User talk:JuanRiley: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:51, 28 January 2016

This user is relatively new and does not edit a whole lot.
This user originally intended to edit articles on various technical subject areas; however, until that seems less like work that is still a goal only.
This user does not archive (he deletes) because: (a) he can't be bothered learning how to do so and (b) seriously, like anything on this page is important enough to do so. So if you want, try 'history'.
This user does not like comments/discussion on his page that are appropriate to an article's talk page. REALLY!
This user does, however, appreciate appropriate, friendly, and/or amusing asides concerning ongoing article talk page discussions.
On unfriendly comments:
- warnings or (OMG) block notices by admins will usually be left here for a decorous period of time before being deleted;
- warnings by self appointed keepers of the truth will be deep sixed quite rapidly.
  - some admins (and god help us now arbcomms) are such self appointed keepers of the truth so I might just delete them too.

References

This post is left because I find it occasionally helpful and as an example of what rarely happens: a helpful post from an editor.

Thank you for your interest in references :). You can find an example of a number of different techniques at the article Ketamine where I have just reworked them. When using shortened footnotes inside ref tags I use {{harvnb|...|...}} because {{sfn|...|...}} won't work. Blah... If you have questions or want help on refs anytime, post to my talk page. Yours in detail oriented reference formatting. - - MrBill3 (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A question

I would just like to ask: do you have any alternative clean-start or hidden accounts? Esquivalience ^t 02:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Witch hunt? Juan Riley (talk) 02:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps; ArbCom and venues of drama are not for relative newbies nor do I expect newer editors to touch such areas. Esquivalience ^t 02:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What you @Esquivalience: expect is not my concern. Juan Riley (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ::Witch hunt? [[User:JuanRiley|Juan Riley ]] ([[User talk:JuanRiley#top|talk]]) 02:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 :::[[Quantum superposition|Perhaps]]; ArbCom and venues of drama are not for relative newbies nor do I expect newer editors to touch such areas. '''''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #33BBFF; font-family:Lato, monospace'">Esquivalience</span>]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 02:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
+::::What you {{ping|Esquivalience}} expect is not my concern. [[User:JuanRiley|Juan Riley ]] ([[User talk:JuanRiley#top|talk]]) 02:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)