Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
"active" was removed from WP:AC/PR way back in 2014; "clear and substantial" is the current standard for non-CT appeals.
copy Tamzin's changes from sandbox, see also ARCA thread https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&oldid=1207114226#Amendment_request:_CTOP_AN_appeals
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}==
==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}==
<small>''Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Enforcement|here]]. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved {{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#ifeq: {{{demopage|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />FULLPAGENAME}}}}} | Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard | editors | administrators}}" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.''</small>


<small>''To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#ifeq: {{{demopage|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />FULLPAGENAME}}}}} | Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard |. Other editors may comment below. |{{space}}but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors.}} Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see [[WP:UNINVOLVED]]).''</small>
<small>''Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Enforcement|here]]. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved {{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#ifeq: {{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />PAGENAME}} | Administrators noticeboard | editors | administrators}}" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.''</small>

<small>''To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see [[WP:UNINVOLVED]]).''</small>


; Appealing user : {{userlinks|{{{Appealing user|Example}}}}} – ~<includeonly>~</includeonly>~~
; Appealing user : {{userlinks|{{{Appealing user|Example}}}}} – ~<includeonly>~</includeonly>~~
Line 24: Line 23:


===Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}} ===
===Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}} ===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#ifeq: {{{demopage|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />FULLPAGENAME}}}}} | Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard | |<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>


====Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)====
====Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)====
Line 31: Line 30:


===Result of the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}===
===Result of the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''}}
<!-- When closing this request (once there is a consensus) use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}} if at AE, or an archive/discussion box template if on AN, inform the user on their talk page and note it in the contentious topics log below where their sanctions is logged. -->
<!-- When closing this request (once there is a consensus) use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}} if at AE, or an archive/discussion box template if on AN, inform the user on their talk page and note it in the contentious topics log below where their sanctions is logged. -->
*
*

Latest revision as of 13:07, 14 February 2024

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user
Example (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~
Sanction being appealed
{{{Sanction being appealed}}}
Administrator imposing the sanction
Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Notification of that administrator
The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by {{{Appealing user}}}

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}

Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.

Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)

Statement by (uninvolved editor 2)

Result of the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.