we already know the following: LIRR - 233,340 NJT - 93,305 Amtrak - 28,487 Subway - 200,000 = 555,132

Since 630,000 passengers use Penn station, 630,000-555,132 = gives us about 75,000 passengers who arrive and depart Penn station not using any of the above means. Which means they arrive by the only remaining way which are Buses. Mercenary2k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mercenary2k: I see, thanks. However, I think ride share and taxis are also included in this total. In any case, I think we should only include the LIRR, NJ Transit, and Amtrak ridership because the subway stations are not actually part of Penn Station, but rather, are connected to it. We can include the subway ridership as a note, but they aren't part of the railroad component of Penn Station (i.e. they don't use the 11 platforms and 21 tracks for commuter/intercity rail, and they each have their own fare collection areas). epicgenius (talk) 14:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #4

Welcome to the fourth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

We need your feedback!

We have two requests for community members:

  1. Now that data is coming in for the welcome survey, we are planning how to use that data to personalize the newcomer's first day. See our current thoughts here, and join the conversation here.
  2. Try out the help panel's interactive prototype, and read about how we're planning to roll it out, and post any thoughts or reactions here.

Two Growth team projects have been deployed (detailed updates here)

  • Personalized first day (welcome survey) was deployed on November 20 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
    • The survey is now being shown to half of new users (A/B test). Responses are being recorded in the database. We'll report on initial results during December.
    • We are planning to test a second version of the survey, called "Variation C", which we think will maximize the number of users who complete the survey and stay on the wiki.
    • The original objective of this project was to give newcomers the materials they need to achieve their goals, and so now we are currently planning how we will use the information collected in the welcome survey to personalize the newcomer's experience. We hope community members will read our current thinking and join the conversation here. Some of the plans we are considering include:
      • Making it easy for newcomers to see editing activity around the topic areas in which they indicated that they're interested.
      • Connecting interested newcomers to experienced editors.
      • Surfacing the help content most relevant to the reason for which the newcomers created their accounts.
  • Understanding first day (EditorJourney) was deployed on November 15 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias. It has been done after a longer security review and final testing than expected. Data is now being recorded for all new users on those wikis, and we've been auditing the data and preparing to make initial reports during December. Stay tuned for the next newsletter!

Help panel is under construction

  • Focus on help desk (help panel) is planned to be deployed during the week of January 7 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
  • This interactive prototype is the best way to see the design and wording in the feature.
  • We ran live user tests on the prototype, with results posted here.
  • In addition to giving the ability to ask a question, the help panel will also contain a set of links to existing help content. Our ambassadors on Czech and Korean Wikipedias are determining the right initial set of most helpful links in this task.
  • We encourage community members to try out the prototype and read about the rules for who will get the feature, and add any thoughts to this discussion.

We are still looking for volunteers

Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.

Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project updates page for detailed updates on the projects we work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 09:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Grand Central

Hey, also, I'm going to Grand Central on January 7th to take a massive amount of photos; you're welcome to join too if you'll be nearby. I received a permit from the terminal and everything. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 15:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@: Great! I'll check my calendar to see if I will be free on that date. My workplace is located near Grand Central so I can probably drop by. I'm also planning to take some pictures next week, as my school (Baruch College) is also located near Grand Central. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I didn't know you needed a permit to take photos. That's interesting... epicgenius (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Only for if you're using a tripod and other equipment like that. Can I PM you somehow with more details about the shoot? ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 16:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, feel free to email me. Or message me if you're on the Wikipedia Discord channel. epicgenius (talk) 16:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @: Hey, just saw this. Is there some central city office to contact for this kind of permit, or does it require tracking down the operations staff (or whoever) for each location? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure; I was just browsing the terminal's website and found this form. Best, ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 17:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Industry City

Saw you nominated it for GA. Just FYI if there's a particular picture you want for the article, I'm there on a semi-regular basis. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Thanks for the offer. I went there on Tuesday, and now that I think of it, there are some things that still need to be photographed or require better photos. I only got a grainy exterior shot of the newly opened Japan Village on Third Avenue between 35th and 36th, and I didn't get any interior shots at all. By the way, there are some warehouses between 1st and 2nd Avenue south of 39th Street that I didn't get to. (These are technically part of NYCEDC's Bush Terminal though, and not Industry City, so it's fine if you don't want to photograph that.) Anyway, just some photo suggestions which are by no means necessary. epicgenius (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Dmartin969 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate epicgenius to be Editor of the Week for tirelessly contributing to articles, especially regarding New York City and related topics, creating new countless number of redirects (for which he has earned a barnstar), among thousands of other edits, all of which led to him becoming a member of the prestigious Category:Wikipedians who spend way too much time editing Wikipedia.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7  20:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]