Revision as of 02:52, 13 January 2016

Requests for arbitration

Arbitration Committee proceedings

recent changes
purge this page
view or discuss this template

Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Venezuelan politics	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	20 Apr 2024	04 May 2024

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Conflict of interest management	13 Apr 2024
Mzajac	7 May 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing	none	(orig. case)	30 April 2024
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4	none	(orig. case)	13 May 2024
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation	none	(orig. case)	13 May 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Shortcuts

WP:ARC
WP:A/R/C

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

This page is for statements, not discussion.

If you must reply to another user's statement, do so in your own section (more information).
Your section must not contain more than 500 words (Word Count Tool; internal gadget). This includes your replies to other users. To request an extension, either make the request in your statement section or email the clerks email list.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, eg off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
 {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}}
-{{subst:Arbitration case request
-|CASENAME  = I Dream Of Jeannie TV Series
-|admin     = yes or no <!--Are you an admin? NO
-|party2    = AussieLegend
- |P2 admin = NO
-|party3    = no other parties
- |P3 admin = NO
-IMPORTANT:
-The Special:ListUsers did not work for me so I can't determine if  AussieLegend  is an administrator.
-AussieLegend says: "There's no need to edit-war. It's as simple as that. Editors should always try to work with each other." Well I have not invoked an edit war willingly nor have I wontonly vandalized anyone's work. I may have screwed up something or pressed a wrong button, and I would be very sorry for that. However I believe AussieLegend just got angry judged my intent prematurely, especially considering his "zero tolerance policy" repeated 6 ways to Sunday on his page.
-The article in question appears to have reverted to what I saw before, with my two small additions in the "Factual Errors" section of "I Dream Of Jeannie", intact as I added the, The additions applied to geographical and historical facts behind the manned space program in the United States during the 1960s. I stand behind them. I do not approve off vandalism either, in any way, shape or form. I do encourage discussion, but I doubt this individual will discuss it,  apparently having their mind made up that I am a vandal. So much for " "There's no need to edit-war..."
-}}