Wikipedia:Vagueness: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 2 edits by 2603:8000:FF0:6930:F0D9:A0D9:2AC1:487 (talk) to last revision by Hugo en résidence
Tag: Reverted
Line 3: Line 3:
This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be '''vague''', and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems and fix affected articles.
This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be '''vague''', and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems and fix affected articles.


However, this can confuse the readers if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.
==Pronouns==
[[Pronouns]] allow writers to refer back to a noun without repeating it. However, this can confuse the readers if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.


In [[John McCain]]'s article:
In [[John McCain]]'s article:
Line 10: Line 9:
'''Wrong:''' {{!xt|Palin was picked as his running mate.}} (''Whose?'')
'''Wrong:''' {{!xt|Palin was picked as his running mate.}} (''Whose?'')


'''Better:''' {{xt|John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.}}<!--or better still, who did the picking? Perhaps kill two birds with one stone in this example by using active voice?-->
'''Better:''' {{xt|John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.}}<!--or better still, who did the picking? Perhaps kill two birds with one stone in this example by using


In the [[Salton Sea]] article:
In the [[Salton Sea]] article:

Revision as of 01:12, 24 April 2024

This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be vague, and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems and fix affected articles.

However, this can confuse the readers if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.

In John McCain's article:

Wrong: Palin was picked as his running mate. (Whose?)

Better: John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.