Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
→Ban of Jack4576 from AfD: Appeal withdrawn Tag: Replaced |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
== Ban of Jack4576 from AfD == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Jack4576|Jack4576]] ([[User talk:Jack4576|talk]]) '''at''' 06:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|Jack4576}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{admin|El_C}} |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
Notification of closing admin: ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:El_C&oldid=1156302062 diff]) |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Jack4576's_repeated_poor_conduct_on_AfD|ANI discussion that lead to ban]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Necrothesp,_Jack4576,_and_AfD|Separate, contemporaneous, & overlapping ANI discussion ]] (at one point, the two discussions were merged on the page) |
|||
=== Statement by Jack4576 === |
|||
I accept that my comments at AfD were uncivil, and I accept that the incivility ought to be subject to sanction. |
|||
I disagree with the assessment of consensus by [[User:El_C]] in the discussion. The consensus is in some respects questionable due to a number of involved editors contributing to !votes that formed a part of the consensus assessment. Other issues with the discussion include dogpiling, TAGTEAMing, and general lack of quality in the overall discussion and thread that led to the ban (edit 1 & 5) |
|||
Additionally, in my view an [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Jack4576's_repeated_poor_conduct_on_AfD|indefinite TBAN from AfD]] is overly harsh |
|||
There were a reasonable amount of editors in favour of a time-limited ban, or no sanction at all. Such that I do not think an indefinite AfD TBAN is a fair assessment of the consensus here. I humbly submit that the more appropriate outcome would be a time-limited sanction (edit 2) |
|||
Alternatively, I would ask that the RNI be re-opened, with a committent from all editors (including myself) that no bludgeoning or bad behaviour ought occur. While some described my edits as bludgeoning, (a characterisation I think arguable but disputable, as I was defending myself from a pile-on; with distinct allegations being raised that required a distinct response in defence) there were other editors involved in the discussion, not targeted, that provided a large volume of comments and indeed dominated the discussion to a degree. (edit 7) |
|||
The overall quality of the discussion was very low, and while I contributed to this, I humbly submit that the fault was not totally of mine own. (edit 4 & 6) |
|||
I am raising this appeal to ArbCom, rather than to the community, on the basis that there are serious questions about the validity of the ban discussion and its closure (edit 3) |
|||
Per the comment of [[User:Elemimele]]: "I don't see quite such a convenient consensus. I see a lot of discussion with extensive "comment" sections that don't commit to supporting, and a handful of well-expressed opposes too. And this is not supposed to be a simple pile-on vote is it? For what it's worth I oppose the topic ban strongly. I disagree completely with Jack's arguments, viewpoint, and complete disregard of policy on notability, but (1) how difficult is it for an AfD closer to ignore non-policy-based, short "keeps" like Jack's? And (2) Jack is what happens when you have an open, collaborative encyclopaedia: people disagree with you. Banning Jack looks uncomfortably like banning disagreement. Not a great message to send." (edit 8) |
|||
=== Statement by El_C === |
|||
This was a sanction imposed by the community, so it should be appealed ''to'' the community rather than to ArbCom. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 06:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {Non-party} === |
|||
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information. |
|||
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * --> |
|||
=== Ban of Jack4576 from AfD: Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
* |
|||
=== Ban of Jack4576 from AfD: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> === |
|||
{{anchor|1=Ban of Jack4576 from AfD: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small> |
|||
* |
Revision as of 07:05, 22 May 2023
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|