Time perception: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Jwratner1 (talk | contribs)
1,437 edits
Line 4: Line 4:
}}
}}
[[File:Swatch Irony angle below.jpg|thumb|right|A contemporary [[quartz watch]]]]
[[File:Swatch Irony angle below.jpg|thumb|right|A contemporary [[quartz watch]]]]
'''Time perception''' is a field of study within [[psychology]] and [[neuroscience]] that refers to one's subjective experience of [[time]], which is measured by one's own awareness of the duration of the indefinite and continuous unfolding of events. The time perception of another person cannot be directly experienced and understood, but it can be objectively studied and understood through a number of scientific experiments.
'''Time perception''' is a field of study within [[psychology]] and [[neuroscience]] that refers to one's subjective experience of [[time]], which is measured by one's own perception of the duration of the indefinite and continuous unfolding of events. Another person's perception of time cannot be directly experienced or understood, but it can be objectively studied and understood through a number of scientific experiments. Time perception is a construction of the brain that can also be manipulated through a variety of experiments.


Pioneering work, emphasizing species-specific differences, was done by [[Karl Ernst von Baer]].{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}} Experimental work began under the influence of the psycho-physical notions of [[Gustav Theodor Fechner]] with studies of the relationship between perceived and measured time.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}}
Pioneering work, emphasizing species-specific differences, was done by [[Karl Ernst von Baer]].{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}} Experimental work began under the influence of the psycho-physical notions of [[Gustav Theodor Fechner]] with studies of the relationship between perceived and measured time.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}}
Line 16: Line 16:
== Associated brain regions ==
== Associated brain regions ==


Although one's perception of time is not associated with a specific sensory system, the work of [[psychologist]]s and [[neuroscientist]]s has suggested that human brains do have a system governing the [[perception]] of [[time]].<ref name=unisci /> It is composed of a highly distributed system involving the [[cerebral cortex]], [[cerebellum]] and [[basal ganglia]]. One particular component, the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus]], is responsible for the [[circadian rhythm|circadian (or daily) rhythm]], while other cell clusters appear to be capable of shorter-range ([[ultradian]]) timekeeping.
Although one's perception of time is not associated with a specific sensory system, [[psychologist]]s and [[neuroscientist]]s suggest that humans do have a system governing the [[perception]] of [[time]].<ref name=unisci /> It is composed of a highly distributed system involving the [[cerebral cortex]], [[cerebellum]] and [[basal ganglia]]. One particular component, the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus]], is responsible for the [[circadian rhythm|circadian (or daily) rhythm]], while other cell clusters appear to be capable of shorter-range ([[ultradian]]) timekeeping.


Different types of sensory information are processed at different speeds by different neural architectures.
⚫
It has been suggested that a human's visual cortex is more active when one attempts to estimate the duration of a visual stimulus. Similarly, the primary motor cortex is thought to be more active when a person tries to estimate the duration of time necessary to complete a certain action. Also, the auditory cortex is thought to be more active when a person attempts to estimate the duration of a given sound stimulus.


⚫
It has been suggested that the human brains' visual cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration of a visual stimulus. The primary motor cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration needed to complete a specific action. The auditory cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration of a given sound stimulus.--> and so on.
⚫
Experiments have shown that rats can successfully estimate intervals of time around 40 seconds despite having their [[Cerebral cortex|cortex]] entirely removed, which suggests that it may be a low level (subcortical) process.<ref name=mackintosh /><ref name=jaldow />

⚫
Experiments have shown that rats can successfully estimate a time interval of ~ 40 seconds, despite having their [[Cerebral cortex|cortex]] entirely removed. This suggests that time estimation may be a low level (subcortical) process.<ref name="mackintosh" /><ref name="jaldow" />


=== Specious present ===
=== Specious present ===
Line 28: Line 30:
== Types of temporal illusions ==
== Types of temporal illusions ==


A ''temporal illusion'' is a distortion in one's perception of time that occurs when the [[time]] interval between two or more events is very short (typically less than a second). In such cases, a person may momentarily perceive time as slowing down, stopping, speeding up, or running backwards. Additionally, a person may misperceive the temporal order of these events. People tend to recall recent events as occurring further back in time than they actually did (backward telescoping) and distant events as occurring more recently than they actually did (forward telescoping).<ref name=jcp />
A ''temporal illusion'' is a distortion in one's perception of time that occurs when the [[time]] interval between two or more events is very narrow (typically less than a second). In such cases, a person may momentarily perceive time as slowing down, stopping, speeding up, or running backwards. Additionally, a person may misperceive the temporal order of these events. People tend to recall recent events as occurring further back in time than they actually did (backward telescoping) and distant events as occurring more recently than they actually did (forward telescoping).<ref name=jcp />


=== Kappa effect ===
=== Kappa effect ===

Revision as of 09:56, 14 August 2013

A contemporary quartz watch

Time perception is a field of study within psychology and neuroscience that refers to one's subjective experience of time, which is measured by one's own perception of the duration of the indefinite and continuous unfolding of events. Another person's perception of time cannot be directly experienced or understood, but it can be objectively studied and understood through a number of scientific experiments. Time perception is a construction of the brain that can also be manipulated through a variety of experiments.

Pioneering work, emphasizing species-specific differences, was done by Karl Ernst von Baer.[citation needed] Experimental work began under the influence of the psycho-physical notions of Gustav Theodor Fechner with studies of the relationship between perceived and measured time.[citation needed]

Theories

William J. Friedman also contrasted two theories for a sense of time:[1]

  • The strength model of time memory. This posits a memory trace that persists over time, by which one might judge the age of a memory (and therefore how long ago the event remembered occurred) from the strength of the trace. This conflicts with the fact that memories of recent events may fade more quickly than more distant memories.
  • The inference model suggests the time of an event is inferred from information about relations between the event in question and other events whose date or time is known.

Associated brain regions

Although one's perception of time is not associated with a specific sensory system, psychologists and neuroscientists suggest that humans do have a system governing the perception of time.[2] It is composed of a highly distributed system involving the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and basal ganglia. One particular component, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, is responsible for the circadian (or daily) rhythm, while other cell clusters appear to be capable of shorter-range (ultradian) timekeeping.

Different types of sensory information are processed at different speeds by different neural architectures.

It has been suggested that the human brains' visual cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration of a visual stimulus. The primary motor cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration needed to complete a specific action. The auditory cortex is more active when an individual attempts to estimate the duration of a given sound stimulus.--> and so on.

Experiments have shown that rats can successfully estimate a time interval of ~ 40 seconds, despite having their cortex entirely removed. This suggests that time estimation may be a low level (subcortical) process.[3][4]

Specious present

Main article: Specious present

The specious present is the time duration wherein a state of consciousness is experienced as being in the present.[5] The term was first introduced by the philosopher E. R. Clay.[6][7] and further developed by William James.[7] James defined the specious present to be "the prototype of all conceived times... the short duration of which we are immediately and incessantly sensible". C. D. Broad in "Scientific Thought" (1930) further elaborated on the concept of the specious present, and considered that the Specious Present may be considered as the temporal equivalent of a sensory datum.[7] A version of the concept was used by Edmund Husserl in his works and discussed further by Francisco Varela based on the writings of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty.[8]

Types of temporal illusions

A temporal illusion is a distortion in one's perception of time that occurs when the time interval between two or more events is very narrow (typically less than a second). In such cases, a person may momentarily perceive time as slowing down, stopping, speeding up, or running backwards. Additionally, a person may misperceive the temporal order of these events. People tend to recall recent events as occurring further back in time than they actually did (backward telescoping) and distant events as occurring more recently than they actually did (forward telescoping).[9]

Kappa effect

The Kappa effect is a form of temporal illusion verifiable by experiment,[10] wherein a sequence of consecutive stimuli is thought to be relatively longer or shorter than its actual elapsed time, because of the minimal or extreme spacial/auditory/tactile separation between consecutive moments. The kappa effect can be displayed when considering a journey made in two parts that take an equal amount of time. Between these two parts, the journey that covers more distance will appear to take longer than the journey covering less distance, even though they take an equal amount of time.

Stopped clock illusion

The stopped clock illusion, also known as chronostasis, is when the seconds hand of a clock appears to freeze in place for a short period of time after a person initially looks at it.[11] Later it was found that saccadic eye movements could cause compression of time as well as space.[12] Terao, Watanabe, Yagi, & Nishida (2005) were able to show that reducing the visibility of a flash by means of dimming was sufficient in reducing time interval estimation.[13] Taken together these findings suggest that when vision is tainted in some way, as in the case of a saccade when vision is blurred or in the case of a dimmed flash when the flash is harder to identify, that time perception is also affected.

The oddball effect

Another temporal illusion, called the "oddball effect", occurs when a person perceives an unusual stimuli through the senses that appears to be a potential threat or mate. Research has suggested that time seems to slow down when a person skydives or bungee jumps,[14] or when a person suddenly and unexpectedly senses the presence of a potential predator or mate. This reported slowing in one's temporal perception may have been biologically selected for via natural selection, because it may have enhanced our ability to intelligibly make quick decisions in moments that were of critical importance to our survival. However, even though observers commonly report that time seems to have moved in slow motion during these events, it is unknown whether this is a function of increased time resolution during the event, or instead an illusion of remembering an emotionally salient event. Research conducted by David Eagleman has suggested that time does not actually run in slow motion for a person during a life-threatening event, but, rather, it is only a retrospective assessment that brings that person to such a conclusion. To bring this into the realm of scientific study, he measured time perception during free-fall by strapping palm-top computers to subjects' wrists and having them perform psychophysical experiments as they fall. By measuring their speed of information intake, they concluded that participants do not obtain increased temporal resolution during the fall, but, Instead, because memories are more densely packed during a frightening situation, the event seems to have taken longer only in retrospect.[15]

Effects of emotional states

The perception of another persons' emotions can also change our sense of time. The theory of embodied mind (or cognition), as caused by mirror neurons, helps explain how the perception of other people's emotions have the ability to change one's own sense of time. Embodied cognition hinges on an internal process that mimics or simulates another's emotional state, because it enables a person to tune in and understand another's feelings. For example, if person #1 spends time with person #2 who speaks and walks incredibly slow, person #1's internal clock may slow down.

Recent research, conducted by General Atlantic professor of marketing at the Stanford GSB and Kathleen Vohs at the University of Minnesota, has found that the feeling of awe has the ability to expand one's perceptions of time availability. Awe is an experience of perceptual vastness that increases one's focus in the present moment by inspiring a desire to interpret and form new knowledge structures. Consequently, it is conceivable that one's temporal perception would slow down when experiencing awe.[16]

Recent research by neuro-physiologists and chemists working on time processing is beginning to show how emotions may speed up or slow down our perception of time. In 2011 Professor Droit-Volet and Sandrine Gil, a lecturer on cognition and learning at Poitiers University, France, published a study of how changes in the emotional state of subjects caused by watching films affected their sense of time. The psychologists showed students extracts from films known to induce fear (horror movies such as The Blair Witch Project, Scream, The Shining) or sadness (drama such as City of Angels, Philadelphia or Dangerous Minds). A third category of "neutral" footage (weather forecasts or stock market updates) was also shown. They then asked students to estimate the duration of a visual stimulus and it was often an overestimate of the elapsed time. This state also involved dilated pupils, higher pulse rate, increased blood pressure and muscular contraction. Fear prompted a state of arousal in the amygdala, which speeded up the rate of the subjects' internal clocks. It reflects a defensive mechanism triggered by a threatening situation, in which one must quickly decide whether or not to attack or run away from a threat. The psychologists observed this similar tendency to overestimate time in three-year-old children exposed to a threat.

Changes with aging

Psychologists have found that a human's perception of the passing of time tends to speed up with increasing age, which causes older people to increasingly underestimate a given interval of time.[17] Very young children literally "live in time" before gaining an awareness of its passing. A child will first experience the passing of time when he or she can subjectively perceive and reflect on the unfolding of a collection of events. The awareness of time improves during childhood as children's attention and short-term memory capacities develop, a process dependent on the slow maturation of the prefrontal cortex. One day to an eleven-year-old would be approximately 1/4,000 of their life, while one day to a 55-year-old would be approximately 1/20,000 of their life. This helps to explain why a random day may appear longer for a young child than for an adult.[18]

The common explanation is that most external and internal experiences are new and novel for young children, while most experiences are repetitive for adults. Children have to be extremely engaged (i.e., dedicate many neural resources or much brain power) in the present moment, because they must constantly reconfigure their mental models of the world to assimilate it and properly behave within it. On the contrary, it is argued that adults fall into mental habits and external routines that they rarely step outside of. When an adult experiences this overstimulation of the same stimuli, the brain renders it "invisible", because the brain has already sufficiently and effectively mapped it- a phenomenon known as neural adaptation. As a consequence, an adult's perception of time speeds up because they will pay less attention and lay down less memory to the continuous unfolding of events.

In an experiment comparing a group of subjects aged between 19 and 24 and a group between 60 and 80 asked to estimate when they thought 3 minutes had passed, it was found that the younger group's estimate was on average 3 minutes and 3 seconds, while the older group averaged 3 minutes and 40 seconds, indicating a significant change in one's perception of time with age.[19]

Effects of psychoactive substances

Psychoactive drugs can alter one's judgement of time. Some – such as entheogens – may dramatically alter a person's temporal judgement. These include substances such as LSD, psilocybin, and mescaline. At higher doses time may appear to slow down, stop, speed up, go backwards or even seem out of sequence. In a 2007 study by Wittman et al., psilocybin was found to significantly impair one's ability to reproduce interval durations longer than 2.5 seconds, significantly impair synchronizing motor actions (taps on a computer keyboard) to regularly occurring tones, and impair one's ability to keep tempo when asked to tap on a key at a self paced but consistent interval.[20] In 1955, British MP Christopher Mayhew took mescaline hydrochloride in an experiment under the guidance of his friend, Dr Humphry Osmond. On the BBC documentary The Beyond Within, he described that half a dozen times during the experiment, he had "a period of time that didn't end for me".[citation needed]

Stimulants can lead both humans and rats to overestimate time intervals,[21][22] while depressants can have the opposite effect.[23] The level of activity in the brain of neurotransmitters such as dopamine and norepinephrine may be the reason for this.[24]

Effects of meditation

Researchers at the University of Kent in Canterbury, Kent, UK have increasingly focussed on the benefits of meditation in everyday life and performance. Mindfulness in particular improves attention, working memory capacity, and reading comprehension. Given its emphasis on moment-to-moment awareness, they noticed that mindfulness meditation would alter time perception. The Researchers had participants carry out a temporal bisection task, where several probe durations are compared to "short" and "long" standards. Following this, participants either listened to an audiobook or a meditation that focussed on the movement of breath in the body. Finally, participants completed the temporal bisection task for a second time. The control group obviously showed no change after the listening task. However, meditation led to a relative overestimation of durations.[25]

Effects of body temperature

Experimental results have suggested that body temperature as body temperature rises, one's perception of time speeds up. Conversely, as body temperature lowers, one's sense of time slows down.[26]

Reversal of temporal perception judgment

Numerous experimental findings suggest that temporal order judgments of actions and effects can be reversed under special circumstances. Experiments have shown that sensory simultaneity judgments can be manipulated by repeated exposure to non-simultaneous stimuli. In an experiment conducted by David Eagleman, a temporal order judgment reversal was induced in subjects by exposing them to delayed motor consequences. In the experiment, subjects played various forms of video games. Unbeknownst to the subjects, the experimenters introduced a fixed delay between the mouse movements and the subsequent sensory feedback. For example, a subject may not see a movement register on the screen until 150 msec after the mouse had moved. Participants playing the game quickly adapted to the delay and felt as though there was less delay between their mouse movement and the sensory feedback. When the experimenters finally removed the delay, the subjects commonly felt as though the effect on the screen happened just before they commanded it. This work addresses how the perceived timing of effects is modulated by expectations, and the extent to which such predictions are quickly modifiable.[27]

Numerous experimental findings also suggest that temporal order judgement of a pair of tactile stimuli, delivered in rapid succession, one to each hand, is noticeably impaired (i.e., misreported) by crossing the hands over the midline. However, congenitally blind subjects showed no trace of temporal order judgement reversal after crossing the arms. These results suggest that tactile signals taken in by the congenitally blind are ordered in time without being referred to a visuo-spatial representation. Unlike the congenitally blind subjects, the temporal order judgements of the late-onset blind subjects were impaired when crossing the arms to a similar extent as non-blind subjects. These results suggest that the associations between tactile signals and visuo-spatial representation is maintained once it is accomplished during infancy. Some research studies have also found that the subjects showed much-reduced deficits in tactile temporal order judgements when the arms were crossed behind their arms than when they were crossed in front.[28][29][30]

Effects of clinical disorders

Parkinson's disease,[31] schizophrenia,[32] and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)[33] have been linked to abnormalities in dopamine levels in the brain as well as to noticeable impairments in time perception. Neuropharmacological research indicates that the internal clock, used to time durations in the seconds-to-minutes range, is linked to dopamine function in the basal ganglia.[32] Studies in which children with ADHD are given time estimation tasks shows that time passes very slowly for them. Children with Tourette’s Syndrome, for example, who need to use the pre-frontal cortex just behind the forehead to help them control their tics, are better at estimating intervals of time just over a second than other children.

In his book "Awakenings", Oliver Sacks discusses how patients with Parkinson's disease experience deficits in their awareness of time and tempo. For example, Mr E, when asked to clap his hands steadily and regularly did so for the first few claps before clapping faster and irregularly; culminating in an apparent freezing of motion. When he finished, Mr E asked if his observers were glad he did it correctly to which they replied "no". Mr E was offended by this because to him, his claps were regular and steady. When given L-DOPA, these deficits are lessened or subside entirely depending on the dose. This case not only shows that Parkinson's disease is related to time perception deficits but it also demonstrates how dopamine is involved.[34]

Dopamine is also theorized to play a role in the attention deficits present with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Specifically, dopaminergic systems are involved in working memory and inhibitory processes, both of which are believed central to ADHD pathology.[33] Children with ADHD have also been found to be significantly impaired on time discrimination tasks (telling the difference between two stimuli of different temporal lengths) and respond earlier on time reproduction tasks (duplicating the duration of a presented stimulus) than normal controls.[35]

Along with other perceptual abnormalities, it has been noted by psychologists that schizophrenia patients have an altered sense of time. This was first described in psychology by Minkowski in 1927.[36] Many schizophrenic patients stop perceiving time as a flow of causally linked events. It has been suggested that there is usually a delay in time perception in schizophrenic patients compared to normal subjects.

These defects in time perception may play a part in the hallucinations and delusions experienced by schizophrenic patients according to some studies. Some researchers suggest that "abnormal timing judgment leads to a deficit in action attribution and action perception."[36]

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Experience and Perception of Time". Retrieved 2009-10-22.
  2. ^ "Brain Areas Critical To Human Time Sense Identified". UniSci – Daily University Science News. 2001-02-27.
  3. ^ Mackintosh NJ (1994). Animal learning and cognition. Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-161953-2.
  4. ^ Jaldow EJ, Oakley DA, Davey GC (1989). "Performance of Decorticated Rats on Fixed Interval and Fixed Time Schedules". Eur. J. Neurosci. 1 (5): 461–470. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00352.x. PMID 12106131. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ James, W. (1893). The principles of psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company. Page 609.
  6. ^ Anonymous (E. Robert Kelly), The Alternative: A Study in Psychology. London: Macmillan and Co.,1882.
  7. ^ a b c Andersen, Holly (pending). "A brief history of time-consciousness: historical precursors to James and Husserl" (PDF). Journal of the History of Philosophy. Retrieved 2008-02-02. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ "The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness." In Petitot, Varela, Pacoud & Roy (eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
  9. ^ "It Seems Like Only Yesterday: The Nature and Consequences of Telescoping Errors in Marketing Research". Journal of Consumer Psychology. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ^ Wada Y, Masuda T, Noguchi K, 2005, "Temporal illusion called 'kappa effect' in event perception" Perception 34 ECVP Abstract Supplement
  11. ^ Yarrow K, Haggard P, Heal R, Brown P, Rothwell JC (2001). "Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity". Nature. 414 (6861): 302–5. doi:10.1038/35104551. PMID 11713528. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Morrone MC, Ross J, Burr D (2005). "Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space". Nat. Neurosci. 8 (7): 950–4. doi:10.1038/nn1488. PMID 15965472. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Terao M, Watanabe J, Yagi A, Nishida S (2008). "Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time intervals". Nat. Neurosci. 11 (5): 541–2. doi:10.1038/nn.2111. PMID 18408716. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ "David dives in". justRegional publishing. 13 July 2013. Retrieved 13 July 2013.
  15. ^ Stetson C, Fiesta MP, Eagleman DM (2007). "Does time really slow down during a frightening event?". PLoS ONE. 2 (12): e1295. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001295. PMC 2110887. PMID 18074019.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  16. ^ Rudd M, Vohs KD, Aaker J (2012). "Awe expands people's perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being" (PDF). Psychol Sci. 23 (10): 1130–6. doi:10.1177/0956797612438731. PMID 22886132. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ Gruber RP, Wagner LF, Block RA (2000). "Subjective Time Versus Proper (Clock) Time". In Saniga M, Buccheri R, Di Gesù V (ed.). Studies on the structure of time: from physics to psycho(patho)logy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. p. 54. ISBN 0-306-46439-X. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ Robert, Adler. "Look how time flies . ". Retrieved 2009-10-22.
  19. ^ Holmes B (1996). "Why time flies in old age". New Scientist magazine (2057). {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  20. ^ Wittmann M, Carter O, Hasler F, Cahn BR, Grimberg U, Spring P, Hell D, Flohr H, Vollenweider FX (2007). "Effects of psilocybin on time perception and temporal control of behaviour in humans". J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxford). 21 (1): 50–64. doi:10.1177/0269881106065859. PMID 16714323. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Wittmann M, Leland DS, Churan J, Paulus MP (2007). "Impaired time perception and motor timing in stimulant-dependent subjects". Drug Alcohol Depend. 90 (2–3): 183–92. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.03.005. PMC 1997301. PMID 17434690. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ Cheng RK, MacDonald CJ, Meck WH (2006). "Differential effects of cocaine and ketamine on time estimation: implications for neurobiological models of interval timing". Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 85 (1): 114–22. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.07.019. PMID 16920182. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. ^ Tinklenberg JR, Roth WT, Kopell BS (1976). "Marijuana and ethanol: differential effects on time perception, heart rate, and subjective response". Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 49 (3): 275–9. doi:10.1007/BF00426830. PMID 826945. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ^ Arzy S, Molnar-Szakacs I, Blanke O (2008). "Self in time: imagined self-location influences neural activity related to mental time travel". J. Neurosci. 28 (25): 6502–7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5712-07.2008. PMID 18562621. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Kramer RS, Weger UW, Sharma D (2013). "The effect of mindfulness meditation on time perception". Conscious Cogn. 22 (3): 846–852. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.05.008. PMID 23778017. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ Wearden JH, Penton-Voak IS (1995). "Feeling the heat: body temperature and the rate of subjective time, revisited". Q J Exp Psychol B. 48 (2): 129–41. PMID 7597195. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  27. ^ Stetson C, Cui X, Montague PR, Eagleman DM (2006). "Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation" (PDF). Neuron. 51 (5): 651–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.006. PMID 16950162. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S (2001). "Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing" (PDF). Nat. Neurosci. 4 (7): 759–65. doi:10.1038/89559. PMID 11426234. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  29. ^ Sambo CF, Torta DM, Gallace A, Liang M, Moseley GL, Iannetti GD (2013). "The temporal order judgement of tactile and nociceptive stimuli is impaired by crossing the hands over the body midline" (PDF). Pain. 154 (2): 242–7. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.010. PMID 23200703. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ Takahashi T, Kansaku K, Wada M, Shibuya S, Kitazawa S (2013). "Neural correlates of tactile temporal-order judgment in humans: an FMRI study". Cereb. Cortex. 23 (8): 1952–64. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs179. PMID 22761307. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Pastor MA, Artieda J, Jahanshahi M, Obeso JA (1992). "Time estimation and reproduction is abnormal in Parkinson's disease". Brain. 115 Pt 1: 211–25. doi:10.1093/brain/115.1.211. PMID 1559155. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ a b Davalos DB, Kisley MA, Ross RG (2002). "Deficits in auditory and visual temporal perception in schizophrenia". Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 7 (4): 273–82. doi:10.1080/13546800143000230. PMID 16571542. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ a b Levy F, Swanson JM (2001). "Timing, space and ADHD: the dopamine theory revisited". Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 35 (4): 504–11. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00923.x. PMID 11531733. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  34. ^ Sacks OW (1999). Awakenings. New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 0-375-70405-1.
  35. ^ Smith A, Taylor E, Rogers JW, Newman S, Rubia K (2002). "Evidence for a pure time perception deficit in children with ADHD". J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 43 (4): 529–42. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00043. PMID 12030598. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ^ a b Franck N, Posada A, Pichon S, Haggard P (2005). "Altered subjective time of events in schizophrenia". J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 193 (5): 350–3. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000161699.76032.09. PMID 15870620. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Further reading

External links

Wikibooks has more on the topic of: Time perception
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Time_perception&oldid=568483944"