User talk:Jellyfish

Remember to assume good faith and be civil. No personal attacks - any of those will be removed.

I'm only human a jellyfish. Please tell me if I make a mistake, whether by message, by template, or by trout.

Thankyou for helping fix kefir image

I tried to add kefir to east european cuisine but i messed it up. thanks for fixing. Philipbrochard (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Happy to help! Thank you for adding it in the first place. I had trouble with images at first, and so just played around on my user page & sandbox with them until I got the hang of it. Phönedinger's jellyfish II (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

No Jelly in your T. Hypick (talk) 05:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Liviuolos (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Schrödinger's jellyfish,

If you believe a User page should be moved to a Sandbox or Draft space, than do that rather than tagging the page for deletion. I have only created my personal page to expose people to this new concept I try to create (and not for my own benefit), if you think I made a mistake just let me know before asking for a speedy deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Syndicated_Development Liviuolos (talk)

Hi, Liviuolos - your user page, as it stands, meets the criteria for U5 of the speedy deletion criteria. Your user page (at the time of nomination) is not the place to write a pseudo-article about yourself - I recommend reading what your user page should not look like. Your contributions thus far appear to be promotional in nature. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Is this better now? Thanks! Liviuolos (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, yes, that looks a lot better! Please excuse my delayed response. Regarding the draft you're writing - it's worth noting that this looks like original research, which we don't allow here. For a topic to get an article, it first has to be notable enough, and receive significant coverage in independent secondary sources that are reliable. An article and any claims in it must be supported by accurate inline citations to those aforementioned sources.

Before you dive headfirst into creating an article, though, I'd give some of the recommended newcomer tasks like copy editing a try. Remember you can always ask for help either on your talk page with {{help me}}or at the Teahouse. Happy editing! I also recommend checking out any available tutorials. Though I'm unsure how to link to it, I've seen plenty of people doing the Wikipedia Adventure. Phönedinger's jellyfish II (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

By the way, I don't have any book yet, but I am developing that concept which with my own bias I think is worth spreading :)... But I want to develop it in Wiki, exactly because it has to be a common thinking, not my own biased opinion... Liviuolos (talk) 03:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Philipbrochard

I'm concerned. A personal attack, a lot of additions of unsourced material, claiming that "However, the majority of the scholars (jumhur) are of the opinion that Walima is ..." sourced to[ this. I'm not sure if that's even an RS, must check. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm mixed on that being a RS - authors are named, but a lot of the things I try to look for in a RS are pretty unclear. While he does respond at his talk page, responses seem to come a bit after they're sent. Hoping the next reply from him (especially with PA's happening) is understanding like the reply to the contentious topics notice was. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)