Azar Nafisi: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 61: Line 61:
In a 2003 article for ''The Guardian'', Brian Whitaker criticized Nafisi for working for the public relations firm [[Benador Associates]] which he argues promoted the neo-conservative ideas of "[[creative destruction]]" and "total war".<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/feb/24/worlddispatch.usa ''The Guardian'': Conflict and catchphrases]</ref>
In a 2003 article for ''The Guardian'', Brian Whitaker criticized Nafisi for working for the public relations firm [[Benador Associates]] which he argues promoted the neo-conservative ideas of "[[creative destruction]]" and "total war".<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/feb/24/worlddispatch.usa ''The Guardian'': Conflict and catchphrases]</ref>


In 2006 [[Columbia University]] professor [[Hamid Dabashi]] compared ''Reading Lolita in Tehran'' to "the most pestiferous colonial projects of the British in India," and asserted that Nafisi functions as a colonial agent. He then classed Nafisi with the U.S. soldier convicted of mistreating prisoners at Abu Ghraib. "To me there is no difference between [[Lynndie England]] and Azar Nafisi."<ref name=Dabashi>[http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/columnists/story.html?id=9837485b-aef9-49aa-b04d-8c73c804862e Reading Lolita at Columbia<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>Boston Globe , Women and Islam, by Cathy Young, The Boston Globe , October 23, 2006 [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/10/23/women_and_islam/]</ref>
In 2006, [[Columbia University]] professor [[Hamid Dabashi]], in an essay published in the Cairo-based, English-language paper Al-Ahram (Dabashi's attack on Nafisi became a cover story for an edition of the [[Chronicle of Higher Education]])<ref>[http://chronicle.com/article/A-Collision-of-Prose-and/36204 A Collision of Prose and Politics] by Richard Byrne, Chronicle of Higher Education, October 13, 2006.</ref> compared ''Reading Lolita in Tehran'' to "the most pestiferous colonial projects of the British in India," and asserted that Nafisi functions as a "native informer and colonial agent" whose writing has cleared the way for an upcoming exercise of military intervention on Middle Eastern. He also labelled Nafisi as a "[[Comprador|comprador]] intellectual," a comparison to the "treasonous" Chinese employees of mainland British firms, who sold out their country for commercial gain and imperial grace. In an interview [[Z Communications|Z magazine]], he classed Nafisi with the U.S. soldier convicted of [[Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse|mistreating prisoners at Abu Ghraib]]: "To me there is no difference between [[Lynndie England]] and Azar Nafisi."<ref name=Dabashi>[http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/columnists/story.html?id=9837485b-aef9-49aa-b04d-8c73c804862e Reading Lolita at Columbia<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>Boston Globe , Women and Islam, by Cathy Young, The Boston Globe , October 23, 2006 [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/10/23/women_and_islam/]</ref> Finally, Dabashi stated that book's cover image (which appears to be two veiled teenage women reading Lolita in Tehran) is in fact "Orientalised pedophilia" designed to appeal to "the most deranged Oriental fantasies of a nation already petrified out of its wits by a ferocious war waged against the phantasmagoric Arab/Muslim male potency that has just castrated the two totem poles of U.S. empire in New York."<ref name=Gideon/>


Critics such as Dabashi have accused Nafisi of having close relations with [[neoconservatives]]. In the acknowledgements she makes in ''Reading Lolita in Tehran'', Nafisi writes of [[Princeton University]] historian [[Bernard Lewis]] as ''"one who opened the door"''. Nafisi, who opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, rejects such accusations as "guilt by association," noting that she has both "radical friends" and "conservative friends."<ref>[http://chronicle.com/free/v53/i08/08a01201.htm Richard Byrne, "A Collision of Prose and Politics]</ref>
Critics such as Dabashi have accused Nafisi of having close relations with [[neoconservatives]]. In the acknowledgements she makes in ''Reading Lolita in Tehran'', Nafisi writes of [[Princeton University]] historian [[Bernard Lewis]] as ''"one who opened the door"''. Nafisi, who opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, rejects such accusations as "guilt by association," noting that she has both "radical friends" and "conservative friends."<ref>[http://chronicle.com/free/v53/i08/08a01201.htm Richard Byrne, "A Collision of Prose and Politics]</ref>
Line 73: Line 73:
*Ali Banuazizi, the codirector of Boston College’s Middle East studies program, stated that Dabashi's article was very ‘‘intemperate’’ and that it was ‘‘not worth the attention’’ it had received.
*Ali Banuazizi, the codirector of Boston College’s Middle East studies program, stated that Dabashi's article was very ‘‘intemperate’’ and that it was ‘‘not worth the attention’’ it had received.
*Christopher Shea of the ''Boston Globe'' argued that while Dabashi spent "several thousand words...eviscerating the book," his main point was not about the specific text but rather the book’s black-and-white portrayal of Iran.<ref name=bookclubbed>[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/10/29/book_clubbed/?page=2 Book clubbed] by Christopher Shea, The Boston Globe, October 29, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).</ref>
*Christopher Shea of the ''Boston Globe'' argued that while Dabashi spent "several thousand words...eviscerating the book," his main point was not about the specific text but rather the book’s black-and-white portrayal of Iran.<ref name=bookclubbed>[http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/10/29/book_clubbed/?page=2 Book clubbed] by Christopher Shea, The Boston Globe, October 29, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).</ref>
*Writing in The New Republic, Marty Peretz sharply criticized Dabashi, and rhetorically asked ‘‘Over what kind of faculty does [Columbia president] Lee Bollinger preside?"<ref name=bookclubbed/>
*In an article posted on Slate.com, author Gideon Lewis-Kraus described Dabashi's article as "a less-than-coherent pastiche of stock anti-war sentiment, strategic misreading, and childish calumny" and that Dabashi "insists on seeing it as political perfidy" which allows him "to preserve his fantasy that criticizing Nafisi makes him a usefully engaged intellectual."<ref>[http://www.slate.com/id/2154700/ Pawn of the Neocons?] by Gideon Lewis-Kraus, Slate.com, November 30, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).</ref>
*In an article posted on Slate.com, author Gideon Lewis-Kraus described Dabashi's article as "a less-than-coherent pastiche of stock anti-war sentiment, strategic misreading, and childish calumny" and that Dabashi "insists on seeing it as political perfidy" which allows him "to preserve his fantasy that criticizing Nafisi makes him a usefully engaged intellectual."<ref name=Gideon>[http://www.slate.com/id/2154700/ Pawn of the Neocons?] by Gideon Lewis-Kraus, Slate.com, November 30, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).</ref>
*[[Robert Fulford (journalist)|Robert Fulford]] sharply criticized Dabashi's comments in the [[National Post]], arguing that "Dabashi's frame of reference veers from [[Joseph Stalin]] to [[Edward Said]]. Like a Stalinist, he tries to convert culture into politics, the first step toward [[Totalitarianism|totalitarianism]]. Like the late Edward Said, he brands every thought he dislikes as an example of imperialism, expressing the West's desire for hegemony over the downtrodden (even when oil-rich) nations of the Third World." Fulford added that "While imitating the attitudes of Said, Dabashi deploys painful cliches."<ref name=bookclubbed/><ref name="Fulford"/>
*[[Robert Fulford (journalist)|Robert Fulford]] sharply criticized Dabashi's comments in the [[National Post]], arguing that "Dabashi's frame of reference veers from [[Joseph Stalin]] to [[Edward Said]]. Like a Stalinist, he tries to convert culture into politics, the first step toward [[Totalitarianism|totalitarianism]]. Like the late Edward Said, he brands every thought he dislikes as an example of imperialism, expressing the West's desire for hegemony over the downtrodden (even when oil-rich) nations of the Third World." Fulford added that "While imitating the attitudes of Said, Dabashi deploys painful cliches."<ref name=bookclubbed/><ref name="Fulford"/>
*Firoozeh Papan-Matin, the Director of Persian and Iranian Studies at the [[University of Washington]] in Seattle, stated that Dabashi's accusation that Nafisi is promoting a "'kaffeeklatsch' worldview... callously ignores the extreme social and political conditions that forced Nafisi underground." Papan Matin also argued that "Dabashi’s attack is that whether Nafisi is a collaborator with the [United States]" was not relevant to the legitimate questions set forth in her book.<ref>[http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1190886485566&pagename=Zone-English-Muslim_Affairs%2FMAELayout Reading & Misreading Lolita in Tehran] by Dr. Firoozeh Papan-Matin, IslamOnline, 2007.</ref>
*Firoozeh Papan-Matin, the Director of Persian and Iranian Studies at the [[University of Washington]] in Seattle, stated that Dabashi's accusation that Nafisi is promoting a "'kaffeeklatsch' worldview... callously ignores the extreme social and political conditions that forced Nafisi underground." Papan Matin also argued that "Dabashi’s attack is that whether Nafisi is a collaborator with the [United States]" was not relevant to the legitimate questions set forth in her book.<ref>[http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1190886485566&pagename=Zone-English-Muslim_Affairs%2FMAELayout Reading & Misreading Lolita in Tehran] by Dr. Firoozeh Papan-Matin, IslamOnline, 2007.</ref>

Revision as of 22:02, 20 October 2011

Azar Nafisi
Azar Nafisi lecturing at the Spanish National Library (24 February 2010)
Azar Nafisi lecturing at the Spanish National Library (24 February 2010)
BornPersian: آذر نفیسی
ca. 1947
Iran
OccupationWriter, professor
LanguageEnglish
CitizenshipAmerican
Alma materUniversity of Oklahoma
Notable worksReading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books
Notable awards2004 Non-fiction Book of the Year Award (Booksense), Persian Golden Lioness Award

Azar Nafisi(Persian: آذر نفیسی), born ca. 1947,[1][2] is an Iranian academic and bestselling writer who has resided in the United States since 1997 when she emigrated from Iran. Her field is English language literature. Nafisi's 2003 book Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books has been translated into 32 languages. It was on the New York Times Bestseller list for 117 weeks, and has won numerous literary awards, including the 2004 Non-fiction Book of the Year Award from Booksense, and the Europe based Persian Golden Lioness Award for literature.[3][4] The book also led to controversy about Nafisi's alleged connections to neoconservatism and colonialism.[5] She published an autobiography, Things I've been silent about: memories of a prodigal daughter (2008), focusing on the impact on her throughout her life of her relations with her parents (her mother peevish and cold, her father affectionate and companionate) and of decades of political upheaval in Iran, including the father's incarceration under the Shah on trumped-up charges of financial irregularities.

Nafisi has been a visiting fellow and lecturer at the Foreign Policy Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and served on the Board of Trustees of Freedom House.

Early life

Azar Nafisi is the daughter of Ahmad Nafisi, a former mayor of Tehran (1961–1963) who was the youngest man ever appointed to the post up to that time,

Time in Iran

Nafisi returned to Iran in 1979 where for a brief time she taught English literature at the University of Tehran.

In the aftermath of the Iranian revolution of 1979 and the subsequent rise to power of the Ayatollah Khomeini, Nafisi soon became restless with the stringent rules imposed upon women by her country's new rulers. She spoke of the freedom that she believed women in some countries took for granted, which women in Iran had now lost as the Khomeini regime enacted laws curtailing women's rights.

In 1995, she states that she was no longer able to teach English literature properly without attracting the scrutiny of the faculty authorities, so she quit teaching at the university, and instead invited seven of her female students to attend regular meetings at her house, every Thursday morning. They studied literary works including some considered controversial in postrevolutionary Iranian society such as Lolita alongside other works such as Madame Bovary. She also taught novels by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Henry James and Jane Austen, attempting to understand and interpret them from a modern Iranian perspective.[6]

When asked by an interviewer in 2003 if there was "ever a time, when you were living in Iran, when you would have welcomed the idea of a regime change implemented by foreign forces", Nafisi claimed, "Some Iranians were so desperate that they would have wanted the foreign powers to come in, but I didn't feel that way. ... in Iran, I don't think that we needed foreign intervention at any point." [6]

Work

Nafisi left Iran on June 24, 1997 and moved to the United States, where she wrote Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books, a book where she describes her experiences as a secular woman living and working in the Islamic Republic of Iran. In the book, she declares "I left Iran, but Iran did not leave me."

Nafisi has held the post of a visiting fellow and lecturer at the Foreign Policy Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) in Washington, DC and has served on the Board of Trustees of Freedom House, a United States nongovernmental organization (NGO) which conducts research and advocacy on democracy.[7]

Criticism

In a 2003 article for The Guardian, Brian Whitaker criticized Nafisi for working for the public relations firm Benador Associates which he argues promoted the neo-conservative ideas of "creative destruction" and "total war".[8]

In 2006, Columbia University professor Hamid Dabashi, in an essay published in the Cairo-based, English-language paper Al-Ahram (Dabashi's attack on Nafisi became a cover story for an edition of the Chronicle of Higher Education)[9] compared Reading Lolita in Tehran to "the most pestiferous colonial projects of the British in India," and asserted that Nafisi functions as a "native informer and colonial agent" whose writing has cleared the way for an upcoming exercise of military intervention on Middle Eastern. He also labelled Nafisi as a "comprador intellectual," a comparison to the "treasonous" Chinese employees of mainland British firms, who sold out their country for commercial gain and imperial grace. In an interview Z magazine, he classed Nafisi with the U.S. soldier convicted of mistreating prisoners at Abu Ghraib: "To me there is no difference between Lynndie England and Azar Nafisi."[5][10] Finally, Dabashi stated that book's cover image (which appears to be two veiled teenage women reading Lolita in Tehran) is in fact "Orientalised pedophilia" designed to appeal to "the most deranged Oriental fantasies of a nation already petrified out of its wits by a ferocious war waged against the phantasmagoric Arab/Muslim male potency that has just castrated the two totem poles of U.S. empire in New York."[11]

Critics such as Dabashi have accused Nafisi of having close relations with neoconservatives. In the acknowledgements she makes in Reading Lolita in Tehran, Nafisi writes of Princeton University historian Bernard Lewis as "one who opened the door". Nafisi, who opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, rejects such accusations as "guilt by association," noting that she has both "radical friends" and "conservative friends."[12]

In a critical article in the academic journal Comparative American Studies, titled "Reading Azar Nafisi in Tehran", University of Tehran literature professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi states that "Nafisi constantly confirms what orientalist representations have regularly claimed". He also points out that she "has produced gross misrepresentations of Iranian society and Islam and that she uses quotes and references which are inaccurate, misleading, or even wholly invented."[13]

Responses

Nafisi responded to Dabashi's criticism by stating that she is not, as Dabashi claims, a neoconservative, that she opposed the Iraq war, and that she is more interested in literature than in politics. In an interview, Nafisi stated that she's never argued for an attack on Iran and that democracy, when it comes, should come from the Iranian people (and not from US military or political intervention). She added that while she is willing to engage in "serious argument...Debate that is polarized isn't worth my time." She stated that she did not respond directly to Dabashi because "You don't want to debase yourself and start calling names."[14][15]

Nafisi was also defended by a number of sources.

  • Ali Banuazizi, the codirector of Boston College’s Middle East studies program, stated that Dabashi's article was very ‘‘intemperate’’ and that it was ‘‘not worth the attention’’ it had received.
  • Christopher Shea of the Boston Globe argued that while Dabashi spent "several thousand words...eviscerating the book," his main point was not about the specific text but rather the book’s black-and-white portrayal of Iran.[14]
  • Writing in The New Republic, Marty Peretz sharply criticized Dabashi, and rhetorically asked ‘‘Over what kind of faculty does [Columbia president] Lee Bollinger preside?"[14]
  • In an article posted on Slate.com, author Gideon Lewis-Kraus described Dabashi's article as "a less-than-coherent pastiche of stock anti-war sentiment, strategic misreading, and childish calumny" and that Dabashi "insists on seeing it as political perfidy" which allows him "to preserve his fantasy that criticizing Nafisi makes him a usefully engaged intellectual."[11]
  • Robert Fulford sharply criticized Dabashi's comments in the National Post, arguing that "Dabashi's frame of reference veers from Joseph Stalin to Edward Said. Like a Stalinist, he tries to convert culture into politics, the first step toward totalitarianism. Like the late Edward Said, he brands every thought he dislikes as an example of imperialism, expressing the West's desire for hegemony over the downtrodden (even when oil-rich) nations of the Third World." Fulford added that "While imitating the attitudes of Said, Dabashi deploys painful cliches."[14][15]
  • Firoozeh Papan-Matin, the Director of Persian and Iranian Studies at the University of Washington in Seattle, stated that Dabashi's accusation that Nafisi is promoting a "'kaffeeklatsch' worldview... callously ignores the extreme social and political conditions that forced Nafisi underground." Papan Matin also argued that "Dabashi’s attack is that whether Nafisi is a collaborator with the [United States]" was not relevant to the legitimate questions set forth in her book.[16]

Works

  • Nafisi, Azar. "Images of Women in Classical Persian Literature and the Contemporary Iranian Novel." The Eye of the Storm: Women in Post-Revolutionary Iran. Ed. Mahnaz Afkhami and Erika Friedl. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1994. 115-30.
  • Anti-Terra: A Critical Study of Vladimir Nabokov’s Novels (1994).
  • Nafisi, Azar. "Imagination as Subversion: Narrative as a Tool of Civic Awareness." Muslim Women and the Politics of Participation. Ed. Mahnaz Afkhami and Erika Friedl. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1997. 58-71.
  • "Tales of Subversion: Women Challenging Fundamentalism in the Islamic Republic of Iran." Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women (1999).
  • Reading Lolita in Tehran (2003).
  • Things I've Been Silent About (2008; in paperback 2010)

Notes

  1. ^ Following eighth grade, Nafisi's parents sent her to England for schooling from 1961-1963. Nafisi 2010, chapter 8, pp. 69-70; chapter 13, p. 115
  2. ^ BBC 2004 Interview with Nafisi
  3. ^ The Stephen Barclay Agency
  4. ^ Yale University Office of Public Affairs
  5. ^ a b Reading Lolita at Columbia
  6. ^ a b "The Fiction of Life" Interviews May 7, 2003
  7. ^ Freedom House: Board of Trustees
  8. ^ The Guardian: Conflict and catchphrases
  9. ^ A Collision of Prose and Politics by Richard Byrne, Chronicle of Higher Education, October 13, 2006.
  10. ^ Boston Globe , Women and Islam, by Cathy Young, The Boston Globe , October 23, 2006 [1]
  11. ^ a b Pawn of the Neocons? by Gideon Lewis-Kraus, Slate.com, November 30, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).
  12. ^ Richard Byrne, "A Collision of Prose and Politics
  13. ^ IngentaConnect: Reading Azar Nafisi in Tehran
  14. ^ a b c d Book clubbed by Christopher Shea, The Boston Globe, October 29, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).
  15. ^ a b Reading Lolita at Columbia by Robert Fulford, National Post, November 6, 2006 (retrieved on October 21, 2009).
  16. ^ Reading & Misreading Lolita in Tehran by Dr. Firoozeh Papan-Matin, IslamOnline, 2007.

Azar Nafisi's CV[1]

Bibliography

  • Nafisi, Azar. 2010 (2008). Things I've been silent about. Random House Trade Paperbacks. (Originally published 2008)

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to Azar Nafisi.

Critical

Template:Persondata

  1. ^ Azar Nafisi's CV
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azar_Nafisi&oldid=456586453"