Perepiteia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Reverting - no explanation for removal of material and additional material added is extremely POV
Line 1: Line 1:
{{for|a term developed by Aristotle in his work Poetics|peripeteia}}
{{for|a term developed by Aristotle in his work Poetics|peripeteia}}
[[Image:HeinsPerepitea.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Thane Heins and his machine.]]
[[Image:HeinsPerepitea.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Thane Heins and his machine.]]
'''Perepiteia''' is a generator developed by the [[Canada|Canadian]] inventor Thane Heins. The device is named after the Greek word for [[Peripeteia|peripety]], a dramatic reversal of circumstances or turning point in a story.
'''Perepiteia''' is a purported [[perpetual motion]] generator developed by the [[Canada|Canadian]] inventor Thane Heins. The device is named after the Greek word for [[Peripeteia|peripety]], a dramatic reversal of circumstances or turning point in a story. Due to the long history of hoaxes and failures of [[History of perpetual motion machines|perpetual motion machines]], Heins' claims about Perepiteia have been treated with skepticism.


In 2003, Heins filed a provisional [[patent application]] in Canada<ref name="Patent Application">{{Cite patent|CA|2437745|application}}</ref> but no [[patent]] was granted.<ref name="Patent Dead">[http://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/2437745/financial_transactions.html CIPO - Patent application 2437745 - Administrative Status]</ref> Heins also founded Potential Difference Inc, the website of which contains a series of videos of the inventor demonstrating the machine.<ref name="Demonstration Page on Potential Difference website">http://www.g9toengineering.com/backemf/demonstration.htm</ref>
In 2003, Heins filed a [[patent application]] in Canada<ref name="Patent Application">{{Cite patent|CA|2437745|application}}</ref> but no [[patent]] was granted.<ref name="Patent Dead">[http://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/2437745/financial_transactions.html CIPO - Patent application 2437745 - Administrative Status]</ref> Heins also founded Potential Difference Inc, the website of which contains a series of videos of the inventor demonstrating the machine.<ref name="Demonstration Page on Potential Difference website">http://www.g9toengineering.com/backemf/demonstration.htm</ref>


Heins has recently stated that he is unsure whether or not the machine really produces energy, but in communications with science writer David Bradley of ScienceBase, Heins made claims of up to 7000% efficiency for a bi-toroidal transformer.<ref name="Sciencebase article on Sciencebase">[http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/potential-difference-transformation.html Free energy with magnetic reluctance<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Heins, who reportedly works 8–12 hours a day on the Perepiteia, insists that it is viable and that "This technology should be mainstream."<ref>[http://www.canadianbusiness.com/innovation/article.jsp?content=20080611_72329_72329 The next great Canadian idea: Peripiteia generator] by Sharda Prashad, Canadian Business magazine, July 11, 2008. (retrieved on January 3, 2009).</ref>
==OUTDATED Theory==

==Theory==
Mechanically, the device appears to be an [[induction motor]] with a magnetic material placed inside the rotor core.<ref name="BeamMeUp analysis">[http://wrfrbeameup.blogspot.com/2008/02/thane-heins-perepiteia-device.html Beam Me Up - Science & Science Fiction news: Thane Heins' Perepiteia device<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Heins believes that the device's potential may rest in its atypical manipulation of the [[Back emf|back electromotive force (back EMF)]]. A more detailed description of the device may be found in the patent application, minus supporting figures.<ref name="Patent Application"/>
Mechanically, the device appears to be an [[induction motor]] with a magnetic material placed inside the rotor core.<ref name="BeamMeUp analysis">[http://wrfrbeameup.blogspot.com/2008/02/thane-heins-perepiteia-device.html Beam Me Up - Science & Science Fiction news: Thane Heins' Perepiteia device<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Heins believes that the device's potential may rest in its atypical manipulation of the [[Back emf|back electromotive force (back EMF)]]. A more detailed description of the device may be found in the patent application, minus supporting figures.<ref name="Patent Application"/>


Line 11: Line 13:


==Operation==
==Operation==
Perepiteia's process begins by loading the generator to get a current, which typically causes the wire coil to build up a large electromagnetic field. Usually, this kind of electromagnetic field creates an effect called the [[Counter-electromotive force|back electromotive force (back EMF)]] due to [[Lenz's law]]. The effect should repel the spinning magnets on the rotor, and slow them down until the motor stops completely, in accordance with the law of conservation. However, instead of stopping, the rotor accelerates - i.e. the magnetic friction did not repel the magnets and wire coil. Heins states that the steel rotor and driveshaft had conducted the magnetic resistance away from the coil and back into the electric motor. In effect, the back EMF was boosting the magnetic fields used by the motor to generate electrical energy and cause acceleration. The faster the motor accelerated, the stronger the electromagnetic field it would create on the wire coil, which in turn would make the motor go even faster. Heins seemed to have created a positive feedback loop. To confirm the theory, Heins replaced part of the driveshaft with plastic pipe that wouldn't conduct the magnetic field. There was no acceleration.<ref name=PhysOrg/>
Perepiteia's process begins by overloading the generator to get a current, which typically causes the wire coil to build up a large electromagnetic field. Usually, this kind of electromagnetic field creates an effect called the [[Counter-electromotive force|back electromotive force (back EMF)]] due to [[Lenz's law]]. The effect should repel the spinning magnets on the rotor, and slow them down until the motor stops completely, in accordance with the law of conservation. However, instead of stopping, the rotor accelerates - i.e. the magnetic friction did not repel the magnets and wire coil. Heins states that the steel rotor and driveshaft had conducted the magnetic resistance away from the coil and back into the electric motor. In effect, the back EMF was boosting the magnetic fields used by the motor to generate electrical energy and cause acceleration. The faster the motor accelerated, the stronger the electromagnetic field it would create on the wire coil, which in turn would make the motor go even faster. Heins seemed to have created a positive feedback loop. To confirm the theory, Heins replaced part of the driveshaft with plastic pipe that wouldn't conduct the magnetic field. There was no acceleration.<ref name=PhysOrg/>


==Scientific examination==
==Scientific examination==
Line 18: Line 20:
After examining the machine and witnessing a demonstration, [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] (MIT) professor Markus Zahn admitted that he could not fully explain its operation. Although he refused to call it [[perpetual motion]], he stated that it might be an extremely efficient motor.<ref name="Popular Fidelity article">[http://www.popfi.com/2008/02/07/the-chef-who-could-change-the-world-of-physics/ The Chef Who Could Change The World of Physics » Popular Fidelity » Unusual Stuff<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Regarding the device, Zahn stated that "It's an unusual phenomena{{sic}} I wouldn't have predicted in advance. But I saw it. It's real. Now I'm just trying to figure it out...To my mind this is unexpected and new, and it's worth exploring all the possible advantages once you're convinced it's a real effect."<ref name="Gizmodo Article">[http://gizmodo.com/353655/perepiteia-perpetual+motion-machine-may-actually-dosomething Perepiteia Perpetual-Motion Machine May Actually Do...Something], gizmodo.com, February 7, 2008.</ref> However, even if Perepiteia does not produce [[perpetual motion]], Zahn still believes that the device could have considerable practical applications, noting that "There are an infinite number of induction machines in people's homes and everywhere around the world. If you could make them more efficient, cumulatively, it could make a big difference."<ref name=PhysOrg>[http://www.physorg.com/news121610315.html Inventor Doesn't Dare Say 'Perpetual Motion Machine'], Physorg.com, February 7, 2008.</ref>
After examining the machine and witnessing a demonstration, [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] (MIT) professor Markus Zahn admitted that he could not fully explain its operation. Although he refused to call it [[perpetual motion]], he stated that it might be an extremely efficient motor.<ref name="Popular Fidelity article">[http://www.popfi.com/2008/02/07/the-chef-who-could-change-the-world-of-physics/ The Chef Who Could Change The World of Physics » Popular Fidelity » Unusual Stuff<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Regarding the device, Zahn stated that "It's an unusual phenomena{{sic}} I wouldn't have predicted in advance. But I saw it. It's real. Now I'm just trying to figure it out...To my mind this is unexpected and new, and it's worth exploring all the possible advantages once you're convinced it's a real effect."<ref name="Gizmodo Article">[http://gizmodo.com/353655/perepiteia-perpetual+motion-machine-may-actually-dosomething Perepiteia Perpetual-Motion Machine May Actually Do...Something], gizmodo.com, February 7, 2008.</ref> However, even if Perepiteia does not produce [[perpetual motion]], Zahn still believes that the device could have considerable practical applications, noting that "There are an infinite number of induction machines in people's homes and everywhere around the world. If you could make them more efficient, cumulatively, it could make a big difference."<ref name=PhysOrg>[http://www.physorg.com/news121610315.html Inventor Doesn't Dare Say 'Perpetual Motion Machine'], Physorg.com, February 7, 2008.</ref>


==Non-valid Criticism==
==Criticism==
Critics of the system have incorrectly pointed out that the system described by Heins simply demonstrates a change in the motor's [[Rolling resistance|hysteresis drag]], increasing the speed of the rotor but not producing any energy.<ref name="Slashdot Article with Explanations">[http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/09/1436257 Slashdot | Yet Another Perpetual Motion Device<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In other words, when the rotor exhibits acceleration following a specific electrical short-out, the device is merely more efficiently converting the input electricity to mechanical energy than in the other test configurations.
Critics of the system have pointed out that the system described by Heins simply demonstrates a change in the motor's [[Rolling resistance|hysteresis drag]], increasing the speed of the rotor but not producing any energy.<ref name="Slashdot Article with Explanations">[http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/09/1436257 Slashdot | Yet Another Perpetual Motion Device<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In other words, when the rotor exhibits acceleration following a specific electrical short-out, the device is merely more efficiently converting the input electricity to mechanical energy than in the other test configurations.


On February 29, 2008, six members of [http://ottawaskeptics.org/ Ottawa Skeptics], all of whom do not possess qualifications in engineering and technology, met at the Colonel By building at the [[University of Ottawa]] to witness a demonstration of Perepiteia. Heins, who conducted the demonstration, later met with the members to discuss his device and answer questions. In a subsequent report released in May, Ottawa Skeptics expressed severe doubts about Heins' claims regarding Perepiteia. They noted that Perepiteia produces either observed acceleration or a slight increase in generator electrical output. While acknowledging that the speed-up behaviour of the generator cannot be fully explained. <ref name="Ottawa Skeptics Report">[http://ottawaskeptics.org/local-investigations/121-in-this-town-we-obey-the-laws-of-thermodynamics In This Town We Obey the Laws of Thermodynamics] by Seanna Watson, Ottawa Skeptics May 4, 2008.</ref>
On February 29, 2008, six members of [http://ottawaskeptics.org/ Ottawa Skeptics], all of whom possess qualifications in engineering and technology, met at the Colonel By building at the [[University of Ottawa]] to witness a demonstration of Perepiteia. Heins, who conducted the demonstration, later met with the members to discuss his device and answer questions. In a subsequent report released in May, Ottawa Skeptics expressed severe doubts about Heins' claims regarding Perepiteia. They noted that Perepiteia produces either observed acceleration or a slight increase in generator electrical output but that this alone does not automatically mean that "free energy" or perpetual motion is being produced or that there is a "real and measurable effect." While acknowledging that the speed-up behaviour of the generator cannot be fully explained, they stated that there is no evidence that Perepiteia "represents any challenge to currently known laws of physics."<ref name="Ottawa Skeptics Report">[http://ottawaskeptics.org/local-investigations/121-in-this-town-we-obey-the-laws-of-thermodynamics In This Town We Obey the Laws of Thermodynamics] by Seanna Watson, Ottawa Skeptics May 4, 2008.</ref>


On May 21, 2009, a skeptic Nikolai Bilaniuk writing under the name Natan Weissman wrote an explanation of the Perepeteia machine in relation to its motor, a Ryobi bench grinder. The author states wrongly that the acceleration behavior of the machine is due to the consumption of torque from the induction motor, rather than any unconventional manipulation of EMF fields.<ref name="Thane Heins Perepiteia Explained">[http://www.sciscoop.com/perepiteia-explanation.pdf Explanation of the Perepiteia rotating machine and the accompanying theory concerning "Back EMF"] by Nikolai Bilaniuk/Natan Weissman, SciScoop May 21, 2009.</ref>
On May 21, 2009, a skeptic writing under the name Natan Weissman wrote an explanation of the Perepeteia machine in relation to its motor, a Ryobi bench grinder. The author states that the acceleration behavior of the machine is due to the consumption of torque from the induction motor, rather than any unconventional manipulation of EMF fields.<ref name="Thane Heins Perepiteia Explained">[http://www.sciscoop.com/perepiteia-explanation.pdf Explanation of the Perepiteia rotating machine and the accompanying theory concerning "Back EMF"] by Natan Weissman, SciScoop May 21, 2009.</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 31: Line 33:
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogLeKTlLy5E Perepiteia Generator Demonstration Video] posted on YouTube.
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogLeKTlLy5E Perepiteia Generator Demonstration Video] posted on YouTube.


[[Category:Generator]]
[[Category:Perpetual motion]]

Revision as of 05:53, 26 April 2011

File:HeinsPerepitea.jpg
Thane Heins and his machine.

Perepiteia is a purported perpetual motion generator developed by the Canadian inventor Thane Heins. The device is named after the Greek word for peripety, a dramatic reversal of circumstances or turning point in a story. Due to the long history of hoaxes and failures of perpetual motion machines, Heins' claims about Perepiteia have been treated with skepticism.

In 2003, Heins filed a patent application in Canada[1] but no patent was granted.[2] Heins also founded Potential Difference Inc, the website of which contains a series of videos of the inventor demonstrating the machine.[3]

Heins has recently stated that he is unsure whether or not the machine really produces energy, but in communications with science writer David Bradley of ScienceBase, Heins made claims of up to 7000% efficiency for a bi-toroidal transformer.[4] Heins, who reportedly works 8–12 hours a day on the Perepiteia, insists that it is viable and that "This technology should be mainstream."[5]

Theory

Mechanically, the device appears to be an induction motor with a magnetic material placed inside the rotor core.[6] Heins believes that the device's potential may rest in its atypical manipulation of the back electromotive force (back EMF). A more detailed description of the device may be found in the patent application, minus supporting figures.[1]

The apparent unique quality of the Perepiteia machine is that instead of maintaining a certain state of motion, it appears to generate acceleration. According to Heins, the Perepiteia produces magnetic friction which somehow gets turned into a magnetic boost. Using an electric motor, the drive shaft is attached to a steel rotor with small round magnets lining its outer edges. In this set-up of a simple generator, the rotor spins so that the magnets pass by a wire coil just in front of them, generating electrical energy.

Operation

Perepiteia's process begins by overloading the generator to get a current, which typically causes the wire coil to build up a large electromagnetic field. Usually, this kind of electromagnetic field creates an effect called the back electromotive force (back EMF) due to Lenz's law. The effect should repel the spinning magnets on the rotor, and slow them down until the motor stops completely, in accordance with the law of conservation. However, instead of stopping, the rotor accelerates - i.e. the magnetic friction did not repel the magnets and wire coil. Heins states that the steel rotor and driveshaft had conducted the magnetic resistance away from the coil and back into the electric motor. In effect, the back EMF was boosting the magnetic fields used by the motor to generate electrical energy and cause acceleration. The faster the motor accelerated, the stronger the electromagnetic field it would create on the wire coil, which in turn would make the motor go even faster. Heins seemed to have created a positive feedback loop. To confirm the theory, Heins replaced part of the driveshaft with plastic pipe that wouldn't conduct the magnetic field. There was no acceleration.[7]

Scientific examination

In early 2008, Heins was given access to equipment to demonstrate it by professor Riadh Habash of the University of Ottawa, who says of it, "It accelerates, but when it comes to an explanation, there is no backing theory for it. That's why we're consulting MIT. But at this time we can't support any claim."[8]

After examining the machine and witnessing a demonstration, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) professor Markus Zahn admitted that he could not fully explain its operation. Although he refused to call it perpetual motion, he stated that it might be an extremely efficient motor.[9] Regarding the device, Zahn stated that "It's an unusual phenomena [sic] I wouldn't have predicted in advance. But I saw it. It's real. Now I'm just trying to figure it out...To my mind this is unexpected and new, and it's worth exploring all the possible advantages once you're convinced it's a real effect."[10] However, even if Perepiteia does not produce perpetual motion, Zahn still believes that the device could have considerable practical applications, noting that "There are an infinite number of induction machines in people's homes and everywhere around the world. If you could make them more efficient, cumulatively, it could make a big difference."[7]

Criticism

Critics of the system have pointed out that the system described by Heins simply demonstrates a change in the motor's hysteresis drag, increasing the speed of the rotor but not producing any energy.[11] In other words, when the rotor exhibits acceleration following a specific electrical short-out, the device is merely more efficiently converting the input electricity to mechanical energy than in the other test configurations.

On February 29, 2008, six members of Ottawa Skeptics, all of whom possess qualifications in engineering and technology, met at the Colonel By building at the University of Ottawa to witness a demonstration of Perepiteia. Heins, who conducted the demonstration, later met with the members to discuss his device and answer questions. In a subsequent report released in May, Ottawa Skeptics expressed severe doubts about Heins' claims regarding Perepiteia. They noted that Perepiteia produces either observed acceleration or a slight increase in generator electrical output but that this alone does not automatically mean that "free energy" or perpetual motion is being produced or that there is a "real and measurable effect." While acknowledging that the speed-up behaviour of the generator cannot be fully explained, they stated that there is no evidence that Perepiteia "represents any challenge to currently known laws of physics."[12]

On May 21, 2009, a skeptic writing under the name Natan Weissman wrote an explanation of the Perepeteia machine in relation to its motor, a Ryobi bench grinder. The author states that the acceleration behavior of the machine is due to the consumption of torque from the induction motor, rather than any unconventional manipulation of EMF fields.[13]

References

  1. ^ a b CA application 2437745 
  2. ^ CIPO - Patent application 2437745 - Administrative Status
  3. ^ http://www.g9toengineering.com/backemf/demonstration.htm
  4. ^ Free energy with magnetic reluctance
  5. ^ The next great Canadian idea: Peripiteia generator by Sharda Prashad, Canadian Business magazine, July 11, 2008. (retrieved on January 3, 2009).
  6. ^ Beam Me Up - Science & Science Fiction news: Thane Heins' Perepiteia device
  7. ^ a b Inventor Doesn't Dare Say 'Perpetual Motion Machine', Physorg.com, February 7, 2008.
  8. ^ Hamilton, Tyler (February 4, 2008). "Turning physics on its ear". The Star. Toronto. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
  9. ^ The Chef Who Could Change The World of Physics » Popular Fidelity » Unusual Stuff
  10. ^ Perepiteia Perpetual-Motion Machine May Actually Do...Something, gizmodo.com, February 7, 2008.
  11. ^ Slashdot | Yet Another Perpetual Motion Device
  12. ^ In This Town We Obey the Laws of Thermodynamics by Seanna Watson, Ottawa Skeptics May 4, 2008.
  13. ^ Explanation of the Perepiteia rotating machine and the accompanying theory concerning "Back EMF" by Natan Weissman, SciScoop May 21, 2009.

External links