Talk:Auditing (Scientology): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted |
Undid revision 1192676008 by Cambial Yellowing (talk) There is no reason to WP:REFACTOR my talk page edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{WikiProject Scientology|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
{{WikiProject Scientology|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
||
== Refbombing isn't collaboration == |
|||
== "Tin Cans" == |
|||
{{reply|Cambial Yellowing}} So instead of conceding that [https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/Mark-VII/ your cited source] doesn't mention "tin cans" or even "tin", you lie ''and'' berate me in [[Special:Diff/1192539600|your next edit summary]], then go on to [[WP:REFBOMB]] the lead using mostly outdated sources or those that rely on outdated sources. FYI: Not all auditing uses an emeter. FYI#2: The electrodes are tin-plated steel cylinders, and are not "[[tin can]]s" à la food packaging (although those were used in the early days of e-meters, and undoubtedly contributed to the current language of calling them "cans"). FYI#3: The more you push your POV, the more I feel compelled to present or defend the opposing view for correctness and good Wikipedia writing practices. FYI#4: Don't ever assume my disinclination to continue fighting over your edits is confirmation those were correct or good. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> ▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
{{reply|Cambial Yellowing}} So instead of conceding that [https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/Mark-VII/ your cited source] doesn't mention "tin cans" or even "tin", you lie ''and'' berate me in [[Special:Diff/1192539600|your next edit summary]], then go on to [[WP:REFBOMB]] the lead using mostly outdated sources or those that rely on outdated sources. FYI: Not all auditing uses an emeter. FYI#2: The electrodes are tin-plated steel cylinders, and are not "[[tin can]]s" à la food packaging (although those were used in the early days of e-meters, and undoubtedly contributed to the current language of calling them "cans"). FYI#3: The more you push your POV, the more I feel compelled to present or defend the opposing view for correctness and good Wikipedia writing practices. FYI#4: Don't ever assume my disinclination to continue fighting over your edits is confirmation those were correct or good. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> ▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:01, 30 December 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Auditing (Scientology) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | Scientology Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Refbombing isn't collaboration
@Cambial Yellowing: So instead of conceding that your cited source doesn't mention "tin cans" or even "tin", you lie and berate me in your next edit summary, then go on to WP:REFBOMB the lead using mostly outdated sources or those that rely on outdated sources. FYI: Not all auditing uses an emeter. FYI#2: The electrodes are tin-plated steel cylinders, and are not "tin cans" à la food packaging (although those were used in the early days of e-meters, and undoubtedly contributed to the current language of calling them "cans"). FYI#3: The more you push your POV, the more I feel compelled to present or defend the opposing view for correctness and good Wikipedia writing practices. FYI#4: Don't ever assume my disinclination to continue fighting over your edits is confirmation those were correct or good. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Given your tone ("I challenge you...") in your edit summary and here, I'm not going to rise to this. The source I referred to was the Secrets of Scientology site hosted on the Carnegie Mellon address. There are numerous instances where they are referred to as "tin cans", one of which I added to the references, along with several other sources from 1987, 2006, 2015. Cambial — foliar❧ 01:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)