User talk:Rtkat3: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Spider-Man: new section
CorenSearchBot (talk | contribs)
Notifying user of possible copyvio on Geddon
Line 46: Line 46:


Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article [[Spider-Man]], I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the [[Talk:Spider-Man/GA1|review page]], and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article [[Spider-Man]], I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the [[Talk:Spider-Man/GA1|review page]], and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

==[[:Geddon]]==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px]]
This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Geddon]], and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/geddon.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 23:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:17, 1 March 2009

Welcome to my Talk page! If you have any comments or questions, send them here. Below is my archive pages.

Monsters

Do not re-add the link to the monster on Template:Power Rangers. The articles no longer exists. —Mythdon (talkcontribs) 14:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Swim task force

You seem to be interested in Adult Swim, and I would appreciate if you would collaborate on it at the task force, found here. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Spectacular Spider-Man

Do you have something against semi-colons? :) — GoonersWCCF (talk) 11:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nope

Please do not keep trying to push fancruft into what become Wiki-correct articles, as you did with Rhino. It will be reverted everytime. Asgardian (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, you reinserted badly written material with poor grammar; POV: missing appearances; no sources and an in-universe perspective. Style is currently being discussed here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics#Stand_up_and_take_notice.21 but no one will defend material that is sub-standard. Please do not do this again. [[Rhino (comics)|Rhino) is just one of many articles that are to be upgraded. By all means contribute, but please ensure that said contributions are beneficial.

Asgardian (talk) 23:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wikilinking in headings

Hi, I noticed that in a recent edit, you added a wikilink to a section heading. The Manual of Style strongly discourages links in headings. Consider using Template:main instead. -- Intractable (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

If you want to include bio info on this character, you can't copy it from another website such as this one. If you want to include that information, you will need to rewrite the text in your own words. BOZ (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Valerie Gray

I have nominated Valerie Gray, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie Gray. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 00:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geddon, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/geddon.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]